Politics - 25 July 2007

2007-07-25 17:00:08 · 26 answers · asked by razorblade romance 4

i hate u alot so answer as if ur life is nothing more than a twinkle in the sky...

2007-07-25 16:59:03 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 16:58:55 · 5 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

Bush did the same thing? That has always bothered me.

2007-07-25 16:57:47 · 7 answers · asked by Ethan M 5

2007-07-25 16:56:08 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 16:47:57 · 7 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

2007-07-25 16:45:16 · 7 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

If you had to choose between Bush Jr. or Hugo Chavez which would you prefer?

2007-07-25 16:43:42 · 11 answers · asked by netjr 6

If you had historical data proving supply side Republicans saw better growth then all other presidents, wouldn't you use it as proof that your ideas work best?

So why the copout when the facts show the opposite?

Keynesian (invest in America) Democrats see better growth then supply side Republicans.

IF REALITY WERE ON YOUR SIDE, WOULD YOU NOT USE IT?

1) Here are the percent increase in real GDP for various presidents:

FDR 177.51% (from 32' to 45')
FDR 88.14% (from 32' to 41', without WWII)
JFK/LBJ 46.00%
CLINTON 33.81%
REAGAN 30.63%
BUSH JR 16.55% (from 00' to 06')

http://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdplev.xls

---------

2) Here is the percent increase in inflation adjusted tax revenues:

FDR 447.54% (40' to 44', only data available)
CLINTON 57.91%
JFK/LBJ 37.63%
REAGAN 20.16%
BUSH JR 4.44% (assuming predictions up to 2008 hold)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/sheets/hist01z3.xls

2007-07-25 16:40:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.foxnews.com/hannityandcolmes/index.html

2007-07-25 16:38:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've heard them ALL before. Sore losers can't accept reality and therefore resort to all sorts of EXCUSES to explain why their theories were wrong.

1) Correlation does not imply causation unless of course you are talking about tax cuts and growth, then it is cause and effect.

2) It takes 2, 4, and even up to 8 years for a president's policies to take effect. That is why Reagan was responsible for the Clinton expansion (but not responsible for the Bush Sr recession). Of course this only applies selectively. If you're talking about Reagan and Bush Jr, then their policies had immediate effects and Carter and Clinton had nothing to do with it.

3) The Republican congress was responsible for the Clinton expansion but the Democratic congress during Reagan had absolutely nothing to do with the Reagan growth.

4) Government action has absolutely no effect on government policies. FDR, JFK, LBJ, and Clinton were just plain lucky.

2007-07-25 16:32:06 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 16:27:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 16:19:21 · 16 answers · asked by Enigma 6

2007-07-25 16:16:33 · 13 answers · asked by Enigma 6

2007-07-25 16:13:40 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

"disappeared", would you fight for their rights?

Serious question! No snarky remarks, PLEASE!

2007-07-25 16:11:41 · 29 answers · asked by Joey's Back 6

2007-07-25 16:09:21 · 3 answers · asked by Jenny 3

This guy is just a pure turd.

2007-07-25 16:00:41 · 2 answers · asked by TOP CONTRIBUTOR - FEMALE ORGASMS 1

2007-07-25 16:00:40 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070725194037AAvO1JP&r=w

Not one supporter of Bush condemned Gonzales' apparent perjury... they all brought up Clinton.

Is this what our country is coming to? "My party doesn't have to have any integrity because yours doesn't"?

Are you people KIDDING?

2007-07-25 15:57:57 · 5 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

I'm to going to go with Juliani.
NEVER HILARY!

2007-07-25 15:57:16 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 15:47:17 · 18 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

2007-07-25 15:39:34 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous

And yes all that written above is part of the Public Record and includes American citizens , see link straight from the White House -

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html

Question - What are your thoughts on this ?

2007-07-25 15:35:07 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

No other commentary please.

2007-07-25 15:24:45 · 17 answers · asked by Cherie 6

2007-07-25 15:21:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

What will the GOP nominee for president have to be or stand for to get you to vote again? This question is only for those who have voted Republican but did not in 2006.

2007-07-25 15:20:48 · 8 answers · asked by Chainsaw 6

2007-07-25 15:17:13 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-25 15:00:57 · 13 answers · asked by ? 2

I'm a conservative who would actually vote for either one of them? Did I just say that? Does that actually make me a conservative?

2007-07-25 14:38:14 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous