Can you post a credible link that shows that Bush lied about WMDs?

Question

OK to many thats

None of the investigative bodies found that to be true that I know of. But if you have credible proof I'd like to see it.

cantcu - Why would Bush take the word of Saddams foriegn minister?

I'm still waiting - So far you've provided links that say we had incorrect intel but none that say he lied.

Answer 1

no because he didn't.

Answer 2

Intelligence leaves no doubt that Iraq continues to possess and conceal lethal weapons
(George Bush, US President 18 March, 2003)

Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.
(George Bush - Speech to UN General Assembly - September 12, 2002 )

"25,000 liters of anthrax ... 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin ... materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent ... upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents ... several mobile biological weapons labs ... thousands of Iraqi security personnel ... at work hiding documents and materials from the U.N. inspectors."
(George Bush - State of the Union Address - January 28, 2003 )

We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.
(George Bush - Radio Address - February 8, 2003 )

Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.
(George Bush - Address to the Nation - March 17, 2003 )

I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein -- because he had a weapons program.
(George Bush - Remarks to Reporters - May 6, 2003)

But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them.
(George W. Bush - Interview with TVP Poland - 5/30/2003)

You remember when [Secretary of State] Colin Powell stood up in front of the world, and he said Iraq has got laboratories, mobile labs to build biological weapons ...They're illegal. They're against the United Nations resolutions, and we've so far discovered two...And we'll find more weapons as time goes on And we'll find more weapons as time goes on
(George W. Bush - Press Briefing - 5/30/2003)

Answer 3

Try these.
http://www.hermes-press.com/wmd_gate.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/13/AR2006091302052_pf.html

Here's one from John Dean which includes the President's own words. http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20030606.html

If you need more you can watch PBS, they did an excellent show detailing how the administration lied. Remember the line, do you want a mushroom cloud to be the proof Saddam has WMD's?

Answer 4

Obama has destroyed the economic kit. NO BUSH did not destroy IT!!!!! It became damaging on a similar time as Obama surpassed off of paintings, yet wait, human beings, you ain't considered nothin yet! purely wait. In a rapid time you will see you electric power expenditures sky rocket and you will blame and demonize the ability companies. The groceries will bypass up and you will blame the save owners for being grasping. bear in mind on a similar time as he reported no new taxes? He meant none on human beings like me; the working unfavorable. the electric powered corporation is going to get hammered. wager who gets to pay it? Duh, not the electric powered corporation. What approximately wellness care? we've been broke earlier he proposed diverse trillion, TRILLION greenback utility and how will that gets a cost for? Do you think of of he's so generous he will take it out of his own account? Uh, no. he will tax the utilities. he will tax each and each and all the failings we'd desire to outlive and we are waiting to pay for it. we can. No new taxes, huh? large president!!!!!!!

Answer 5

Did you have enough guy! OR you want more?!
If i were you, i would hide now!

Bush with his witless secrecy and disasters have put Nixon in 2nd place! and will be laughed at for rest of his time!

Answer 6

He lied in the 2003 State of the Union address -- but claims it was just an "error"...........

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/07/09/iraq/main562312.shtml

Answer 7

Ex-CIA official: WMD evidence ignored
'60 Minutes' report: White House disregarded good intelligence

Sunday, April 23, 2006; Posted: 10:04 p.m. EDT (02:04 GMT)


(CNN) -- A retired CIA official has accused the Bush administration of ignoring intelligence indicating that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and no active nuclear program before the United States-led coalition invaded it, CBS News said Sunday.

Tyler Drumheller, the former highest-ranking CIA officer in Europe, told "60 Minutes" that the administration "chose to ignore" good intelligence, the network said in a posting on its Web site.

Drumheller said that, before the U.S.-led attack on Iraq in 2003, the White House "ignored crucial information" from Iraq's foreign minister, Naji Sabri, that indicated Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

Drumheller said that, when then-CIA Director George Tenet told President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other high-ranking officials that Sabri was providing information, his comments were met with excitement that proved short-lived.

"[The source] told us that there were no active weapons of mass destruction programs," Drumheller is quoted as saying. "The [White House] group that was dealing with preparation for the Iraq war came back and said they were no longer interested. And we said 'Well, what about the intel?' And they said 'Well, this isn't about intel anymore. This is about regime change.' "

"CBS said the White House declined to respond to the charge and that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has said Sabri was just one source and therefore not reliable.

But Drumheller said it was not unusual for the administration to rely on single-source stories when those stories confirmed what the White House wanted to hear.

He cited a report the CIA received in late 2001 that alleged Iraq had bought 500 tons of uranium-containing compounds from Africa.

"They certainly took information that came from single sources on the yellowcake story and on several other stories with no corroboration at all," he said.

Bush included the reference, which was attributed to the British and turned out to be false, in his 2003 State of the Union Address.

The CIA in 2002 had sent former ambassador Joseph Wilson to Niger to investigate the claims, and he went public in July 2003 criticizing the Bush administration's case for going to war in Iraq. The subsequent publication of his wife's identity as a CIA employee spawned an investigation that resulted in the indictment of Cheney's chief of staff and is still ongoing. (Full story)

"It just sticks in my craw every time I hear them say it's an intelligence failure," Drumheller told CBS' Ed Bradley. "This was a policy failure. I think, over time, people will look back on this and see this is going to be one of the great, I think, policy mistakes of all time."

Answer 8

Cant because he covered up goooooood , just like everything else.

Answer 9

Yes just listen ;)
http://www.trilulilu.ro/mitipiti/d44ac5e4b05460

Answer 10

Can you post a link proving any were ever found ?

:-(

Answer 11

There is none because he didn't "lie". He may or may not have been wrong but that has never been considered a lie until now.