English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So far you've provided links that say our intel was wrong, but none that prove Bush lied.

2007-08-11 14:38:51 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Credible main stream media sources, not links from left of moveon.org sites.

2007-08-11 14:43:54 · update #1

22 answers

you are asking libs for facts. they know there is no proof he lied.

you really shouldn't tease the libs. it makes them cranky.

2007-08-11 14:43:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 8

There aren't any. In fact 500 artillery rounds of nerve gas were found in Bagdad last year. All the media had to say was, well they're old and probably unuseable. Did any of the libtards stop to think that if thery're old that means they've been there a long time? Of course not. It was all brushed aside.
All you've really got is proof of how the leftist propaganda has "morphed" over time.
First, it was, There's no proof of WMDs, Then it became There aren't any WMDs, Then it became Bush lied about WMDs, which is where they've been stuck now, Blindly repeating the same slogan like a broken record.
If the Army were to discover today, a cache of nerve weapons, you can bet the left would say they were planted there to make Bush look good.

2007-08-12 04:13:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

credible mainstream media...wow. I think that is going to be very hard nowadays.
The media is out of control on both sides. Question everything and always remember that books and articles are written from people. People have biases no matter what. It is very difficult to get an objective point of view from anyone.

2007-08-11 14:51:39 · answer #3 · answered by alana 5 · 4 0

This proves that he is a liar:
www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/03/31/bush_lies

Google: "Downing Street memo" which quotes British agents talking about their conversations with Bush and Cheney: "the intelligence and the facts are being fixed around the policy."

2007-08-11 16:11:21 · answer #4 · answered by marvinsussman@sbcglobal.net 6 · 1 1

Time for you to sit down. Your still have your butt underneath you because people that want you dead have been kept away. Do you think a president like the one we have today, who has already told the middle East that Western civilization has lost when he told them he would negotiate/talk with them? You did hear their response right? The West is a weak culture. So sit down before you embarrass yourself somemore.

2016-05-20 02:08:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Stay the Course. During an October 22, 2006 interview on ABC’s This Week, President Bush tried to distance himself from what has been his core strategy in Iraq for the last three years. George Stephanopoulos asked about James Baker’s plan to develop a strategy for Iraq that is “between ’stay the course’ and ‘cut and run.’”

Bush responded, ‘We’ve never been stay the course, George!’


President Bush, 10/18/06:

There’s certainly a stepped up level of violence, and we’re heading into an election. … They are trying to not only kill American troops, but they’re trying to foment sectarian violence. They [Al Qaeda] believe that if they can create enough chaos, the American people will grow sick and tired of the Iraqi effort and will cause government to withdraw.

STEPHANOPOULOS: And for the first time the President acknowledged parallels to Vietnam. It came when I asked for his response to ‘New York Times” columnist Tom Friedman’s contention that we’re now seeing an Iraqi version of the Vietcong’s 1968 Tet offensive that turned American public opinion decisively against the war.

BUSH: He could be right. There’s certainly a stepped up level of violence and we’re heading into an election.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So they’re trying to influence the elections?

BUSH: It could be. I don’t know. I haven’t - I don’t have any intelligence that says that.

TORTURE

We are finding terrorists and bringing them to justice. We are gathering information about where the terrorists may be hiding. We are trying to disrupt their plots and plans. Anything we do ... to that end in this effort, any activity we conduct, is within the law. We do not torture." - President Bush (Nov. 7, 2005).

The State Department's annual report on human rights practices worldwide has condemned countries such as Burma and North Korea for the disappearance and indefinite detention of political prisoners without trial; while also condemning Libya, Syria and other countries for engaging in acts of torture that include hooding, stripping detainees naked, sleep deprivation, subjecting detainees to extremes of heat, cold, noise and light, threatening them with dogs, submerging them in water to simulate drowning — which is known as water-boarding — and other acts of physical abuse all of which have occured at U.S. detention facilities. See State Dept. Study Cites Torture of Prisoners: Rumself Approved Similar Practices (Washington Post March 10, 2005).


By your own admission no evidence that you could be shown would overcome your preconception, you don't want evidence you want reassurance that you are right, and that is impossible,
"You can lead a fool to knowlege, but you can't make him think"

2007-08-11 14:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

You'll get those links about the same time you get someone to tell you what crime Bush should be impeached for.

In other words never. It's funny that most of these idiotic answers are links to file not found 404 pages. It's sad and you can see the truth is sinking in that the dems they all drooled over during the midterms have hosed em and won't be able to hold.

Go ahead and put your thumbs down over there. I hope it helps you get over your feeling of impotence. >>>>>>>>

2007-08-11 15:06:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

You are either as hard headed as our President or just a glutton for punishment.

Before I catalog the Bush administration’s “Techniques of Deceit,” let me acknowledge that no U.N. resolution requires the president to be honest with the American people. The fine print of Resolution 1441 imposes no obligation to treat Americans as citizens to be informed rather than suckers to be conned. He may mislead, distort, suppress, exaggerate and lie to his heart’s content without violating a single sentence in 1441.

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0302/S00061.htm

2007-08-11 14:55:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Read the book out by the former director of the CIA. He repeatedly told them the information he had (no credible evidence). Bush and Cheney ignored his info and said otherwise. He resigned.

2007-08-11 14:52:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

Jeff, I have to confess that I'm NOT a Bush person because he's not a conservative.

But looking at these responses makes me laugh, actually, I'm roaring. Not one person can cite a legitimate source, not one. And I'm reading that YOU'RE brain washed. LMAO!

Moveon.org and Soros are to be commended. Eh? LOL!

2007-08-11 14:52:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

I AGREE WITH ROMARE THIS MAKES ALOT OF SENCE WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IN DUDE YOU WILL NEVER GET ANY LINKS TO PROVE BUSH EVER LIED GOOD LUCK ON THAT ONE I TELL YOU WHAT IF YOU EVER GET ONE THEN HOLD YOUR BREATHE IN PASS OUT ARE BE DEAD FROM LACK OF AIR TO YOUR BRAIN IF YOU GOT ONE THEN SAY I CAN SEE THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL YOU WILL BE DEAD IN GONE LOL

2007-08-11 14:51:30 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers