By the time the government got to the point of insisting that every person have one inserted in them that would be the least of your problems.
The problem is that you already carry so many of them they do not even need to "implant" them.
If you carry a cell phone? They can not only find you but turn it on and listen to what you say even though you do not. Almost anything you buy at the store has them, as do any of those convenient "wave at the machine" credit gadgets, as well as many permanent parking cards, and the prepaid tollway gadgets you get at the store.
Avoiding them would not be as expensive or lifestyle changing as getting off the electrical grid but we are getting there.
An remember that the only places Big Brother really watched were the places you would go to avoid him, as that was the only time folks were working against him.
2007-11-20 01:23:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by No Bushrons 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
long in the past interior the day, technology Fiction author Robert A Heinlein observed that any society state-of-the-paintings sufficient to require id had already lengthy gone too some distance. so some distance, each and every thing the authorities (or employer) is well-known with about you, it got here upon out from you. You left a paper path. Chips replace that from voluntary to mandatory trailing 'paper'. you may want to have observed a concerted attempt to force us remote from money. money is nameless. As for Rev 13, you'll observe it would not say one of those element as all and assorted getting a similar volume. What good might want to that do? yet no longer being waiting to purchase or promote with out the kind of YOUR call is actual understood in a cashless society. How better to make certain obedience? All i'm able to say is, there are not sufficient police officials to positioned us all down or all in detention center. There are not sufficient courts, no longer sufficient orange jumpsuits. So for this reason i anticipate it is going to likely be finished subtly, such that the vast majority of people received't suggestions filing, possibly it is going to likely be offered as a convenience. for sure the non secular objectors first must be made to look like fringe wackos, so the overall inhabitants received't take them heavily. Oh, wait, that already happened. ok, we are doomed.
2016-10-24 11:24:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against
2007-11-19 01:54:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by BOOM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against
2007-11-18 14:53:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by hawk_barry 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
can you say "mark of the beast"?
it's just that "people" these days when they get a little power, they just want more and more-
Hey ya s'pose your insurance will get the info about your grocery store habits - and refuse to treat your heart condition because yu been eatin' too much cheese and ice cream-
don't be surprized when it happens someday -
if you donate some shoes to charity and the person who gets em commits a crime and they track the footprints back to your data files -
you can take some time off work to argue and defend yourself legally - won't that be fun?
2007-11-19 07:23:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by omnimog 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Completely, unabatedly, totally AGAINST.
And I will NEVER get the National ID, and they'll have to KILL me to put a chip in.
If you give in and accept the National ID, it's just a hop-skip-and a jump away from the chip.
Here's a hint, people:
IF EVERYONE REFUSES TO ACCEPT THE NATIONAL ID, UNCLE SAM WILL HAVE NO CHOICE.
2007-11-19 00:58:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Against. If that chip becomes law, I can see an armed uprising occuring.
2007-11-19 01:01:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
RFID chips I hear can track where things are. I wouldn't want them, that's creepy.
2007-11-18 14:54:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Manuel B 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
It sounds to me as though they are trying to create a race of obedient clones, fearful of any independent move, always aware that Big Brother is watching! No, no, no! It's not for me...or any spirited, freedom-loving American!
2007-11-19 01:37:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Me, Too 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm against it.
I pay taxes to the government now so the wont take my house.
2007-11-18 23:27:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋