English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My theory is that if we ever achieved time travel (to the past). there would be an instantaneous build-up of travelers coverging on every moment in time simultaneously(an ifinate number of travelers!)....I dreamed that this was how Black holes were formed....By the sudden collapse under that mass and that current black holes were Civilizations that achieved time travel.

2006-07-15 17:34:53 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

10 answers

I think this is what ghosts are. Not a dead spirit reliving an event, but people looking back and seeing the event over and over.

2006-07-15 17:38:39 · answer #1 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0 0

It's not a new concept. In the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams suggested that time travel was simultaneously invented at all times. Whatever simultaneous means when you're talking about time travel is up for grabs.

The fact that we are not overrun with time travelers from the future suggests to me that 1) it's impossible or so difficult it might as well be, 2) their technology is so good that we don't notice them or 3) there are some very, very good reasons we don't understand why people from the future choose not to time travel back here. Maybe they don't want to muck up their history or perhaps it's just so confusing it's not worth it...

By the way, black holes (or other supermassive objects) are probably the method by which time travel happens, rather than the result of time travel. See below for a link on time machines which actually work with modern physics. We just can't make any of them yet. And I mean, we REALLY can't make them yet.

2006-07-16 00:59:42 · answer #2 · answered by foofoo19472 3 · 0 0

I believe that you might have a valid point! people born all the time to a person that just died like a promised body upon being born and a old soul in return so if both did exist in the same time frame and plain that we live in it would be a paradox and both people would cease to exist. so yea black holes might be the door way to the person that died to heaven or hell or the person that created it or where ever or what he/she is thinking or other outside forces.

yea I am a deep thinker too dreamweaver10@verizon.net

another word on this like another person said it would take so much engery it he is right it would. it has happened a star explodes and forms a black hole how about the engery releised when a person is killed (The one being killed) Grusum thought
it create a doorway to the other side blackhole?

2006-07-16 00:51:23 · answer #3 · answered by Paul G 5 · 0 0

I don't think its flawed, I agree if man could travel back in time and this was discovered in the future even thousands of years from now we would know because someone probably traveled into our time period or sooner. unless this theory was factored into time travel and was limited by the frequency and era of that witch to be travel led, in this case we may not have caught up to the year of the first time travel experience.

2006-07-16 01:48:11 · answer #4 · answered by David M 2 · 0 0

Time travel is impossible, to the past at least. Here's the scenario. You're in the future with a time machine. You go back in time and kill the guy who made it, before he made it. Then it was never invented and you could never have went back in time to kill him. Then you would go back to your time, without a time machine, and forget the reality created by time machines. So the time machine was never invented.

But if you wanna go to the future, you have to go incredibly fast so you won't age. This is a fact. If you go the speed of light for 1 second in a space ship and land back on earth, thousands of years will have past, but you will have the same age.

2006-07-16 03:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by Super M 1 · 0 0

time travel should be impossible if for no other reason than it would add to the energy of the universe at the point in time that the traveler arrived.(you know since matter is energy etc..) since energy is neither created nor destroyed. can someone elaborate on this or counter it?

2006-07-16 01:08:53 · answer #6 · answered by robertkey60 1 · 0 0

first of all is time linear? if it is then its imposible to travle in time. but if we can travel back in time it would probly take so much energy that it could couse the planet to collapse in on its self.

secound is time for you the same as time is for me? philisophical eh well if time is diffrent for each person then it could be possible to travel back in to but would you have to remove a person from that time in order to be their?

2006-07-16 00:41:27 · answer #7 · answered by ah64dtk 4 · 0 0

Sounds like you're talking about heaven. Just imagine how filled up that place will be if everyone who thinks they're gonna get there will

Thanks,
Buster

2006-07-16 00:42:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hmmm, I don't know of anyone's ever having travelled into the past ...

flawed?

somehow the term "non-sequitor" come to mind

not really "flawed", just not really compelling argument

2006-07-16 00:41:21 · answer #9 · answered by atheistforthebirthofjesus 6 · 0 0

It is not flawed because there are no flaws. Acceptance is the only beauty. Simplicity is a voyage.

2006-07-16 00:38:52 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers