Politics - 24 October 2007

I personally find it pathetic that he and the democratic party are playing politics, but what's even worse is the simple fact the he DENIED even saying such a thing..... BUT guess what it was CAUGHT on TAPE!

There are hundreds and hundreds of people who are hurting right now and all the dem's can do is try to boost their own agenda....

This is a national tragedy and we need to stand and help our fellow americans and NOT PLAY POLITICS!!!!

2007-10-24 15:11:16 · 18 answers · asked by angie c 2

America's problems with the Middle East?

No more Western/Wailing wall, no more Temple Mount/ Solomon's Temple, no more Dome of the Rock, & no more Israel-Palestinian conflict.

2007-10-24 15:06:01 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The state and local response stands in sharp contrast to the emotional and logistical collapse of Ray Nagin and Kathleen Blanco. Will those two, at last, get the humiliation they so richly deserve?

2007-10-24 14:52:47 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

With the exception of a misread 2nd amendment, what is the biggest argument against gun controll?

Serious answers please.

And since people will shout about the 'misread 2nd amendment' comment:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
We have the police, we don't need the Minute men.

2007-10-24 14:47:30 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Seriously, really.

2007-10-24 14:40:13 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous

Lobbyists, Dems, Reps, Pick 'em. Forums like this could actually change something, and they have a lot to lose.

2007-10-24 14:37:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do we not OWE the residents of California the same treatment as we gave to the citizens of New Orleans?

Does Sean Penn get a trailer too?

2007-10-24 14:31:59 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

what is it?
Is it still in affect?
why is it unconstitutional?
What do you think about the act?

2007-10-24 14:30:24 · 1 answers · asked by junheo01 1

America wasn't

2007-10-24 14:24:06 · 14 answers · asked by Sappy J 1

The California wild fires started on October 20th. Federal aid was not deployed to help until Oct. 22nd. and the President isn't even scheduled to arrive in the area until Oct. 25th.

San Diego being one of the hardest hit areas and being predominately white... does GW hate white people too?

Or is it that he allowed the state to handle state issues UNTIL Governor Schwarzenegger requested the help from the federal Government following proper proceedures. Just look at how it is handled..

10/21/2007
Governor Schwarzenegger Proclaims State of Emergency in Southern California Counties Due to Wildfires
http://gov.ca.gov/index.php?/press-release/7788/

10/22/2007
Governor Schwarzenegger Orders California National Guard to Southern California Fires
http://gov.ca.gov/index.php?/press-release/7797/

10/22/2007
Governor Schwarzenegger Requests Modular Airborne Fire Fighting Systems to Assist in Fighting Southern California Fires

2007-10-24 14:21:22 · 13 answers · asked by That Guy 5

2007-10-24 14:11:31 · 13 answers · asked by Yesssssss!!!! 5

Before you read I just want to say that I am not attacking anyone or any group.

In my U.S. Hisotry class, the teacher talks alot about these two parties. He is a Da*n proud Conservative, I am Sixteen and I like politics and for some reason, I see myself as a Conservative.
I undestand that a Liberals wants to put money into poor peoples laps (Welfare right?) While I understand that some people do need it, a lot of them just take advantage of it in a negative way. Shouldn't we check up on the people that are recieving this tax money that WE earn? Shoudn't this tax money be put into training and educating the poor, so they could live on their own.
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime”—Author unknown.

Have liberals never heard of this?


Thanks

2007-10-24 14:11:30 · 8 answers · asked by NavySEALs 1

(I bet Hillary and the Dems have no idea why that won't work. Did any of them actually pay attention in economics class?)

2007-10-24 14:08:03 · 26 answers · asked by junglejoe 2

2007-10-24 13:53:34 · 15 answers · asked by WhydoIdothis 3

Way back in college, I came upon reading the Constitution. In running for Presidency,Senator and other political position the qualifications stated at least 35 years of age, can read and write....it's just similar to applying for an ordinary job! Can it be revised? Can't it have more higher qualifications like someone whose got a good leadership skill, a master's degree and with all the intelligence? etc? Most politicians never even had or finished college, for pete's sake! something fit for a good politician. It's a waste if we keep having elections only to find out in the long run that we elected the wrong candidate then we go for another Edsa. Look what our county's experiencing now.

2007-10-24 13:41:03 · 6 answers · asked by vallie 2

2007-10-24 13:39:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hillary Clinton has been involved in so many scandals ,that
one has to wonder if the people who are polled by
various entities such as CNN/Time-Warner are former
members of Bill Clinton's Administration .

2007-10-24 13:39:02 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 13:39:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Nothing.
And then they claim they RIGHTFULLY belong in San Diego, California, and USA?
I don't think they know what the word "belong" means.
Only Americans have helped the victims of the fires, and showed brother/sisterhood. Isn't this reason enough to say "illegals go home, you are not, and never will be one of us?"

2007-10-24 13:36:14 · 13 answers · asked by xenypoo 7

2007-10-24 13:32:51 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-10-24 13:29:41 · 16 answers · asked by WhydoIdothis 3

Describe the political spectrum. What is it? why do we use it?

2007-10-24 13:26:22 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

- 1 being the most "liberal" of the cities
- how about in terms of a) historical voting trends and b) social values
- you may explain if you wish

2007-10-24 13:20:27 · 5 answers · asked by meco031719 3

Go Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-YX994PmhI

2007-10-24 13:16:21 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Americans would like to believe that heh typical American voter is active in politics and rational and educated about political issues. Is this an accurate belief?

2007-10-24 13:14:51 · 8 answers · asked by Nina 1

A good question, but one that, aparently, someone doesn't want me to answer, or even view.

So, I guess I'll ask it myself...

2007-10-24 13:05:56 · 18 answers · asked by B.Kevorkian 7

Everyone would be required to dress the same, everyone gets paid equally regardless of job or rank, everyone gets treated with the same care (education, heath, and food) equally, even if it's just basics, nobody is treated superior or inferior, everyone is told what to do and everyone has the same rights, etc. So, do you think it would be ideal? Would you like to live in this world? Why or why not?

2007-10-24 12:59:16 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

See link: http://www.rense.com/general58/sig.htm

Why is here defending the Jewish race globally and not any other races? I'm not suggesting it's bad, but why it's exclusivity? Being the president of America, should his main interest be to defend Americans globally and not of a certain race??

and why is 'anti-semitism' even a word? why is there no word for racism against whites, blacks, asians, hispanics...??

2007-10-24 12:57:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or would he end up in the Guiness book for biggest wedgie?

2007-10-24 12:52:05 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

And if it's such a racist policy, why does it apply to women as well?

2007-10-24 12:49:28 · 12 answers · asked by Liberal City 6