Someone just posted an answer to a question that said:
"George W. Bush restored Honor and Dignity to it" - the White House
Could anyone please explain to me how? I mean, referring to our constitution as “just a piece of paper”, breaking laws, hiding the truth about why/how we went to war in Iraq and exclaiming “mission accomplished” prematurely, just don’t seem to me as “Honorable”, or “Dignified” to me.
2007-07-25 04:11:53 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Thats like say Osama brought dignity to Islam.
2007-07-25 04:17:54 · answer #1 · answered by 2012 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Impeachment of Bush and Cheney is the only course of action for Democrats. Voters have a short memory. The impeachment will start in Aug. or Sept, of 2008, the goal for Democrats will be to have every American glued to the TV before the Nov. Elections. The Republicans pulled the same sham. They knew before the investigations of Clinton that they did not have the votes in the Senate to convict.. That never stopped them. Did it?
The investigations of Bush and Cheney will be greater than Nixon and Clinton added. Good for free TV coverage. It makes no difference if the Senate will not convict, it's about showing the voters the truth.
2007-07-25 04:22:08 · answer #2 · answered by jack09 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He brings honor by NOT breaking any laws. Nothing was hidden about going to war (Remember your democratic congres had just as much chance to see the information as he did) The dems voted also to go to war. The mission was accomplished when Sadam was no longer in power. It is in clean up mode now. He has brought God back into our country and pride in the flag. He instills patriotism in all. He had developed our ecomomy to withstand many more years of hardship, and has taken a hugh chunck out of the debt.
2007-07-25 04:19:27 · answer #3 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton was made fun of in the press and on TV. Bush 1 was made fun of. Reagan was made fun of. Jimmy Carter was a laughing stock and the butt of all jokes. Carter had very low approval numbers at the end as well and was considered a joke in the rest of the world. SO what is your point?
2016-05-18 00:39:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he took out sadaam who was researching all types of wmds, buying uranium from africa, refurbishing missiles, and getting the spetnaz to hide all evidence in syria
he put laws into order that keeps terrorists from attacking us......so your phone gets tapped, WHO GIVES A FLYING-****??? IF YOURE NOOT A TERRORIST WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO FEAR??
Yeah, he restored honor and dignity since Bill Clinton was a two-term failure.
he never lied about iraq
he never said mission accomplished, if you werent sucking michael moore, then you would know he specifically said
"America sent you on a mission to remove a grave threat and to liberate an oppressed people, and that mission has been accomplished"
2007-07-25 04:20:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess it all depends on what kind of president you want running the country. Do you want a president that is going to put America first, do what he feels he was elected to do, and take offense when people question his authority? Or do you want a president that the rest of the world likes, that cheats on his wife in the oval office, and who's foreign policy ignored international terrorism?
Personally I think it's the obligation of the president to put America first. And when countries like France, Russia, and most of the liberals in Washington are in an uproar over what our country does to protect it's interests, I have to believe we're on the right track!
2007-07-25 04:18:45 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think it implies to Bill Clinton and Monica incident; republicans are so proud of "their" president because he “restored” moral and honor of the White House. In a reality he is probably more capable to hide his $hit much better than Clintons…
2007-07-25 04:32:22 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. Beef Stroganoff 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
To the repressed religious right, 'restoring honor and dignity' means never having sex. Bush has succeeded by that definition.
2007-07-25 04:15:24 · answer #8 · answered by Joe D 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
That was the slogan he used in the 2000 election to differentiate himself from Clinton. Now we all know that he was far less dignified than Clinton ever was.
2007-07-25 04:21:52 · answer #9 · answered by Baysoc23 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
dignified like tickling the German Prime minister? Or his poor appreciation for how to dress around the queen?
Honor is harder to define but I feel confident hes done nothing honorable.
2007-07-25 04:24:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋