English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Number of elements?
Unknown "A"
We do have knowledge of elements that exist here and now. How many others existed originally, still exist in othere regions, or existed for short periods of time?
Unknown "B"

The Atomic mass of the universe?
Unknown "C"
It is estimated at 4*10-79th power.
What % of all original atomic mass was grouped together at the beginning?
Unknown "E"

Assumming only mankind existed to simplify the equation, what are the odds of 7*10-27th power atoms joined together to form a man?
Unknown "F"
"F*2"= man and woman

Odds of their being on a stable planet that will sustain them?
Atmosphere: Unknown "G"
Water: Unknown "H"
Continuous food source: Unknown "I"

I will say that water will be a given. Its value is 1.

Why is it so damn hard for the evolutionist side to say:
"I DO NOT KNOW'?

NO ONE, repeat NO ONE can give an honest answer with SO many unknowns!

I don't have to be a theist to see that this is silly.
After a certain point, the answer is 0 or impossible.

2006-07-16 11:47:36 · 5 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Science & Mathematics Physics

5 answers

I think you are right. Evolution sucks and is really stupid. I think many people get involved with it because they want to look smart. but you show it very simply.
Even if it was all known, this info, and the math could be done to show ODDS of us getting here, would not mean that it did happen (even though we ARE here!)
If we die and there is no God, that would suck!
But if there is a God, why would he make all of this and then NOT make man and instead use evolution as the process to make man?
Seems inconsistant to me.
My dad uses a good example of two views that appear to show truth but only one is really true.

if you hit your thumb with a hammer 99 times it hurts 99 times.
two logics are formed
one says that if you hit it the next time it will hurt, because it has always hurt and it is the same action so the same thing should happen.
the other logic says it is not possible to be sure if it will hurt the next hit, because it has never been hit the 100th time before and maybe that is the number where everything changes.

both are logical and have some truth, but only one is right and i would not hit it again!

just because someday someone might find the real ODDS of life forming and not just life, but all its types and how they work so well together, does not means it happened that way because of this

What ar the odds that GOD existed and He made it all?
and how could you even start?
the information is also missing just like it is for this stuff!

2006-07-17 05:07:32 · answer #1 · answered by zero 2 · 1 0

the atoms don't come together randomly to create man. The atoms are directed in molecular form by DNA to get into the right shape and size. Even planets aren't 'random', they slowly form over billions of years, and some don't make it! They are disrupted, don't have enough matter, have too much matter, etc...

You are also simplifying about 1 billion years of evolution into "man and woman randomly appear". That is so illogical as to have no meaning at all in this argument. Nobody says airplanes or people randomly appear out of nothing.

Of course we don't know every step of the process, nobody thinks we do. But that's no reason to say current ideas are false.

We didn't get the germ theory for thousands of years either. Imagine life if we had just given up? Seriously, imagine life right now with no medicine, polio vaccine, smallpox vaccine, antibiotics, etc... Aren't u glad science kept at it?

2006-07-16 20:34:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

only matter can exsist in our laws of universal physics but in other universes others can and they are infinte here and there just the laws of the diffrent speeds of light that allow diffrent typers of matter

2006-07-16 23:31:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think it's because they have expectations of someday finding out what they don't know, but saying ' i do not know' doesn't sound 'positive'.

2006-07-16 18:53:55 · answer #4 · answered by kool_aid 3 · 0 0

Are you on drugs?

2006-07-16 18:57:15 · answer #5 · answered by James H 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers