The advent of CAD and existence of Specifications does not change the need for the Sequence suggested because in normal working on sites amendments are made and instructions given by say, Agents to Sub-contractors, which because they are relatively minor would not warrant an immediate revision and distribution of the drawing. If at the end of the contract such data is not included in the 'as built' drawings (if they are produced!) then should there be a difference of opinion (such as 'Who pays?') and a judgement as to the interpretation and timing of the change is required there has to be such a Sequence.
The sequence described in my first question may not be accurate but such a sequence was established by a judge when settling such a dispute and hence my question - who was the judge? and/or what was the case?
2007-08-08
02:51:34
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous