Politics - 18 November 2007

Why or why not

2007-11-18 17:11:38 · 14 answers · asked by screw ball 3

*tries out there? Sweden is a good example. Are the people who oppose this system only do so because they are rich capitalists and like exploiting their workers and think they deserve billions while the workers deserve minimum wage?

2007-11-18 17:05:34 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

so?

2007-11-18 16:40:59 · 15 answers · asked by Love Me♥ 2

Its okay to make a point but why make your point with made up figures?

2007-11-18 16:13:47 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

My boyfriend says it is really good place to live there. He wants me to move there with him, but all I hear is people saying it is a bad place to live in, so is it really?

2007-11-18 16:04:22 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-18 15:59:50 · 17 answers · asked by Kelly B 4

2007-11-18 15:59:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-18 15:57:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

When I see posts by people who suggest Bush is a war criminal and should be imprisoned, and comments like confiscate all the companies assets that are involved in Iraq I have to ask the American left - what is the difference between your positions and Hugo Chavez's regime?

Does this mean you will imprison those who politically disagree with you? Does it mean you plan to nationalize corporations you don't like? Is that the agenda of the American left?

2007-11-18 15:45:00 · 12 answers · asked by netjr 6

2007-11-18 15:08:30 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

.
?????
What also is your guess as to the price of gas this time next year?

2007-11-18 15:06:01 · 7 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

2007-11-18 15:05:23 · 15 answers · asked by BUSH/ISRAEL =warcriminal 5

2007-11-18 14:59:37 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

,
election?
and if so, what advice would you give to him or her?

2007-11-18 14:55:42 · 6 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

Iran's Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said in a written proposal that a final declaration by OPEC leaders, who arrive here Saturday for a two-day summit, should express concern by member states over the fall of the US dollar.
Reacting to the request, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal Saudi Arabia's foreign minister warned that mentioning the falling dollar could lead to the "collapse" of the US currency.
"There are media people outside waiting to catch this point and they will add to it (exaggerate) and we may find that the dollar collapses," he said.
Member states should express concern over "the continued depreciation of the US dollar" in the final declaration, Mottaki said.

2007-11-18 14:54:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will you accept them, or will you reject them no matter what the consequences?

2007-11-18 14:45:35 · 15 answers · asked by LadyZania 7

2007-11-18 14:24:32 · 22 answers · asked by a person of interest 5

2007-11-18 14:22:09 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

it basically makes bush dictator indefinitely in the event of a "catastrophe" (particularly if around election time)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

2007-11-18 14:17:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Wouldn't it be better if we get rid of money, but instead distrubuted equal amount of basic resources to everyone, so that one person doesn't get more based on rank or job, but instead we are equal?

2007-11-18 14:12:09 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-18 14:05:38 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

request the culinary staff to keep an over sized drum converted to be a BBQ in the rose garden?

2007-11-18 14:03:07 · 12 answers · asked by screw ball 3

Like I see alot of Democrats hating on Bush but see Republicans standing beside him. BTW I'm Independent.

2007-11-18 14:01:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

or that scientists publish wacko theories because it earns them cash?

for one, scientists who speak out against AGW still get grants. in fact, they get paid MORE than scientists who support the AGW theory -- exxon mobile will fund just about any scientist who speaks out against it.

two, if the scientists were simply publishing inflammatory work for cash, doesn't it seem ironic that it's mainly only happening in one field (climatology)? besides, it's not really inflammatory work when just about ALL the other work out there supports the exact same conclusion. if anything, if they were publishing inflammatory material, wouldn't it go AGAINST the consensus, wouldn't it be anti-AGW work???? lastly, scientists only get a ton of cash (in grant money, that is) for wacko theories if they stand and pass peer review. they're not going to get any money for saying some random thing. they have to support their "wacko theory"

2007-11-18 13:59:36 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Pros? Cons? Some of those people will have to be scraped from their chairs like barnacles...

2007-11-18 13:59:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-18 13:58:27 · 11 answers · asked by Darth Nihilus 5

2007-11-18 13:57:18 · 13 answers · asked by Cyrus 2

2007-11-18 13:57:04 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

im against abortion but i would like to consider myself pro choice. am i?

2007-11-18 13:54:14 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Taking bush's approval rating can that many Americans be wrong. Granted there are many circumstances where the overwhelming Majority can be wrong, but is this one of those cases?

2007-11-18 13:52:08 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous