I find it very interesting that Senator Vitter was exposed by the DC Madam less then 3 weeks after he spoke out against the amnesty bill and stated that giving amnesty to illegals would hurt the American worker. He stood up against big buisiness and stoop up FOR AMERICA! He refused to stand by Bush.
2007-08-12 10:17:08 · 8 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Very perceptive.
I cannot believe how dumb and brainwashed so many people are on yahoo answers. I mean just complete morons.
They believe ANYTHING that the mainstream media tells them.
For some reason currently you cannot go against Bush on any of his pet issues like Iraq and Amnesty for Illegal aliens.
Unbelievable. The Corporate media is for Corporations obviously and they spin it and people buy it at their own expense and they don't even realize it.
At least Senator Vitter didn't get Anthrax sent to him. Remember the senators that recieved the anthrax letters voted against the "Patriot" Act.
Valerie Plame anyone?
The people that say that this is unrelated are naive to say the least. Sad. Sad. Sad.
2007-08-13 16:05:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
maximum mavens agree that this invoice could shrink unlawful immigration via no extra advantageous than 18%. This invoice makes individuals pay plenty for little or no. additionally, the main up-tp-date figures with reference to the tax reward of unlawful extraterrestrial beings point out that the only helpful benefit is on the federal point. State and local governments are dropping badly with the extra advantageous financial burden being place on faculties and amenities. I sent emails to the idiots representing my state and district. regardless of the undeniable fact that, i think that writing your Senator or representative is like attempting to coach a pig to sing. It wastes it sluggish and it annoys the pig.
2016-10-02 04:43:03 · answer #2 · answered by gonzalescordova 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's how the as.sclowns in D.C play their games.
BTW----When is G.W Bush going to be impeached?
2007-08-14 04:40:46 · answer #3 · answered by Captain Tomak 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And why do you think Bush had anything to do with it? Why do you think Bush has everything to do with everything all of the time?! He's a republican, did you really think she'd start with a democratic?
2007-08-12 10:29:54 · answer #4 · answered by Brianne 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He wasn't tho only republican who opposed the bill.
Besides. If he hadn't put his "little friend" where is didn't belong in the first place, there wouldn't have been anything to expose.
2007-08-12 10:25:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
No. He paid the price for getting involved in prostitution. Immoral people have no credibility in moral issues.
2007-08-12 10:22:46 · answer #6 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Sorry, he was outed by Larry Flint who by the way has stated he will only out republicans.
2007-08-12 10:22:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
those two issues are totally irrelevant to each other...
you can block me now
2007-08-12 10:22:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋