Politics - 12 August 2007

2007-08-12 11:47:05 · 16 answers · asked by rightofleft 2

Just wait till she gets her peroid. She may be all anti-war and crap but she'll end up Nuking Iraq because they picked the wrong time to piss her off. Thats why I'm voting for Hillary in 2008.

2007-08-12 11:40:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Look at elections in recent times. Jimmy Carter was a peanut farmer who nobody heard of nor cared about. My own grandfather recalled a story about being invited by a friend to meet Carter early in that Presidential race and he asked his friend "who the hell is Jimmy Carter?" and did not meet him. Carter was one of the biggest underdogs in that race. Ronald Reagan was a mediocre actor from California. George Bush Sr. was a senator and CIA director but still, he was not a celebrity. Bill Clinton was an average guy from one of the smallest and poorest states in the Union. Most people did not hear of him before and he was not popular at first. I expect to see someone besides Hillary Clinton, who more than half of Americans said they will never vote for in any circumstance, or Rudy Giuliani become President. I expect to see someone who is the rough equivalent of Mike Huckabee to win the race.

2007-08-12 11:38:54 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think it was purely coincidental that the pill that represented the option of allowing you to once again embrace your ignorance, blithely unaware that your little world is nothing but a grand fabrication was blue, and the pill that represented seeking the truth no matter what the cost was red? Is it a coincidence that red represents conservatives and blue represents liberals?

2007-08-12 11:37:07 · 8 answers · asked by Truly Amazing 2

They say this makes him a man of integrity and moral courage.

Bush also ignored public opinion on immigration, and held to a plan to make a way for illegal immigrants to become legal. Was this another example of a moral man doing what was morally right, even in the face broad opposition?

Or did Bush have his own private agenda and his own selfish reasons for the war in Iraq and his approach to illegal immigration? Was he ignoring the American people out of his integrity and love of truth? Or something far less virtuous?

2007-08-12 11:26:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

The left in its daily attacks and projection of fault to the right and to GWB who is with many falling of grace, Amnesty, Armenian genocide, Trying to deal with the left which is no deferent than the enemy we face of Islam. But the left is with them and we can not deal with the devil and they are a part of this plan. They on the left do not look in the mirror and see their lying teeth rooting away and the decay of the infected cancel that is with in them. Which we would and should call evil.

There are many names for this Narcissism, denial, and so on but the root cause is evil of itself. The degree with which it is no deferent than that of Hitler or Osama bin laden.

And when they are faced with the truth they attack and defect to profess that they are above it all that with which they have caused.

The left is pure evil. Quote from People of the lie by M. Scott Peck, MD
Evil and Sin " It is not the sins that per se that characterize evil people, rather it is the subtlety and persistence and consistency of their sins. This is because the central defect of evil is not the sin but the refusal to acknowledge it* taken from Jung as correctly ascribed evil to the failure to "meet the Shadow" ".

" If evil people cannot be defined by the illegality of their deeds or the magnitude of their sins, then how are we to define them? The answer is by the consistency of their sins. While usually subtle, their destructiveness is remarkably consistent. This is because those who have " crossed over the line" are characterized by their absolute refusal to tolerate the sense of their own sinfulness".

Ok note to the left you will not understand this but the people of the right will.

2007-08-12 11:25:16 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

Because of the diffrences between men and women and how they think and process information.

2007-08-12 11:19:20 · 16 answers · asked by docie555@yahoo.com 5

2007-08-12 11:18:03 · 5 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

They waited 8 mins to post it then stuck it in down the page instead of on top.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiacJH4Fy4o3BCvMCsKdqaXY7BR.?qid=20070812150501AAYge9t

2007-08-12 11:17:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Prior to invading Iraq?
After invading Iraq?

2007-08-12 11:11:09 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

Would you be okay with this?

And...

Do you think this has already happened? I mean, have be given up some freedoms in order to be safer?

2007-08-12 11:07:35 · 13 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

http://www.abortiontv.com/Misc/AbortionStatistics.htm#United%20States       

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions." --Adolf Hitler

Don't these two things show the left for what they really are?

Do you really want to vote democrat?

2007-08-12 11:05:01 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Or is that just good Captalism?

2007-08-12 11:02:31 · 11 answers · asked by Dangerous 2

2007-08-12 10:57:16 · 17 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

are liberals saying their solutions don't stand up to scrutiny? You folks have been trying to fix this for 40 yrs, why shouldn't we reject your ideas after failures as obvious as this?

http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-08-09sm2.html
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070809202217.9us2orhu&show_article=1

Let me guess, it's Bushes or some other conservatives fault. We've been using YOUR ideas because Liberals insisted they knew better.

Those of you on the fence, is this the party you want to vote for? Come on over to the republican side. We'll welcome you.

2007-08-12 10:56:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

...Yet when a conservative disagrees with them on an issue, the conservative is an idiot. That doesn't sound very tolerant or open minded to me.

2007-08-12 10:52:19 · 19 answers · asked by Dude #2369™ 4

and how is it affecting America's day to day business?

2007-08-12 10:47:50 · 6 answers · asked by Blessed 1

I know it would violate free enterprise and the such but if we did.

I think it would help the economy alot but what is your opinion?

2007-08-12 10:41:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

It's obvious to any sane person that the lieberals of today have done nothing EXCEPT criticize and condemn Republicans.

Per a lieberal who answered an earlier question, ..............................

"But anyone from either side who condemns the other clearly HATES America, becuase you hate half its citizens. I'll spend more time with the people who want to support, not destroy, this country, no matter their political party."

2007-08-12 10:38:03 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was planning an event with some of my friends in College Democrats, and I suggested that one of our planks that we talk about be amnesty for illegal immigrants. They said no one would ever come to our meetings if we so much as breathed that word. I know that Republicans are dead set against an amnesty (despite the fact that Reagan approved one), but why would it be a problem for Democrats like me? When did amnesty become a bad idea?

2007-08-12 10:33:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-12 10:33:19 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://immigrationcounters.com/ look at it before you talk

2007-08-12 10:29:45 · 7 answers · asked by evilmonk66 2

If we stay in we lose our identity and our freedom.

We become zones in a massive superstate, But if we pulled out what would be the choices for us?

2007-08-12 10:29:12 · 26 answers · asked by trish 5

And this is after the person who is being ratted out has done something which makes Bush angry? Why doesn't she just give the FULL list to the news agencies and be done with it?

I personally think that it is disgusting that they are holding 'stuff' over people's heads, and the second they step out of line they get ratted out.

2007-08-12 10:22:07 · 7 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6

2007-08-12 10:21:19 · 11 answers · asked by Dude #2369™ 4

I find it very interesting that Senator Vitter was exposed by the DC Madam less then 3 weeks after he spoke out against the amnesty bill and stated that giving amnesty to illegals would hurt the American worker. He stood up against big buisiness and stoop up FOR AMERICA! He refused to stand by Bush.

2007-08-12 10:17:08 · 8 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6

You say George W. Bush is 'Corrupt' and has done 'ILLEGAL' things while President. This is LAUGHABLE! How do I know?

1. The Democrats who control Congress don't think so. If they did, they have the power to impeach or at least make Bush testify. They Won't. Please Explain?

2. We have a FREE press in this country. Please tell me what reputable NEWPAPER editorial board has made the case for IMPEACHMENT? There are NONE. Why?

Why don't IMPORTANT people take your BASELESS acustions seriously? Because you are FULL of HOT air?

(I have posted on my 360 blog why Bush is a GREAT man and you LIBS are outvoted there to.)

2007-08-12 10:00:22 · 11 answers · asked by PNAC ~ Penelope 4

I paid 30 for it..well worth every penny...just wonder full..

2007-08-12 09:56:16 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

War is the business of the United States.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070812/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_operation_parabellum

2007-08-12 09:54:52 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Might as well get to the heart of it, hadn't we?

2007-08-12 09:54:42 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous