Physics - July 2006

subject of Ancient Science
source:
http://www.geocities.com/numerals1234

2006-07-15 22:13:07 · 1 answers · asked by Butt 1

2006-07-15 22:08:10 · 8 answers · asked by katwishi 2

2006-07-15 20:58:30 · 3 answers · asked by Indrajit C 1

I'm interested in making an anti-gravity device. Is it possible? What is the current available information surrounding the subject?

2006-07-15 20:16:55 · 10 answers · asked by skidlyparker 1

2006-07-15 20:06:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it true that a hydrogen bomb can be made indefinitely large? And given materials available on Earth, can a Hydrogen bomb be made to destroy entire planets?

2006-07-15 19:54:59 · 8 answers · asked by trafficer21 4

2006-07-15 19:20:27 · 19 answers · asked by NITIN M 1

articles should be free,i have searched at google scholor but those are not free and i like wikipedia.other than these two sites will be highly appreciated

2006-07-15 18:40:59 · 4 answers · asked by ghulamalimurtaza 3

My theory is that if we ever achieved time travel (to the past). there would be an instantaneous build-up of travelers coverging on every moment in time simultaneously(an ifinate number of travelers!)....I dreamed that this was how Black holes were formed....By the sudden collapse under that mass and that current black holes were Civilizations that achieved time travel.

2006-07-15 17:34:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

1.A rocket ship is on its way to the moon at 15600 mi/h when it is alerted that a second ship is observed 1000 mi away (viewed at an angle 30o from the line of motion of the rocket ship). The second ship is traveling at 9000 mi/h and will cross the path of the first ship at right angles. Are they on collision path? If so how much time does the command pilot of the first rocket ship have to take evasive action?

2006-07-15 17:24:55 · 6 answers · asked by gen 2

please help me...thank u very much!!

2006-07-15 17:21:08 · 6 answers · asked by gen 2

The hypothetical hole is dug straight down, through the center of the earth, and out the other side. My theory is that the object will fall into the hole, and its momemtum will take it somewhat past the center of the earth. It will then fall in the opposite direction somewhat less past the center than previously. This will continue somewhat like a pendulum coming to rest until the object eventually is suspended in the hole at the center of the earth. If anyone can offer the scientific principles that either prove or disprove my theory, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

2006-07-15 16:59:05 · 9 answers · asked by Brian S 3

2 recievers using 1/4 wavelength antennae ,both at an equal distance greater than 10 wavelengths from the transmitter.

would 1 reciever pick up the transmission or would both? assume air as the medium.

2006-07-15 16:27:17 · 4 answers · asked by robertkey60 1

2006-07-15 15:34:13 · 13 answers · asked by maskmanmikep@verizon.net 1

Hint it's the hypothetical smallest unit of energy in the universe.

2006-07-15 15:29:15 · 6 answers · asked by Hymn 2

, what happens if you strap buttered bread to a cat's back?

2006-07-15 15:26:01 · 11 answers · asked by Its not me Its u 7

2006-07-15 15:10:01 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

How extensive, "wide" or "thick" are the barriers and spheres of influence (existence)? What sort of energy make up these barriers and transition zones between individual (or parallel) Universes? The energy created when they meet creates a new Universe? Can a humanly comprehensible system of measurement have a true meaning when considering infinite Universes (if they are so)?

2006-07-15 14:40:22 · 4 answers · asked by afriendof CLIFFy D 2

I asked this question some time agao and got good answers in terms of the way our eyes work, perspective, angles etc., etc.,...
I was told it was simple trigonometry and also asked "had I got a brain'?.
Well yes I have and the problem here seems to be the way I word my question.
Whilst I understand all your answers about angles etc., they seem to miss the point of my question....
Answers containing reference to things such as angles, field of view and perspective, seem to start at a point where you have already accepted that things appear smaller the further away they are and the human perception of them, but this is the very foundation of my queston, WHY do they appear smaller?
We have all been taught this fact since childhood, but go on to blindly accept it.
All I am asking is why?
My primary (and secondary) school teacher would have realy struggled with this one...
Can anyone offer any other insight?
Anyone really understand the question?

2006-07-15 14:25:03 · 16 answers · asked by THINKER 2

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html
how does this movie affect you? what do you think?

2006-07-15 14:14:44 · 6 answers · asked by someone special 4

2006-07-15 14:12:26 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

1 foot by 1 foot square 1"thick

2006-07-15 14:03:49 · 2 answers · asked by John F 1

The atom is a composition of subatomic particles, like proton, neutrons and electrons, which in turn are composed of even tinier particles likes quarks and leptons. My body in turn is composed of organic molecules, which are essentially groups of atoms.

If I were to shrink my consciousness, to travel the depth of an atom, and go as deep as I can possibly go, I imagine there will be no end to this depth, because I am imagining that everything is made of something, and that something as well is essentially composed of something else. Anyone here agrees to this?

Also a neutrino which is the smallest known particle, can pass right though the earth and out the other side without colliding with another particle, much like traveling a galaxy with atoms and molecules in proportion to the planets and galaxies.

Aside from the fact that I need to get a life...any other comments.?

2006-07-15 14:02:08 · 8 answers · asked by synapse 4

I am working on my college chemistry class and I am stuck on these questions.

At 2.00 m from a radioactive source the intensity of its gamma radiation is 307 roentgen. What is the intensity at a distance of 37.6m?

At 3.00 m from a radioactive source the intensity of its gamma radiation is 230 roentgen. How far away would we need to be to breduce the intensity to 5.19 roentgen?

2006-07-15 13:24:43 · 1 answers · asked by blynn 1

Scientific faith?

2006-07-15 13:04:21 · 2 answers · asked by goring 6

Ane excited atom decays to its ground state and emits a photon of green light if instead the atom decays to an intermediate state the light emitted could be :A - violet B - white C - blue D - red .

2006-07-15 11:56:30 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

A - neutrons
B - valence electrons
C - protons
D - nucleons

2006-07-15 11:41:56 · 0 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-15 11:35:27 · 2 answers · asked by thepaxilman 2

2006-07-15 10:47:46 · 37 answers · asked by halloween_of_86@sbcglobal.net 1

Would the fluid provide enough resistance to the flesh to accelerate it at roughly the same speed as the surrounding mass, and protect it from massive g-force damage?

2006-07-15 10:17:09 · 10 answers · asked by ian_eadgbe 3