Politics - 3 June 2007

2007-06-03 15:37:00 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-03 15:34:24 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-03 15:29:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Conservative policies have destroyed America's manufacturing base and middle class. They have eroded our liberty to a point unheard of since before the American Revolution. They have done away with Habeus Corpus and made torture a policy.

And what is the ONLY plan that Republicans are still peddling?
"Stay the course"

2007-06-03 15:19:30 · 20 answers · asked by dharma_bum48326 3

2007-06-03 15:19:25 · 20 answers · asked by fisherman 3

Within an hour of him becoming an ex president, the hostages were freed. The misery index turned around. The Cold War was won a few years later. Most importantly, once he became an ex president, Reagan came in.

This is a serious question.

2007-06-03 15:10:37 · 24 answers · asked by GOPneedsarealconservative 4

With all of their hatred towards Bush you would think that the Democrats would want to put more qualified and intelligent candidates than these against the Republicans.

2007-06-03 15:07:21 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

The conference on Climate change until after he was out of office?

2007-06-03 15:03:52 · 4 answers · asked by sSuper critic 2

I'd just like your opinions on this..

Do you think that the death penalty is good policy? Why?

By good policy, I mean that it achieves positive results (benefits society) but is also practical and fair...?

Thanks!

2007-06-03 14:55:07 · 19 answers · asked by Emily 7

FACT: The supposed hijackers miraculously made it past security checks and cameras without being seen, and without showing up on film.

FACT: The BBC did a bit of rudimentary research and found that 9 of the hijackers were still alive….so why haven’t the feds revised their list of suspects!!!! They’ve stuck to their cover story for 6 years now.

FACT: Muhammad Attas passport miraculously survived the planes inferno and fluttered down to the street in front of the Feds. And why exactly would the man need his passport if he was on a suicide mission anyway?

FACT: The Feds have openly admitted they confiscated 80 security tapes from in and around the pentagon, yet all they could leak out was 4 doctored frames!!!….when it was pointed out that the white vapour trail could only be made by a missile, they tried to say that they never released those frames, and released a second version with carefully added lens flares to obscure the viewfinder. They also tried to say they never released the first version, yet they are the only ones who had the footage!!! Jets use turbo fan engines which do not produce white vapour unless they at very high altitudes where the air is colder!!!


FACT: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI web site. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care if we catch him or not.

FACT: There are hundreds of televised claims from the morning of the attacks saying that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include fire-fighters, police, news reporters, security guards, employees of the WTC and civilians.

FACT : There is video evidence of a massive explosion at street level 3 seconds prior to the first tower collapsing, this is what overturned cars and blew many of them up on the street.

FACT: - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a concrete and steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically at free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as DEMOLITION. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7. Larry is on record as saying.” The decision was made late in the afternoon to pull it” Pull it is demolition slang for imploding a building.
That means the explosives and cutting charges were already in place!!!!

FACT: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence and malpractice in the history of forensics and its also illegal according to US law, as all disaster sites must be preserved for investigative purposes.



FACT: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence, as explosives are the only substance that can turn concrete to dust.

FACT: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24 A.M, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Shanksville Penn. NORAD has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. The Bush Administration changed their story three times.

FACT: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clintons spunk stain on a dress…… - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families and the loss of their loved ones.

FACT: No one has been fired for the failures of 9/11. The Kean report assumed that WTC7 wasn’t important enough to investigate.

FACT: Right before the attack a spike in “put options” on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines increased dramatically and was never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates people knew in advance. Why didn’t the FBI check out these leads? Its impossible to place put options anonymously!!! So why was the investigation stopped?

FACT: In August 6, 2001 A Public Daily Briefing Memo that was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US was brought forward. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travellers, law enforcement, and airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?

FACT: When the United States is under attack the first measure is to secure the President.
The entire nation knew 2 weeks in advance that President Bush would be at Booker Elementary Grade School. Why did his body guards and secret service men let him remain at this location for 20 minutes after the attack? Holding the book “My Pet Goat” upside down while he tried to address a bunch of 5th grade students?


The bottom line is - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Immediately! Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted. Since they determined the conclusion prematurely.

Professor Steven Jones has conclusively proved (using steel samples from 911) that Thermate was used to cut the steel support columns, this is proof that cannot be denied, the best they can do is shut up and try to rubbish his findings on the internet as best they can.

http://www.prisonplanet

2007-06-03 14:48:21 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't understand what the point of a "President" is. Are Americans afraid of democracy?

2007-06-03 14:34:42 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is it that everybody say AMERICANS caused all the terror and war in the world, AMERICANS have ruined the Arab countries. It's as if they think we all had a part in it some how. WE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING, WE JUST LIVE HERE!

2007-06-03 14:05:27 · 22 answers · asked by Riley 3

2007-06-03 13:56:41 · 9 answers · asked by me 5

It doesn't seem fair.

2007-06-03 13:42:26 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

at winning?

2007-06-03 13:41:25 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-03 13:37:27 · 12 answers · asked by Ayoung A 1

2007-06-03 13:36:59 · 11 answers · asked by WJ 7

I'm seeing a lot of partisan and/or racial stereotyping going on here. That's just idiocy. People are posting serious questions and looking for serious answers. If you want to flame each other and troll for attention please go back to IRC. The rest of us want a free exchange of valid information do we not?

2007-06-03 13:33:35 · 5 answers · asked by Dull Jon 6

REPUBLI-CAN
DEMO-CANT

2007-06-03 13:24:59 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=32abc0b0-802a-23ad-440a-88824bb8e528

The Weather Channel’s most prominent climatologist is advocating that broadcast meteorologists be stripped of their scientific certification if they express skepticism about predictions of manmade catastrophic global warming. This latest call to silence skeptics follows a year (2006) in which skeptics were compared to "Holocaust Deniers" and Nuremberg-style war crimes trials were advocated by several climate alarmists.


The Weather Channel’s (TWC) Heidi Cullen, who hosts the weekly global warming program "The Climate Code," is advocating that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) revoke their "Seal of Approval" for any television weatherman who expresses skepticism that human activity is creating a climate catastrophe.

2007-06-03 13:21:31 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-03 13:17:32 · 2 answers · asked by hot dude 1

And for those of who continue to parrot " we are fighting them in Iraq so we won't need to fight them here " , this is NOT a statement of fact; its a pollitical position.

2007-06-03 13:16:50 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

Did he finnally see the light, and try to get some good advice.

2007-06-03 13:06:37 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-na-binladen20may20,0,6432117,full.story?coll=la-home-center

http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2003/cyb20030514.asp

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/122505

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/127nftww.asp

http://billroggio.com/archives/2007/02/alqaedas_antiaircraf.php


Why would they rather deny reality than admit they are bad for America?

2007-06-03 13:02:06 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-03 12:59:48 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

I think it will be barack obama and i hope he does win the nomination

2007-06-03 12:53:11 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

ATTENTION CITIZENS: As part of the Bush Administration's ongoing efforts to obliterate all traces of terrorism in the United States, the Department of Justice has commenced registration* of each and every American Patriot. By registering all non-terrorists within our borders, it is our intention to make use of the process of elimination to identify the evil ones who walk among us. If you are a non-terrorist (American Patriot), your participation is required. Please register below.
- Alberto Gonzales
United States Attorney General

http://www.whitehouse.org/initiatives/patriot/index.asp

2007-06-03 12:51:21 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous

what do you think about?

2007-06-03 12:48:29 · 16 answers · asked by hot dude 1

As a trial lawyer he ruined and devastated many doctors and made malpractice insurance costs skyrocket, passing the inflated health care costs down to the people.

2007-06-03 12:46:55 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Only a Con would suggest that larger enemy numbers is proof of their boy's leadership.

Everyone else calls it a failure.

.

2007-06-03 12:44:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous