says as truth? They believe Rosie when she says "Fire cannot melt steel". They believe Bush is an incompetent fool but yet believe he was the mastermind behind 9/11.
2007-06-23 15:38:15 · 31 answers · asked by wallyshields 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Very humorous.
2007-06-23 15:48:50 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
#1. Fox News is propaganda!
Michael Moore is a filmmaker not a news anchor!
People who like to get the facts and then make up their minds are the only people I reference to!
#2. The thing that Rosie didn't argue accurately is that the temperature of the fires in the WTC were NOT hot enough to melt steel!
Jet fuel burns at around 1500 degrees!
It takes much higher temperatures to weaken steel!
Science does NOT lie...it is based on actual evidence!
#3. Bush is an incompetent fool!
He is not the mastermind but rather the latest puppet of the wealthy globalists who run our country and much of the world like the Rockefellers and the Morgans ....those wealthy rich conniving traitors of the constitution of the United States of America!
2007-06-23 16:19:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's funny, I don't believe everything Michael Moore says is the truth. I don't believe Rosie as I know fire can melt steel. I do not believe Bush was the mastermind behind 9-11, I do however believe he is an incompetent fool.
Fox News IS propaganda crap.
2007-06-23 15:44:19 · answer #3 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 8⤊ 2⤋
I don't believe everything Michael Moore says or puts in his films and I don't know too many other Liberals who do. I also don't let Michael Moore's opinions sway my own opinions. Proof of this is in the fact that I thought Bush was a f*cking idiot before "Farenheit 9-11" was even released!
I also think Rosie is a fat moron who should be forced to sew her mouth shut for all of eternity. She does NOT speak for intelligent liberals out there. She speaks for annoyingly pushy militant homosexuals who decide that their sexual preference entitles them to have a chip on their shoulder.
You keep attacking liberals because of these celebrities. I have not seen one post out of you that gives an intelligent argument against Hillary, Obama or any other Democrat. Just a lot of nonsense crap about Michael Moore, Rosie and so forth.
I'm tired of arguing with you. It's like bringing a gun to a rubber-band fight. I am way too educated and way too intelligent to have a debate with someone as obviously stupid as yourself.
Come back when you can argue like a big boy and not some piss-pants, poop-butt crybaby who's taunting kids on the playground because he's lonely and no one will play with him. Jeez! Does your dad know that you're this big of a wussy?
2007-06-26 09:54:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most American media is right wing, it's just what you call left wing is still pretty right wing but closer to centre. Try comparing it to some decent non-American media some time (which generally is less one sided than American media - biases still present of course but more balanced in many cases). I think anyone who gets their information from just one or two (or even from just a handful of) sources is going to be pretty narrow and one sided in their viewpoints.
Michael Moore and his 'documentaries' are anything but neutral, though as another poster pointed out he is clearly a movie maker and not trying to pass off what he's selling as news.
Rosie O'Donnell is annoying and pretty dumb... yes fire CAN melt steel but not at the temperatures involved in 9/11... of course steel doesn't actually need to melt anyway for a building to collapse, it just needs to lose some structural integrity which happens at far lower temperatures than the melting point of steel. In actuality if there was molten steel (which is far from proven as I'm given to understand it) then it is a point against the official version of 9/11, steel doesn't melt at the temperatures that could possibly have been encountered from burning jet fuel or office supplies alone - if there wasn't any molten steel then it makes sense according to the official version. Not entirely sure what Rosie was trying to say there, like I said - she's pretty dumb. Again though, last time I heard she wasn't trying to pass herself off as presenting news... just as another opinionated TV celebrity.
As for Bush being an incompetent fool... couldn't say, I don't know the guy. But I will say this - he didn't rise to power based on his own merit, he owes his presidency to a fair number of others and therefore he is a weak leader. He is incapable of going against the agenda of those who put him in power - I don't feel he could have masterminded anything... but that isn't the same as saying that I think people are being told the whole story, that would be an unusual situation really.
2007-06-23 16:06:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Michael Moore is a very tiny industry compared to media mogul Murdock and Fox News...Moore isn't on 24/7. Besides, we Liberals know he's biased, we just respect the fact that he is showing what the Conservatives and the Bush Admin. might actually be like behind the curtain and the mirrors...Fox News and Moore are both propaganda, but the lies told by Fox are a mountain compared to what one man can do. Funny thing is that when Dan Rather made a serious goof, he was "retired"...when O'Reilly tells lies after lies, Fox watchers rejoice and his job is more secure
2007-06-23 15:50:58 · answer #6 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'll start believing what conservative talk radio & the liberal media have to say when they show a little even-handedness. The fact that con radio bashes Democrats daily but never talks about the Republican's own sins (and there are many) says to me that they are biased & have an agenda. If they do end up talking about GOP problems, they always spin, minimize or downplay the severity of it. Same goes for the other side. I don't believe anyone unless they can show a little intellectual honesty. Even then, I take it with a grain of salt.
2007-06-23 15:45:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
how are you able to rather watch Fox information and invoice O'Reilly and then call invoice Maher a liar. If the Nazi social gathering have been alive and properly O'Reilly would be their propaganda minister. And something of the staffers at Fox would nonetheless be saluting him. look into previous Rupert and the British scandal. Does anybody relatively think of that Fox has any valid declare to the fact. provide me Maher any day. He laughs at human beings yet does not attempt to destroy lives. on your so-observed as democracy, you look to have self belief that basically one social gathering has a franchise on honesty and fact. God save the international.
2016-10-03 00:56:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As if Moore goes around saying his documentaries are "fair and balanced" BTW, since I dont regard Moore as truthful about everything, think Rosie is an idiot regarding 9/11 and that Bush is too stupid to be a mastermind of anything. Guess that makes you a generalizing douchebag retard.
2007-06-23 15:41:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Yep, haven't liked any of Moore's movies, thought he twisted the truth, and that was way before 9/11. Rosie, I've never liked either.
2007-06-23 15:46:01 · answer #10 · answered by rz1971 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
At least he isn't trying to hide his bias unlike Fox Noise (We're fair and balanced!)
On Rosie, did you take a poll or something?
2007-06-23 16:08:47 · answer #11 · answered by Liberals love America! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋