2007-06-03 12:59:48 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That is freakin funny!!
2007-06-03 13:02:50 · answer #1 · answered by josh m 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Nope, not the pork. Its his safety device. That way when driving drunk he can float out of the car when it goes into the
Chappaquiddick.
2007-06-03 20:11:13 · answer #2 · answered by hedddon 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because the only things he works out are his hands. He is constantly taking tequila shots and bottles of beer.
2007-06-03 20:18:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Lets just say he has been feeding at the trough for many a year
2007-06-03 20:04:42 · answer #4 · answered by jean 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No.
Actually Massachusetts pays more federal taxes then they get back. Last I checked, they recieve 77 cents for every dollar they pay in federal taxes.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html
======================
It's the Republican Party that is the king of pork.
According to a Congressional Research Service study, the number of earmarks in spending, or appropriations, bills went from 4,126 in 1994 to 15,877 in 2005. The value of those earmarks doubled to $47.4 billion in the same period. Earmarked projects often include roads, bridges and economic development efforts.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2767546&page=3
=========================
Now, the king of the king of pork party is Republican Ted Stevens
His critics call him the "King of Pork" for relentlessly "earmarking" taxpayer dollars to Alaska. In one recent year, according to the watchdog group Citizens Against Government Waste, Stevens sent almost $1,000 per capita to Alaska, 30 times what went to the average state, based on population.
Stevens makes no apologies for the billions of dollars he has sent to Alaska for port facilities, military barracks, water and sewer projects and the Alaska Railroad, just for starters.
"They can call it what they want," Stevens told The Associated Press. "I call it good government."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18080678/
2007-06-03 20:04:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Its math plain and simple.
More calories going in than being burned off.
Eat less, exercise more.
2007-06-03 20:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Booze, eating too much and guilt about Mary Jo!!
2007-06-03 20:05:01 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
His liver makes up about half the weight
2007-06-03 20:04:59 · answer #8 · answered by LIL_TXN 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
All that booze and no exercises and get you that way.
2007-06-03 20:24:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He is bloated from alcohol consumption.
2007-06-03 20:04:48 · answer #10 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋