After almost seven years of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s denial of receiving and failing to report $2 million in campaign contributions, a recently released “smoking gun” videotape reveals that Senator Clinton not only had direct knowledge of Mr. Peter Paul’s planning and funding of her 2000 Senate campaign, she and her White House staff liaison with her senate campaign acted as co-producers and talent coordinators of the largest fundraiser of her campaign.
Election law expert and US Supreme Court/Constitutional Lawyer John Armor determined on June 14, 2007, after analyzing the video of Hillary Clinton on a conference call with Peter Paul, Stan Lee, that the video captures Hillary engaged in at least four or five felony violations of the law.
Watch the video
http://www.therant.us/guest/k_miller/06232007.htm
2007-06-23 16:26:42 · 10 answers · asked by rmagedon 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
this is how the brainwashed respond
"She made a felony phone call?? Ordering a murder? Your sources are corrupt, your information dubious at best."
No, the sources are factual, and she committed at least five felonies. Now the question is, do you want your politicians to be able to commit felonies without fear of punishment? Obviously the brainwashed do.
2007-06-24 00:37:21 · update #1
jimmy - even if it is illegally obtained, does that mean you support her criminal activities? that you will vote for her anyway?
2007-06-24 00:40:18 · update #2
Hillary Clinton has the backing of some of the richest people in the United States and probably else where in Communist regions of the world.
She can do whatever she pleases and get away with it and she knows it.
Or else her and her rapist husband would already have been imprisoned for the numerous crimes they committed including war crimes and crimes against humanity in the middle east against the Christians.
She is so corrupt I don't think she even knows how to fake being sincere anymore.
And her trying to act like a Christian to get our votes is a joke it's about as funny as her putting on a black southern drawl to gain the black votes when she runs for president in 08.
Absolutely ridiculous.
2007-06-23 17:06:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
They'll probably never show it, but it's true. I hope she finally get convicted of some of her crimes. She has always managed to get out of things before. It's time she was brought to justice.
I love this part of the text:
" Colette Wilson of the U.S. Justice Foundation filed an appellate brief today, in the civil lawsuit alleging Clinton's violation of a federal code that carries a possible five-year prison sentence. Wilson argues in the brief filed with the California Court of Appeal that Sen. Clinton's actions violated not only the $2,000 limit but Title 2 section 437 of the U.S. federal code, which states: "Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any provision of this act which involves the making, receiving, or reporting of any contribution, donation, or expenditure aggregating $25,000 or more during a calendar year shall be fined under Title 18, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both."
2007-06-23 17:03:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Aside from allegience of many in the MSM Hillary will buy or extort the rest of their silence. Unfortunately, (and it pains me to say) both Hillary and Bill are brilliant lawyers and politicians. They have been able to out maneuver all attempts to convict them for the felons they really are. I wish Starr had had the guts to pursue the real crimes of Clinton--but catching him on a technicality probably seemed more prudent that wasting millions more while the Clintons used stall tactics to 'get their facts' in order. I assume Starr was expecting removal from office for comitting perjury--he underestimated the Clintons.
2007-06-24 03:13:38 · answer #3 · answered by Cherie 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This will be spun into just another rant of the vast right wing conspiracy. The woman is not touchable; I mean she can turn a $2k investment into a $100,000 right. This is the woman who can't find a file for 18 months and then it shows up with her finger prints on it. But hey...she stands by her man.
2007-06-23 18:45:45 · answer #4 · answered by netjr 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, I don't believe anything will come of that, Hilary has her hands in many pots, but never gets burned.
Also, I find her new u-tube video true to her character, she is nothing but a mobster.
2007-06-24 06:33:58 · answer #5 · answered by Miss Kitty 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is above the law and there are bodies to prove that, msn will never show it
2007-06-23 22:39:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
ahh dont you love the clinton family more illeagle activitys than the sopranos
2007-06-23 18:46:16 · answer #7 · answered by evilmonk66 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
She made a felony phone call?? Ordering a murder? Your sources are corrupt, your information dubious at best.
2007-06-23 16:45:36 · answer #8 · answered by Frank R 7 · 2⤊ 9⤋
Since it was illegally tapped, it cannot be used in court.
2007-06-23 18:48:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋
no
2007-06-24 16:40:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋