How can libs be for evolution and for welfare at the same time?

Question

Libs welfare has put survival of the fittest in reverse.

Now instead of survival of the fittest, we have survival of the weakest and laziest.

All the colored races around the world are multiplying like cockroaches while the white race is dying off.

And why? Because of lib welfare world wide together with lib abortions for white children.

Answer 1

Why is it when there is a flame war going on between conservativism and liberalism, or republicans and democrats, it always seems to be a conservative flaming liberalism or a republican flaming democrats? It sure sounds like a sign of maturity.

While I don't cherish abortion (I prefer birth control), I find that liberalism tends to be the radical idea that people who are not white, conservative Christian, republican, and heterosexual men are people too.

But hey, I am an asexual (leaning towards gay) atheist, so what do I know?

Answer 2

I doubt you will find one lib on here that thinks the welfare system is perfect or even should continue in the state it is in right now.

Survival of the fittest... Let's talk about that a bit.

How in the heck can you tell someone 50 years ago that they can't go to college because of the color of their skin. Then tell them that they can't get a job or a loan for the same reason? How can you start a successful lineage with no money (descendents of slaves), no education, and no way of changing?

Slowly. Which is the progress of the black Americans.

Blacks weren't equal in the above until the 90's. Whites have had a 120 year head start on us in societal development.

You can't talk about survival of the fittest when you give one set of people 100 year head start.

By the way, do you have any idea what a black man (or woman) could do with a college degree 30 years ago? Neither can I cause they couldn't get a job. So why go? So if you charge the same money for rent, food, charge more for a car note (loans), don't give them charge accounts, shouldn't we make more at a job than whites? How do we get through life making less and having higher bills? And you wonder why some people sell drugs and rob and steal?

And to all you people that seem surprised by the roach comment, he's a con, what do you expect? You don't think the KKK votes Democrat these days do you?

Answer 3

That's an interesting question. I'll ignore the imbecilic rant at the end and treat the first question.

As a liberal, I really can't think of a good reason to have welfare in its current state. It was established after the Great Depression so it's really a carry over from that and then it was expanded into what it is today. What it is today is overly abused, inefficient in doing what it was drawn up to do--help to get a family back on their feet after some tragedy, and finally supportive of keeping impoverished people down by removing welfare (income) if you get a crappy job or go back to school. I think people have gotten used to it now so, there isn't a move to abolish it. I'd say that it's sold to the public as being something very different than it is in practice which is why it is supported.

That said, there should be a system in place to protect people in a capitalistic society from losing their job due to competition. That's just being a decent human being. I'd be fully supportive of a welfare program IF it were to have a lifetime dollar value cap and a time limit irregardless of # of dependents or whatever.

I'd argue that's why most liberals are for it--the idea that we are all working together and not simply out for ourselves and screw anyone who isn't. Incidentally, I think that's what social conservatives want as well, just they don't want to be made to pay for it. I guess as a liberal I just don't care that much about that tiny chunk of my paycheck if it helps to pay for welfare--even with it's current problems. Despite those problems, there is incentive for people to generationally remove themselves from public assistance. After all, who wants to take their parents to school for career day and say, "My Mom is a welfare abuser."

Answer 4

Agreeing with evolution is not the same as rooting for it....there is no conflict in saying ....."I believe in evolution"......and saying.... " I think the right thing to do is to take care of those less fortunate than myself"


Also notice the last time welfare was overhauled in this country in a way that reduced it's roles....a democratic president was in power.... a better question would be....if the republicans really think welfare is wrong, why didnt they change it while they controlled congress and the whitehouse?

Answer 5

I'll paraphrase your question.

How can libs believe overwhelming evidence that indicates life evolved from single cell life on Earth and also believe that some people sometimes need financial help?

Now let me try to understand your quandary. Hmmm, I just can't see why these two things are related. I think you must have some type of brain damage.

Answer 6

Because Darwinism and Social Darwinism are two totally different things, and are generally found on different ends of the political spectrum. But your too dumb to understand that aren't you? I bet you didn't even know that those terms existed.
Oh and by the way.
Your a sick ignorant pig. Scientists have found nothing that makes people of different colors different genetically, so aside from darker skin, we are all the same.

Answer 7

Come on now, you can't really believe what you have just written there. Think about it a little harder, and try a question that will promote real discussion, rather than pointless shouting.

Answer 8

Your question was interesting. The follow up turned into racist garbage. As a conservative, I'm ashamed to have you on my side.

Answer 9

The same way you can claim to be a good Christian and be against welfare.

Answer 10

colored races? my goodness, what do you have against people who look different from you?

we "colored" folks arent ALL having children. keep your ignorance to yourself, unless your running for office, chump!