QUESTION for the 'CLINICALLY INSANE' left WINGERS?

Question

You say George W. Bush is 'Corrupt' and has done 'ILLEGAL' things while President. This is LAUGHABLE! How do I know?

1. The Democrats who control Congress don't think so. If they did, they have the power to impeach or at least make Bush testify. They Won't. Please Explain?

2. We have a FREE press in this country. Please tell me what reputable NEWPAPER editorial board has made the case for IMPEACHMENT? There are NONE. Why?

Why don't IMPORTANT people take your BASELESS acustions seriously? Because you are FULL of HOT air?

(I have posted on my 360 blog why Bush is a GREAT man and you LIBS are outvoted there to.)

Greed is Good!

Birds Chirping - As usual LIBS have no answers. Just Air America Talking points based on wishes not facts.

corogryph - good answer as usual. However, it's one thing for the court to say "This is unconstitutional" and another to say "You blantently violated the law and should be impeached".

They have not said that. Why are none of the THOUSANDS of newspapers not agreeing with you? Every administration has court battles and fights over executive power. Are they all CORRUPT. Hardly think so.

Again, Congress is silent. This speaks volumes.....the rest is HOT AIR!

Answer 1

I'm praying that the left wing nuts would try to impeach Pres.Bush.this would pretty much guarantee a GOP win in 08.it would show how stupid and vindictive the dems are.all their rhetoric is based on lies!

Answer 2

Gonzales is the last fall guy standing in the way of impeachment. Any other AG would have resigned by now but he is there to do doing everything he can to shield the administration using any legal means but mostly stonewalling. He is obviously very dedicated to the BungleBush to go through this assault on what little if any integrity and character he might have. If and when Gonzales is taken down, impeachment of the BungleBush will begin. The Dems are actually taking one step at a time.

Because of this situation, it is still premature for the media to rouse the rabble for impeachment. Sadly, the U.S. is currently in a constitutional crisis where the best solution is impeachment. In addition, impeachment would be the quickest and most effective means of rapprochement. It would tell our potential former allies that the U.S. is not becoming a dogmatic Fundamentalist Christian bully forcing its beliefs on weaker nations.

Answer 3

And right here endeth the lesson in idiotic politics and politicians. i could --if i became in any way political, vote for a celebration that had all that is contributors on the comparable internet site. we don't look to have something like that so I cant stand any of them. Factions--left, acceptable, some distance left, some distance acceptable, stable grief, why cant we've only one celebration of folk all forging forward for the stable of this united states of america instead of back room boys and bargains and all the crap we post with? individually, i'm ill of listening to ''landslide swing to---'' just to pay attention days later a team of twits in that celebration are disaffected, breaking away, crossing the floor and so on. would not that is superb if all the pollies in one celebration placed shifting Australia forward mutually instead of slyly getting elected to further their own agendas? back, Im dreaming !

Answer 4

You do yourself a disservice using a pejorative ad homenim label. No one has a lock on being clinically insane Just thought I would point that out. Arrogance is childish.
But to your two items: We have 14 Democrats that tend to vote for Bush's bills and a number who don't. They don't act and vote in unison. There ARE Democrats who support impeachment and a number of careerists who don't.
Don't look to them for a consensus. We also have DINOs like Zell Miller and Lieberman.
2. Free Press? Hardly. If the press did its job it would have shown how the run up to Bush's war was filed with falsehoods, distortions and out right lies. - If the press did its job, Bush would NEVER has stolen his first presidential election. The press is only as liberal as the corporations that own it. The press in the United States
is a subservient cheer leader for Bush and Bush's war.
And do you go to a NEWSPAPER board editorial stands?
Why the board of directors ? I don't think we have any reputable newspapers here in the states. Not the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal or the Washington Times.

3. do you want to elaborate on WHICH important people you had in mind and WHAT baseless accusations you are referring to?


But lets start with impeachable crimes.
He can and should be removed for politicizing the department of Justice, assuming more power than is constitutionally allowed for the executive branch, showing total disregard for the constitution and no respect for the rule of law. Remember the lies leading up to Bush 's war ? Outing a CIA operative for political revenge? interfering with Libby's sentence. I would add to that stealing the 2000 election. But if your head is in the sand, how would you know?

Answer 5

So, the fact that the US Supreme Court has twice confirmed Bush has violated federal laws means nothing to you?
[EDIT] Original case holding in Hamdan linked below.

The fact that Bush has ADMITTED refusing to comply with Congress subpoenas (violation of 2 USC 192) means nothing to you?

The fact that Bush has ADMITTED conducting warrantless wiretaps (violation of 18 USC 2511) means nothing to you?

He has admitted these things, and still you deny it?
How can you possible claim that is a logical position?

The reason Bush hasn't been impeached is purely political. Democrats in Congress are too spineless to stand up for the Constitution, and because there is no possible way 2/3 of the Senate would vote to convict -- no matter how much factual evidence and testimony is given.

You deny the basic fact that our highest court has confirmed criminal violations, and you deny the basic fact that Bush has publicly admitted the actions -- if you won't accept that as reality, then nothing anyone says will ever change your mind.

Answer 6

1) They can impeach but not convict (that requires a 2/3 vote in the Senate), making the process a waste of time.

2) It would compromise any criminal charges that may be brought against Bush once he is out of office.

-----------------

preacher1 -


Get real, the serious threat to America (far more than liberals or a bunch of pissed-off Muslims) are those conservatives who want to re-write the US Constitution in an attempt to overturn America’s secular democratic republic so they can replace it with a theocratic-based fascist government based on the humanity– and America–hating doctrine of their sadistic Old Testament God.

There is not a single mention of God, Jesus, or Christianity anywhere in the US Constitution The issue was discussed and the Founding Fathers voted God out, intentionally. The democratic republic they created was the first 100% secular government in human history. The following was unanimously passed by the 1797 US Congress and signed into law by President John Adams:

•“As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion, …”

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/barbary/bar1796t.htm

However, beginning with this offering of a new Preamble for the Constitution in 1863 —

•“We, the People of the United States [recognizing the being and attributes of Almighty God, the Divine Authority of the Holy Scriptures, the law of God as the paramount rule, and Jesus, the Messiah, the Savior and Lord of all], in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and to our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

http://candst.tripod.com/chrsamnd.htm...

— Christian groups have made constant attempts to re-write and amend the Constitution to force their beliefs and lifestyle upon every American. They further insist upon teaching the folktales and mythological stories of the Old Testament in classrooms as legitimate science.

Even having a Congressional Chaplain is a violation of the ‘establishment’ language of the Constitution – but then, that is only the opinion of the men who wrote and signed the document.

James Madison (Father of the US Constitution) addressed the issue of Congressional Chaplains.

•“Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative."

•"The Constitution of the U. S. forbids everything like an establishment of a national religion. The law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship for the national representatives… Does not this involve the principle of a national establishment, applicable to a provision for a religious worship for the Constituent as well as of the representative Body, approved by the majority, and conducted by Ministers of religion paid by the entire nation?”

•“The establishment of the chaplainship to Congs is a palpable violation of equal rights, as well as of Constitutional principles: The tenets of the chaplains elected [by the majority shut the door of worship agst the members whose creeds & consciences forbid a participation in that of the majority. To say nothing of other sects, this is the case with that of Roman Catholics & Quakers who have always had members in one or both of the Legislative branches. Could a Catholic clergyman ever hope to be appointed a Chaplain! To say that his religious principles are obnoxious or that his sect is small, is to lift the evil at once and exhibit in its naked deformity the doctrine that religious truth is to be tested by numbers or that the major sects have a tight to govern the minor.”

http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/...

Answer 7

And the medical source for this 'clinically insane' diagnosis? Is it Michael Savage? I ask because I'm curious who Bush would nominate next as Surgeon General.

Answer 8

The left in its daily attacks and projection of fault to the right and to GWB who is with many falling of grace, Amnesty, Armenian genocide, Trying to deal with the left which is no deferent than the enemy we face of Islam. But the left is with them and we can not deal with the devil and they are a part of this plan. They on the left do not look in the mirror and see their lying teeth rooting away and the decay of the infected cancel that is with in them. Which we would and should call evil.

There are many names for this Narcissism, denial, and so on but the root cause is evil of itself. The degree with which it is no deferent than that of Hitler or Osama bin laden.

And when they are faced with the truth they attack and defect to profess that they are above it all that with which they have caused.

The left is pure evil. Quote from People of the lie by M. Scott Peck, MD
Evil and Sin " It is not the sins that per se that characterize evil people, rather it is the subtlety and persistence and consistency of their sins. This is because the central defect of evil is not the sin but the refusal to acknowledge it* taken from Jung as correctly ascribed evil to the failure to "meet the Shadow" ".

" If evil people cannot be defined by the illegality of their deeds or the magnitude of their sins, then how are we to define them? The answer is by the consistency of their sins. While usually subtle, their destructiveness is remarkably consistent. This is because those who have " crossed over the line" are characterized by their absolute refusal to tolerate the sense of their own sinfulness".

Ok note to the left you will not understand this but the people of the right will.

The left is pure evil and yes some on the right power is the root. And this is all the left cares about with the attacks and to empower our enemy.

Answer 9

I think modern day liberalism is a form of mental illness. We should do something to help the poor people. They don't know what they are doing.

Answer 10

I don't like Bush but I wish people on Air America would shut up with the impeachment non-sense, I really do. And its the same people when Iraq comes up say "we shouldn't have been there at all". They've lost touch with reality, its the group of liberals that have buried their head in the sand, just like the group of neo-cons that don't think Bush has done anything wrong, putting their heads in the sand.