Politics - 24 October 2007

What social injustice or economic inequality caused the wildfire to act out in such a manner?

2007-10-24 10:47:45 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

... motivations?

What causes this kind of… disconnect, hate and malcontent?

Why not instead be satisfied that the response logistics have been fine tuned and hope they get better as we learn?

2007-10-24 10:33:59 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071024/pl_nm/iraq_usa_funding_dc

2007-10-24 10:17:19 · 20 answers · asked by Darth Vader 6

2007-10-24 10:12:41 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

seriously, im sure my political ignorance is showing...but ive always wondered this is.they seem to be a people of self reliance, and to me it seems that the right definately supports the individual and his abilities to succeed much more readily. it dosent make much sense to me. could you breifly explain generally why this is?
thank you :)

2007-10-24 10:12:05 · 11 answers · asked by dali333 7

Can't the libs come up with something better when debating the merits of the war? Apparently not.

2007-10-24 10:07:53 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Now that it has been firmly established that, at the time of her outing, she was DEFINITELY covert and working on WMD, particularly Iraq, issues;and that she had worked overseas and as a NOC for many years; can anyone still justify what the Bush Whitehouse, particularly Libby, Rove, Armitage, Cheney and, possibly Bush, did to undermine our national security and destroy the career of a dedicated covert CIA agent? Not to mention the many worldwide agents and operations that were compromised, conceivably killed, through their political vendetas? I look forward to the right wing nutcases that will inform me of some new, creative justifications for what was done. And please don't waste my time or yours by continuing to deny that she was both covert and a courageous American

2007-10-24 10:06:57 · 17 answers · asked by golfer7 5

Libs talk about Conservatives and how this is "our" war. Are there absolutely no libs serving in our armed forces?

I mean, our military is voluntary. If there are libs, why are they there? It's not like we have the draft as we did when the Democrats took over the Vietnam police action and turned it into a full-blown war.
You would think a few libs would have enlisted if nothing else but for the FREE college and government benefits?

2007-10-24 10:05:30 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 09:52:03 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

A young TV consultant is hired by the President of a bankrupt USA to organize a telethon in order to prevent the country from being repossessed by wealthy Native Americans.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americathon

2007-10-24 09:40:40 · 3 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

Boxer blames Bush for insufficient resources to fight the fire.
Doesn't she realize that this is almost entirely a function of state and local government? Yet, Bush is sending federal help due to the unprecedented nature of the fire.

2007-10-24 09:36:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 09:34:43 · 20 answers · asked by Liberal City 6

Libs welfare has put survival of the fittest in reverse.

Now instead of survival of the fittest, we have survival of the weakest and laziest.

All the colored races around the world are multiplying like cockroaches while the white race is dying off.

And why? Because of lib welfare world wide together with lib abortions for white children.

2007-10-24 09:31:27 · 17 answers · asked by libs are traitors 1

opinions only please, no "bashing"

2007-10-24 09:30:10 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 09:27:40 · 15 answers · asked by o.j. 1

per year will be the interest payments on the 2.4 trillion borrowed to finance this war, thats if the interest is at only 3%....... Is this being fiscally conservative?

2007-10-24 09:11:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

By ANNE FLAHERTY, Associated Press Writer
54 minutes ago


WASHINGTON - Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan could cost as much as $2.4 trillion through the next decade, according to a new analysis Wednesday that the White House brushed off as "speculation."

ADVERTISEMENT

The analysis, by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, provides the most comprehensive and far-reaching estimate to date, taking into account costs previously not counted and assuming large number of forces would remain in the regions.

According to CBO, the U.S. has spent about $600 billion to date on both wars, including $39 billion in diplomatic operations and foreign aid.

If the U.S. cuts the number of troops deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan to 75,000 six years from now, it would cost the U.S. another $1 trillion for military and diplomatic operations and $705 billion in interest payments to pay for the wars through 2017.

Democrats say voters won't stand for it, and so they would consider pay

2007-10-24 09:08:28 · 8 answers · asked by ahedou2 4

I wanted to know what is the deal with skulls and bones? I heard about it and never really could find out to much info on it anyone know anything about it.
Thanks

2007-10-24 09:07:58 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

To the "Cronies" ?

Whose face will they use instead of the Indian?

2007-10-24 08:58:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071024/pl_nm/iraq_usa_funding_dc

2007-10-24 08:50:30 · 9 answers · asked by ningis n 1

Think that it was right to invade Iraq?
Think that George Bush is a good president?
Think that Rush is right?
Like Sean Hannity?
Think that Bill Oreilly displays good Christian qualities in his personality?
Complain that liberals are too compassionate?
Enjoy having lunch with Michael Weiner savage, and tell him how great a Christian Character he has?
Support the use of torture?

Or whatever else you can think to ask him. WWJD if he were watching the News in America?

2007-10-24 08:42:25 · 32 answers · asked by Earl Grey 5

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071024/pl_nm/usa_politics_democrats_dc

Apparently, immigration could be their Achilles Heel...

2007-10-24 08:23:31 · 13 answers · asked by SQD 2

Please don't use something he's done in the past, what will he do in the future that you support?

2007-10-24 08:16:46 · 36 answers · asked by Zardoz 7

Poor Bill...he actually has good credentials, but it has to hurt when a satirist is beating you out for the presidency

2007-10-24 08:16:17 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 08:09:15 · 20 answers · asked by realitycheck 3

They constantly claim to have suge huge ratings and to be so much better connected to the American people. Why won't they run? Is it possibly that everyone thinks they are pieces of trash and listen to their political pornography as entertainment only?

2007-10-24 08:03:43 · 21 answers · asked by Earl Grey 5

Is it in their blood to hate America?

2007-10-24 07:59:25 · 7 answers · asked by libs are traitors 1

...or is my buddy Jilisa just lying to me?

2007-10-24 07:53:35 · 5 answers · asked by Elia 1

Another victory for the Republicans? Illegal aliens are not going to be given citizenship!!! Good or bad & Why?

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-immig25oct25,1,39366.story?track=crosspromo&coll=la-headlines-nation&ctrack=1&cset=true

2007-10-24 07:48:51 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've noticed that many conservatives are against the concept of political correctness...which I have to agree, can be overblown at times. Free speech should be free speech right?
However, why is it that when a PAC like Moveon.org publishes an ad attacking Petreus, suddenly it's not PC to question a uniformed officer. Well? Either you support free speech or you don't. What is it?

2007-10-24 07:41:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous