STEPHEN COLBERT
2007-10-24 09:34:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by HMS88 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Republican nominee - simply because the democrats have over played their hand in bashing every single war effort this administration has implemented or proposed.
They don't have a clue how much their non-support for our efforts in Iraq and their anti-war rhetoric has cost them AND America, but they will learn in 2008.
For instance, America simply asked that the democrats give the surge a chance to work - and what did we get? Kennedy, "This is George Bush's Viet Nam." Reid, "The United States has lost the war." And initiative after initiative demanding we pull the troops out or, worse, tell the enemy when we are leaving.
It is no wonder the American people have grown weary of this war - the media has downplayed every successful gain we have achieved in Iraq and failed to report recent statements by both Hillary and OBama that they cannot be sure the troops would be withdrawn in their first terms. These statements should have been all over tha newspapers - but they weren't simply because that's not the message that the democrats want to be put out to their base.
The Democrats have been on the wrong sidelines cheering the wrong team for far too long and I believe the American people are waking up to this fact.
2007-10-24 16:54:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Romney.
The Neo-Cons sat out the 2006 election for two reasons.
1. They were mad at Bush for not being a conservative like he said he was.
2. They wanted the Democrats to have enough rope to hang themselves.
They will not sit out the 2008 election and every indication is that they will endorse Romney. If he dosen't do anything stupid between now and then, I will work on his campaign.
2007-10-24 17:30:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Do you mean the election for Prez?
Obviously, HIllary has already won. The only way she can lose is if she fails to pick Obama as her Veep and he runs as an independent.
That would steal away enough of the black vote that Hill would lose.
2007-10-24 16:36:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by mikeburns55 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
Whoever is the Democrat nominee. GWB has all but guaranteed a Democrat in the White House, and a majority in both houses.
2007-10-24 16:36:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Hillary Clinton, because the people are sick of Republicans.
2007-10-24 16:54:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by wolf 6
·
1⤊
2⤋