Politics - 2 August 2007

Its pretty obvious when you ask a question that would require an answer that would reflect harshly on their party, and then its asked over and over again till it reflects and opposite response.

Do they find some thrill in this, or are they to lazy to question anything on their own?

2007-08-02 17:25:45 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does free speech require Tax exemption.

Where does it stop Can a Corporation lie to you and then claim The price of lying a deductable expence.

Are Americans screwed

2007-08-02 17:10:34 · 7 answers · asked by ? 2

NOW THE NEOCONS CALL HIM A LIBERAL!!

WHY WOULD THEY CALL ONE OF THEIR OWN THAT HAS THEIR OWN VALUES A "LIB"??

2007-08-02 17:00:20 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Realize that they're griping about it on a Yahoo!© server, using an Intel© powered computer, running a Microsoft© operating system, on a Comcast© connection, while sipping a drink made by Coca Cola©? Granted, some people might have to replace Microsoft© with Apple©, or various other changes, but the point is the same. Just what would your lives be like without all of these 'evil', greedy, corporations?

2007-08-02 16:59:46 · 18 answers · asked by Dekardkain 3

Is anybody else tired of it? or is it just me? With all do respect but She is always coming up with some dumb 9-11 conspiracy theories? Just wondering if she had a PHD in any of those, above?. I mean anybody can manipulate any evidence to show what they want to prove ie Michael Moore Films. Popular science and MIT have already debunked these ridiculas claims. Osama in the Boys are responsible for 9-11, Just like in 93 WTC, 96 KHOBAR TOWERS 19 AIRMAN DEAD 300 WOUNDED, 98 EMBASSY BOMBING AND 2000 U.S.S. COLE!!!! GET OVER IT,

2007-08-02 16:56:48 · 14 answers · asked by dez604 5

always actually act in our best interest?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070803/ap_on_re_us/marines_iraq_shooting

Therefore, is it really so wrong to investigate possible wrongdoing by those who are entrusted with the security and operation of this nation?

2007-08-02 16:43:45 · 6 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

2007-08-02 16:43:22 · 16 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

Did Mark Foley ask the Republicans to hold off on legislation until he left office?

2007-08-02 16:29:38 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

3660 Troops have now given their life's for this country and we have pissed away a 1/2 a trillion dollars in Iraq and our own bridges and roads are not even safe. Is it NOW time to concentrate on our own problems here in America and not worry about the middle east? Don't we have enough problems here to deal with? What is this administration thinking? Is there any logic to this all?

2007-08-02 16:15:28 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

There are a few choices that I can see.
1. Article 1 Section 2 where it says that the President is Commander in Chief. The Democrats in Congress have been trying to take the president's constitutional power away from him in their attempts to dictate troop movements.
2. The First Amendment, Senator Kerry and Durbin have both expressed interest in bringing back the "fairness doctrine" which is a direct violation of freedom of speech on the radio airwaves.
3. The Second Amendment, Democrats are always in favor of unreasonable gun control.
4. The Tenth Amendment, which says, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." In fairness to the Democrats almost everybody in the country hates this amendment. The Department of Education is unconstitutional according to this amendment.
5. The Twelth Amendment, the Electoral College.

2007-08-02 16:15:11 · 13 answers · asked by Matt M 2

Democrats, however, hailed the 83-14 Senate vote as proof they are fulfilling their 2006 campaign promise to crack down on lobbying abuses.

There is not 83 demorcrats in senate, and republicans in senate seem to also feel lobbying abuses go both ways.

United States Department of Justice in 1996 uncovered evidence prior to and during the Clinton administration and also involved the fund-raising practices sought to direct contributions from foreign sources to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before the 1996 presidential campaign.

Intelligence information had shown the PRC Embassy in Washington, D.C. was used for coordinating contributions to the DNC in violation of United States law forbidding non-American citizens or non-permanent residents from giving monetary donations to United States politicians.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/02/ap/congress/main3129055.shtml

.

2007-08-02 16:02:44 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 15:54:20 · 8 answers · asked by TRAF 4

If a US firm was to make a deal arming a nation like libya, you can bet the anti american far left libs would be screaming about how evil american greedy corporations are.

Well maybe I am wrong, after all, you far left libs might think that Libya is a better nation then the US. Are you hoping that the french and the libyans will bring down the evil US?

2007-08-02 15:53:47 · 10 answers · asked by cadisneygirl 7

http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/01/its-just-game-its-just-game.html

I followed this up only to find that this is real and these cards were published in 95. The gamer himself was under investigation by the secret service.
http://www.sjgames.com/SS/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jackson_Games,_Inc._v._United_States_Secret_Service

Can you explain it?

2007-08-02 15:45:34 · 10 answers · asked by Enigma 6

If so, what would it be name and what important issue would it tackle?

2007-08-02 15:37:02 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Will we finally get a government that listens to the people, and worries more about justice at home instead of Empire abroad?

2007-08-02 15:35:35 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 15:31:57 · 11 answers · asked by iPodlord 4

From yahoo news today:

By BURT HERMAN, Associated Press Writer
Thu Aug 2, 3:27 PM ET

"SEOUL, South Korea - South Korea's frustration over the plight of Christian volunteers seized by the Taliban is starting to focus on the United States, a frequent target of resentment here."

Why are they mad at us? I understand that they may be frustrated that they can't get their hostages home. I understand that our policies and their policies may not always be the same 100% of the time. I get that.

But they are frustrated with us??? How many of their people did we kidnap? Did we somehow help the terrorists find these South Koreans and drive the getaway car?? If you want to be angry and frustrated, please focus that energy on where it belongs: the people who actually kidnapped your countrymen.

2007-08-02 15:30:42 · 9 answers · asked by Pythagoras 7

Would you rather go to church or get laid? Even if you're a hard core Jesus freak that has to be a toughie....so why are these politicians yankin' us about their 'faith'?

2007-08-02 15:29:08 · 7 answers · asked by Noah H 7

I think the status they have right now suites them just fine. They're defeated; a minority; and they thrive on AM talk radio. Seems to be their natural place in society.

2007-08-02 15:26:56 · 20 answers · asked by Remember the GOP? 2

2007-08-02 15:26:53 · 23 answers · asked by Page 4

I think this is one of the biggest problems America faces today. There is only change after something collapses, gets blown up, or shot up. I think this is pretty naive thinking on my part but this can be tied to any subject from 9/11 or the current immigration problem. Does American policy only change at the last possible second?

Do you believe we can continue like this?
Do you believe this is a liberal/conservative viewpoint?

2007-08-02 15:25:06 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 15:24:49 · 17 answers · asked by MrNeutral 6

should I get some type of discount..they had the little ones and it should be thier respondabilites and not mine...I should get to kick the father of the kids in the groin once a year...

2007-08-02 15:23:49 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm sure these people think they are "firing up the base" but they are actually just turning people into democrats one by one.

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

"I'll just wish that John Edwards would get killed in a terrorist attack..."
"I was going to talk about John Edwards but I hear they send you to rehab for using the word "fa**ott"
- both quotes from Ann Coulter

"Thank God for 9/11 and the Virginia Tech Massacre. He is gracious in giving America punishment for sponsoring f@ggotry..."
"I fully support [Bush's nomination of] James Holsinger to the position of Surgeon General... there is no more qualified person."
- both quotes from Fred Phelps

2007-08-02 15:23:32 · 12 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6

Any takers?

2007-08-02 15:21:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have seen several plans proposed by Congress, but have yet to see the cut-and run plans that people keep talking about?
can someone give me an example of plan that calls for immediate removal of US troops? Thanks.

2007-08-02 15:15:40 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 15:09:41 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-02 15:08:36 · 26 answers · asked by MrNeutral 6

2007-08-02 14:59:10 · 15 answers · asked by Soylent 4