By lying about the Bush administration......?

Question

are liberals saying their solutions don't stand up to scrutiny? You folks have been trying to fix this for 40 yrs, why shouldn't we reject your ideas after failures as obvious as this?

http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-08-09sm2.html
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070809202217.9us2orhu&show_article=1

Let me guess, it's Bushes or some other conservatives fault. We've been using YOUR ideas because Liberals insisted they knew better.

Those of you on the fence, is this the party you want to vote for? Come on over to the republican side. We'll welcome you.

Answer 1

Liberals expect people to take responsibility for their own lives as well. I think they are going to have to take the rap for this themselves. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

Answer 2

Seven out of the last ten Presidents have been Republicans... they had control of both houses for 6 years. Blaming the other party is a bit cheap, although to be honest there's not much difference between the two.

I don't know why anyone who doesn't like the Bush administration would lie about it, especially when so much has turned out to be true.

Answer 3

Yes, we will accept all Democrats who have finally seen the true ways of your party. The Extreme Liberal Socialist have taken over the Party of the Democrats.
What have they accomplished after all the pre-election hype about passing their bills in the first 100 days of them taking over control. It is 8 MONTHS now, and try to list anything they have accomplished. All they have been doing the whole time is to try to tear down the Bush Administration. AND, they have failed in that ALSO!

Answer 4

The republicans controlled congress for 12 years. What proposals did they come up with to address this issue?

Which president signed the last "amnesty" bill into law?

Could the dems have done more? Of course. But the idea that the republicans have somehow been stymied by the democrats in their efforts to address the issue is beyond ridiculous.

Answer 5

Step away from the pipe friend, I am here for you. There is nothing wrong with conservatism or liberalism for that matter.
There is something wrong with supporting the Bush admin.These people are not conservatives they are cooperatives. They have set the ethics bar low. Are you going to keep it low when the opposition party is in control?

Answer 6

Science is great to refer to when it serves your purpose. I have been hearing for years the differences between a persons life growing up with and without a father around and it has been consistent. It is unfortunate that family values are not as important to politicians as they are to people who deal with the drawbacks of single family homes in everyday life. It's a tragedy really and as far as I'm concerned it's because of the catering to special interest groups that do not want the traditionaly family structure to stay be the norm in the USA. So, these people get what they want the rest of us have to deal with it.
I think it is Brownback that I heard on the radio the other day saying that he wants to make welfare allowed for people who are married because he does not want families to be seperated for the economic reward that they currently get. Smart move I think. I'd rather give a person welfare who is married and why not? We give tax credits to people with children why not extend it to people who have spouses also for the sake of our society not just economically.

Answer 7

Things have been getting worse for the average citizen over the decades because of the world banks and corporations controlling our government.
This is a bi-phony-partisan effort.

The policies over the decades have been 100% for corporate government, and 100% against the average citizen.

Answer 8

i don't understand how all of us could have self belief something that the Bush administration tells them while it comprises national secure practices. watching previous pictures from earlier the conflict on Iraq began, they made it sound as though there grew to become into absolute info that Iraq had WMDs, a nuclear weapons application, and strong ties to al-Qaeda. It sounded as though Saddam might desire to for my area hand off a grimy bomb to Osama bin-encumbered, provide him a airplane fee ticket to united statesa. and tell him to "provide 'em hell". How the leaders in this administration have not been impeached for such blatant lies is previous me. definite, there are terrorists distant places. definite, there are people who dislike united statesa. (ordinarily for our aggressive distant places coverage). yet there are suggestions on a thank you to guard against those threats different than attempting to weigh down their host countries. Are we going to march one-by utilising-one throughout the time of the middle east, Africa, and the relax communist countries till there are actually not to any extent further any "threats" to our way of life? Empires have tried that form of worldwide domination earlier, and in spite of better protection tension power it is going to actual brought about their downfall. call it coddling the terrorists in case you opt for or sending our enemies into scientific care, yet while our in straight forward terms way of coping with threats is to objective to destroy them with tension, then we are doomed to continuously have extra enemies waiting interior the wings.

Answer 9

It would be easier to understand your rant if it at least had a single theme -- other than "bash liberals".

Yes, people commit crimes. Yes, it's bad.

Other than those obvious points, It's hard to understand what you are trying to ask (not that you are actually asking).

Answer 10

There you go my republican friend- substance and not generality. There may be hope for you yet.