Politics - 23 June 2007

Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

Nancy Pelosi > October 10, 2002
"Yes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons."

2007-06-23 16:52:25 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-23 16:38:04 · 4 answers · asked by fdsfg f 1

After almost seven years of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s denial of receiving and failing to report $2 million in campaign contributions, a recently released “smoking gun” videotape reveals that Senator Clinton not only had direct knowledge of Mr. Peter Paul’s planning and funding of her 2000 Senate campaign, she and her White House staff liaison with her senate campaign acted as co-producers and talent coordinators of the largest fundraiser of her campaign.

Election law expert and US Supreme Court/Constitutional Lawyer John Armor determined on June 14, 2007, after analyzing the video of Hillary Clinton on a conference call with Peter Paul, Stan Lee, that the video captures Hillary engaged in at least four or five felony violations of the law.

Watch the video
http://www.therant.us/guest/k_miller/06232007.htm

2007-06-23 16:26:42 · 10 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

We didn't draft the soldiers that are fighting. They were patriotic and volunteered to fight to defend Americans. Are we going to defeat Al-Qeuda or simply rely on flight security to defend America?

Please don't reply saying troops are being killed or it's giving Americaa bad name, our any else of your liberal mumblings that are media made.

2007-06-23 16:11:00 · 19 answers · asked by austinblnd 4

2007-06-23 16:09:05 · 13 answers · asked by ibid 3

2007-06-23 16:06:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Now, some Republicans are calling Bush a liberal. They're starting to blur the definition of what a "red state" is...now, it's red counties, blue counties. They're starting to separate the "fiscal conservatives", "social conservatives" and "militaristic" arms of the Republican party. What exactly is the definition of conservative these days?

2007-06-23 15:53:56 · 14 answers · asked by Gemini 5

Straight news programs will report the news as it comes regardless if it makes Democrats or Republicans look bad. They did it against Clinton, Gray Davis, Gary Condit, and Howard Dean (for the scream). The individual reporters may have biases, but they try their best to remain objective.

The opinion media, on the other hand, picks a side and demonizes the other. They throw objectivity off the table and project their biases for all their worth. They look for stories that make the other side look bad and defend their side regardless of what they're caught doing. For example, Oreilly defending Rush Limbaugh's addiction.

That's what Fox News is mostly: OPINION MEDIA.

If you look at their line up it is mostly one right-wing pundit show ("news analyses show") after another.

2007-06-23 15:53:07 · 17 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3

This is not saying however, that I believe Dems are warmongers because there was a need to go to war in these cases, as there is today.

Wilson-WWI (ran for election on peace platform)
FDR-WWII (ran on platform to seek neutrality legislation)
Truman-Korea, not to mention dropping the 2 atomic bombs
JFK-first to commit ground troops to Vietnam
Clinton-"peacekeeping" missions in Somalia and Kosovo

Strange how they come up with these arguments, ain't it?

2007-06-23 15:49:48 · 22 answers · asked by suzyq 3

Does it ultimately come down to jealousy/envy?

2007-06-23 15:43:43 · 15 answers · asked by ☆Bombastic☆ 5

says as truth? They believe Rosie when she says "Fire cannot melt steel". They believe Bush is an incompetent fool but yet believe he was the mastermind behind 9/11.

2007-06-23 15:38:15 · 31 answers · asked by wallyshields 2

Cons are always squawking about how protesting the war gives the enemy super powers. Doesn't the fact that most people are against this war give America a better image and make just BUSH responsible?

2007-06-23 15:37:20 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

And Rush Limbaugh etc. They are scared of anything that sounds logical.

2007-06-23 15:31:33 · 17 answers · asked by wallyshields 2

Liberals, jews, pretty much the same thing.

Over 90% of jews in congress are Democrats or side with Democrats.
http://www.jewishreview.org/Archives/Article.php?Article=2004-11-15-457

87% of jews in America voted for Democrats in the last election
http://www.israelnetdaily.com/redir.php?headline=95161

Doesn't it make you sick cons share this same belief as neo-nazis?
============================

HERE ARE SOME NEO-NAZI QUOTES ON THE SO CALLED "LIBERAL/JEWISH MEDIA"


"They all understand, of course, that their Jewish bosses expect a certain slant on the reporting they do. They understand which side their bread is buttered on. They don't want to bite the hand that feeds them. But their liberal bias goes beyond just trying to please the Jewish media bosses who employ them."
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs974d.html

2007-06-23 15:25:07 · 13 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3

so outspoken against it?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070623/ap_on_go_co/immigration_talk_radio;_ylt=AjuvrglaK8ltg8bau3iVEfph24cA

Talk shows influence immigration debate

Some top Republicans who support the legislation have defied the broadcast pundits.

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., told reporters last week, "Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem."

Trent is still a repub isn't he?

2007-06-23 15:24:34 · 14 answers · asked by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4

Clinton left office with polls revealing that most questioned his morals and ethics; however, he also retained a 65% approval rating, the highest end-of-presidency rating among all the Presidents that came into office after World War II.

2007-06-23 15:15:28 · 17 answers · asked by Liberal City 6

When Rush Limbaugh has more listeners than NPR, or Tom Clancy sells more books than Noam Chomsky, or Motor Trend gets more subscribers than Mother Jones, liberals want to convince us (or themselves, perhaps) that it’s all because of some catastrophic market failure or a grand corporate conspiracy to dumb down the masses.

In reality, it’s just the result of consumer choice.

All the opinions that the Left’s media critics favor are now readily available to us via multiple platforms.

But that’s not good enough, it seems: they won’t rest until all of us are watching, reading, and listening to the content that they prefer.



http://michellemalkin.com/2007/04/15/fairness-doctrine-watch/

2007-06-23 15:10:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please click link below:

http://www.redpills.org/?p=97

Isn't READING something that you are voting on the only way to know what your decision is?

Why are we paying these people????

2007-06-23 15:01:49 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

And checking what books they take out from the library.

Don't they claim to want government out of their lives?

2007-06-23 14:54:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush vows permanent ban on future illegal migrants
President George W. Bush promised Saturday to permanently bar future illegal immigrants from the United States as he renewed his push for immigration reform, a centerpiece of his domestic agenda.
"Under this bill, those caught crossing illegally will be permanently barred from returning to the United States on a work or tourist visa," the president stated.

He went on to assure Americans the new bill puts border enforcement first.

How does Bush think he will accomplish that when they cannot be stopped now?

2007-06-23 14:53:22 · 15 answers · asked by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4

And return it to it's original wording.

2007-06-23 14:47:25 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-23 14:45:02 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

First of all, you can judge a countries greatness by the amount of people trying to get in equated to those trying to leave.
second, there are 2 people that would die for your rights, Jesus Christ and the American GI.
Why is he a better patriot that most American democrat poloticians?

2007-06-23 14:41:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

How can one be libertarian/anarchist and socialist/communist at the same time. A sole facet of libertarianism is a free-market economy.

2007-06-23 14:01:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Decatur church turns to Satan
Remember several years ago when God started advertising on billboards around the country?


"We need to talk. -- God."


"Need directions? -- God."


"Keep using my name in vain, I'll make rush hour longer. -- God."


A church in Decatur is now using the dark side to spread its message.


A billboard that reads "I Hate Victory Family Church -- Satan" went up near the intersection of U.S. 287 and U.S. 380 this week.

Check the pic out on the link? How long before someone claims it is offensive?

No, I am not a Satanist either. Just curious if Freedom of Religion will let these bill-boards stand without some one saying they are offensive.

2007-06-23 13:57:02 · 12 answers · asked by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4

When most of the abortions occur in non-traditional, broken families and among the poor in society? These people would have grown up and voted Democrat.

Are they destroying their future base?

2007-06-23 13:41:11 · 16 answers · asked by Sleeck 3

Why aren't women and doctors who perform abortions being prosecuted for murder?

2007-06-23 13:31:25 · 29 answers · asked by Liberal City 6

i got called a dumb f*** for saying that i didnt like him but why do u dislike him?

2007-06-23 13:26:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Taken from the EPA's website:

"Scientists are certain that human activities are changing the composition of the atmosphere, and that increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases will change the planet's climate..."

HERE IS THE KICKER:
"...But they are not sure by how much it will change, at what rate it will change, or what the exact effects will be."

http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basicinfo.html

Don't you think we should know those things before we start fearmongering?

Liberals seem so eager to start forcing legislation on Americans this instant to stop a "problem" of which we have no idea of what the effects will be.

And they smear and attack anyone who wants to wait for actual, accurate EVIDENCE and DATA before they blindly swear allegiance to Al Gore.

What is so wrong with wanting to have scientific PROOF?

2007-06-23 13:18:27 · 26 answers · asked by Sleeck 3

Yesterday a lib posted a question calling me out and claiming I had blocked her. In fact I had not. She realized she had made a mistake about 10 minutes later and posted a retraction and an apology which I accepted. HOWEVERT, IN THE TEN MINUTES BEFORE SHE POSTED HER APOLOGY ABOUT 30 LIBS SWOOPED DOWN LIKE BUZZARDS FEASTING ON A CARCAS. THREE OF THEM LIED BY SAYING I HAD BLOCKED THEM ALSO. MOST OF THE REST JUST USED THE OCCASSION TO VILIFY ME.
NOW, WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT THE VERACITY OF LIBS ON THIS SITE???

2007-06-23 13:05:03 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous