Politics - 25 July 2007

What the prime-minister of the UK who takes his place?

ASSUMING that it is an emergency not in normal circumstances...

2007-07-25 04:37:12 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 04:35:35 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

and see for themselves whether or not it says to behead the unbelievers?

Don't take my word for it, don't argue about context (as if there were a context in which beheading would be appropriate), don't try to call other people stupid for not "interpreting" X to mean Y - - - buy yourself a Koran and see for yourself what it says.

Don't take my word for it - take Muhammad's word.

2007-07-25 04:33:16 · 3 answers · asked by truthisback 3

having Baby-Boomer alcoholic parents that have learned that
whining gets them everything they ever desire??

Let's face it..narcissistic drunk fathers with passive-resistant
wives produce conflicted offspring..

2007-07-25 04:31:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Top three in order , please .

2007-07-25 04:31:29 · 5 answers · asked by jsjmlj 5

hate to break it to you, but if you get your opinons from a talking head on the radio or television, you are an imbecile, this goes for liberals out there too. It just seems more prevalent with the consevative side of the aisle.

2007-07-25 04:25:58 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 04:24:35 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 04:14:44 · 35 answers · asked by Page 4

Someone just posted an answer to a question that said:

"George W. Bush restored Honor and Dignity to it" - the White House

Could anyone please explain to me how? I mean, referring to our constitution as “just a piece of paper”, breaking laws, hiding the truth about why/how we went to war in Iraq and exclaiming “mission accomplished” prematurely, just don’t seem to me as “Honorable”, or “Dignified” to me.

2007-07-25 04:11:53 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why can they have nuclear weapons?

2007-07-25 04:10:24 · 15 answers · asked by Page 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePb6H-j51xE

PLEASE watch this short video and tell me what you think.

Liberals talking about Iraq and WMDs. They are ALL against Saddam and Iraq, and they believe Iraq has WMDs and is a major threat to our safety.

2007-07-25 04:04:57 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 04:04:41 · 8 answers · asked by Page 4

History and experience have proven that Zionist Jews will always support the Israeli/Jewish agenda over American interests. What was the most destructive spy operation ever? The thieft of America's atomic secrets. Why was responsible? A Jewish Spy Ring led by the Rosenbergs--Zionist Jews. The second most destructive espionage against America was the Jonathan Pollard case. Pollard worked for Israel and stole America's vital intercontinenetal ballistic missile secrets and gave them to Israel. Israel in turn sold the secrets to Red China.

2007-07-25 04:03:40 · 10 answers · asked by jeremiahjjjjohnson 2

Or how about when they call bush a chimp. Is it refreshing to hear them say these new words and phrases everyday?

2007-07-25 04:00:52 · 18 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3

He totally slammed the liberals! Especially when he was talking about how liberals say we created all the terrorists in Iraq? But we weren't in Iraq during these terrorists attacked now were we?
* The 1993 World Trade Center bombing that killed 6 and injured 1,000
* The 1993 Mogadishu firefight that killed 18 U.S. soldiers
* The 1995 Oklahoma City terrorist attack on the federal building by American extremists that killed 168, wounding several hundred others
* The 1995 Saudi Arabia car bomb that killed 5 U.S. military personnel
* The 1996 Khobal Towers bombing that killed 19 U.S. soldiers, wounding 515
* The 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 231 citizens, 12 Americans and injured 5,000
*
The 2000 USS Cole attack in Yemen that killed 17 U.S. sailors, wounding 39

2007-07-25 03:58:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

The latest craze in the environmentalist movement? The tangerine growers just switched their vote.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0707/No_tangerines_for_you.html

2007-07-25 03:55:53 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Take this liberals! Documented Video proof that hillery is not a christian! Just follow this link and want starting at 5:17...
oh and stop at 5:18 so you're not polluted by here non-christian thoughts.

2007-07-25 03:48:28 · 19 answers · asked by Chuckles 4

The Taliban are killing hostages. Al Qaeda is supposedly very strong, planning a major attack, and has sleeper cells in the US. Osama Bin Laden is wanted.

So when does the War on Terror start because I for one really want justice for the people responsible for 9/11.

2007-07-25 03:46:41 · 12 answers · asked by Take it from Toby 7

The most succesful species ever are ants and bees. They do not have leaders. They decide through a majority. Power always corrupts and total power (Bush) corrupts total. Just because we had for a long time life feudal system and now 4 year feudal system and are used to it, dosn't make it good. Your thoughts?

2007-07-25 03:40:02 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 03:31:38 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous

work, buy and sell?

2007-07-25 03:29:07 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

This asker seems to think so...I wonder what she does for a living?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070725070011AA9Yul6&r=w#MYxvIDLrBDB7dC_9CRwk

2007-07-25 03:28:11 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think this has any to do with the actions of Russia ? Do any of you feel as I ? Pull out all of OUR troops now and fast and tell them your on your own you ungrateful S O Bs! I know most of you well say no but I live with them you have no idea how much they envy and dis like us

2007-07-25 03:24:27 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 03:19:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I mean really, if you can't comprehend that, then what DO you comprehend?
All this con/lib stuff is smoke and mirrors people. I know you've been told different your whole life, and it's hard to think otherwise (being brainwashed this entire time). If you could think for yourself and do some comparative reading and research as a human not as an "American" you could wake up too! Turn off your TV and you'll have a chance.
Now respond with hate for trying to wake you up. Hopefully one of you (just one) got a split second of clarity.

2007-07-25 03:17:53 · 23 answers · asked by chadman 2

Here's the thing.

I say Jefferson believed in progressive taxation, taxing only the rich if possible, and using that money to educate citizens and build public works like canals. I then provide Jefferson statements to prove that is so.

Cons say social spending increasing poverty. I provide poverty rates from the Census proving the biggest drop in poverty rate came during the liberals 60s and during the Clinton years. Poverty stayed the same under Reagan and has increased under Bush.

Cons say supply side (trickle down law of the jungle) economics is superior to keynesian (invest in the American people) economics. I provide percent increase in real GDP, inflation adjusted median income, etc (from the Census, Bureau of Economic Analyse, etc) proving FDR, JFK, LBJ, and Clinton leave Reagan and Bush Jr in the dust.

CONS LOOK AT ALL THESE AND GIVE ME A THUMBS DOWN. ISN'T THIS PROOF THAT CONS CAN'T DEAL WITH REALITY? HOW CAN YOU GIVE A THUMBS DOWN TO FACTS?

2007-07-25 03:14:13 · 10 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3

Instead of living off entilements for their whole lives and having way more children than they can afford who eventually go on to be generational welfare recipients themselves...

2007-07-25 03:00:11 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

With each generation we become more liberal as a society and with each generation we become more decadant as a society. Is there a connection between the two?
Try not to answer just yes or no but give details in your answer.

2007-07-25 02:51:42 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do Dems believe in hurting poor families and wasting your hard earned taxes? It sure seems that way.

The Dems in Congress are trying to stop the state of Illinois from saving $1 Billion, which they will give to poor kids and moms who are on welfare. Why????

The Dems in DC are trying to stop the state from saving $1 Billion by improving its computer systems and outsourcing AFSCME union jobs.

Already the state has discovered and stopped 1,000 checks that go to illegal claims in just one county.

So the Dems would rather hurt poor people and waste your hard earned money in order to support unions. Sound very sad?


Thank God that President Bush might veto this waste.

2007-07-25 02:43:56 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

They want FREE LOVE, LEGAL DRUGS, and NO personal responsibility...

When you have a society that does not follow laws and is totally ME oriented...it causes chaos.

2007-07-25 02:41:25 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous