Politics - 11 August 2007

So what if Rudy Giulani's daugher supports a democratic frontrunner. CNN actually made a story out of this, albeit brief. They said that Giulani's daughter listed herself as being an Obama supporter on facebook.

So what?

Giulani has already asked the press to respect his family's privacey.

So was it right to report this story?

2007-08-11 15:49:12 · 15 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

2007-08-11 15:47:47 · 8 answers · asked by Mike F 1

I mean think about it, you have Democrats and Republicans, not politcians I mean regular people, rabidly debating whether its true or not and whether we should do anything about it. But what people think lately seems to go down party line, which I think is sad because it means that special interests on both sides are dominating the debate, environmentalist groups give money to Democrats and oil companies give money to Republicans, both have different interests in the issue so their stance becomes the party's talking points and people just decide that that's what they believe without think for themselves. I think that's sad because it means they're winning, these corrupt greedy groups on both sides control the parties and the money and now the minds of the people. Why don't people just do their own research instead of reading biased opinions and come up with a consensus and a plan instead of bickering on behalf of special interests?

2007-08-11 15:46:17 · 24 answers · asked by secretservice 5

I recently started a new independent non-partisan web community think tank for non profit. I am curious as to peoples thoughts whether this will be a successful venture?

http://stackzilla.com/main/index.php

2007-08-11 15:46:10 · 7 answers · asked by Bryan D 1

For those of you who have been silenced or repressed by political correctness, what have you done about it? Did you stand up for yourself or remain silent?

2007-08-11 15:42:59 · 29 answers · asked by Maid Mesmera 3

I'm anti-abortion and anti-war, but I don't think it's hypocritical to oppose abortion and support the war on terror because abortion and war are two separate issues. Why try to reconcile them?

2007-08-11 15:06:32 · 13 answers · asked by Maid Mesmera 3

The arrogance of the anglo saxon race knows no limits......

2007-08-11 15:03:46 · 13 answers · asked by Blessed 1

are you ready to go off the cliff with them, like a bunch of lemmings? They're arguments are not supported by fact. They promote lies as the truth. Before you go off the cliff with them make them show you credible facts, because they can't. Then after you see them for what they are, we will welcome you into the republican party.

2007-08-11 15:01:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-11 14:51:08 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would you want to be convicted with the same kind of "proof" that you have against Bush on WMDs?

2007-08-11 14:47:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Can anyone cite me the raw intelligence that Bush said "left no doubt" that Iraq had WMD in 2003?

Or is the "left no doubt" just the lie that Bush added himself.

2007-08-11 14:46:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Iraq war is now a hard core right wing war (the 32% that still support it) & if it is lost they are the ones who are going to take the biggest fall & they know it & it will be to a bigger enemy than Al Qaeda. It will be the biggest lost conservatives have had to the libs since Roe v. Wade & they will do anything in their power to make sure that US troops don't leave Iraq until at least Bush has left office even though they know the best US troops can do in Iraq is stalemate.

Which to conservatives is certainly better than a loss to the libs, only US troops will continue to be killed for conservatives benefit. Is that what patriotism means these days? Cover you own a*s?

2007-08-11 14:45:13 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

from or to the Constitution what would it be?

2007-08-11 14:42:50 · 13 answers · asked by ♥ Mel 7

So far you've provided links that say our intel was wrong, but none that prove Bush lied.

2007-08-11 14:38:51 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-11 14:32:48 · 6 answers · asked by Scott B 7

a success or not?

-Is there a deadline date?

-Is there a certain number of terrorists/insurgents that have to be killed?

-Does the civil/sectarian war have to stopped?

-Does Iraq's borders have to secured?

-Does Baghdad have to be 100% secured?

-Do Iranian & Syrian supplies to the insurgents/terrorists have to stop?

What will determine the success or failure of Bush's Surge or is it really just giving Bush more time to cut & run from the White House in 2009 & not have to take the blame for losing the Iraq war?

2007-08-11 14:27:13 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The communist liberals in San Fransicko want to remove him from talk radio.

Not only is this bad news for Savage, this is bad news news for freedom of speech.

Whether you agree with Mike or not, you need to fight for him.

Because this is the future of freedom of speech we're talking about here.

So please, email the Mayor of San Fransicko now!!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

2007-08-11 14:25:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

examples of men of stature...

John F Kennedy
M L King
Malcolm X ...... just to name a few

2007-08-11 14:22:26 · 12 answers · asked by Blessed 1

2007-08-11 14:19:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is voting for obama in the next election?


and is there anyone voting for hilary?..cuz yea shes gonna screw us all..sorry option...

2007-08-11 14:04:11 · 13 answers · asked by Amanda : 5

Wow four questions all the same, makes you think...

Anyway, As is my understanding:

George Bush cheated his way into office.
Took long vacations.
Was about to go down as the worst president of all time but 9/11 saved him because the nation understandably needed a leader.
Stopped all flights excepted for the saudis who supposabably did it but because they've invested trillions in the american ecconemy if they were to pull out because one of the royal family was killed it would go t i t s up.
Took away some liberties to fight the war on terror (patriot act).
Took the country to an illegal war.
Lied about the WMDs.
Actually went there for oil.
Continued to tell lies about winning the war even though the solidiers are still fighting.
Somewhere along the line opened the gyntanimo bay prison where people are held without trial because they might be terrorists but probably aren't.

Am I right?

2007-08-11 14:01:33 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-11 14:01:32 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-11 13:46:37 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-11 13:41:18 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Iraqi people have ensured their oil will remain Iraqi.....

2007-08-11 13:36:24 · 15 answers · asked by Blessed 1

Leave your stupid ****** opinions out of it.

2007-08-11 13:29:26 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

what is meant by the context of political cartooons?

2007-08-11 13:20:33 · 6 answers · asked by rainbow fun 2

incumbents every election that way we insure they can't turn into leeches on our tax dollars?

2007-08-11 13:10:26 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Gays have to fight for certain rights primarily because of their lifestyle, sexuality, 'choice', "abhorant" behavior, etc.
but let us face it. because there are many amongst us who practice "abhorant" sexual behavior also ( the same type sex as is practiced by gays only between man and woman, bi-sexuals, those who engage in threesomes or foursomes, etc.) Yet no one is questioning their behavior.
And Congress wants to limit rights?
Lifestyle or not, at least gays are coming out of the closet.
Those practicing deviant behavior amongst so-called "straights" continue to get away with it with no restrictions on 'rights'.
Seems to be a double standard here.

2007-08-11 13:09:32 · 10 answers · asked by rare2findd 6

Isn't this another simple matter of supply and demand?

2007-08-11 13:04:46 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous