Politics - 7 July 2006

2006-07-07 14:30:50 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 14:27:47 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 14:16:32 · 17 answers · asked by the_jerk_store_called 1

I've read the book and I feel the plan is transparent and would benefit the country in many ways. I'm tired of having my money taken forcibly. I don't like having a tax code that is impossible to interpret. This seems like an excellent solution.

2006-07-07 14:14:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 14:12:04 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 14:08:38 · 10 answers · asked by matt 2

2006-07-07 13:53:44 · 24 answers · asked by MrCool1978 6

I HEAR THIS OVER AND OVER AGAIN FROM Military Bashing republicns

" the troops knew when they signed up that they could go to war and die and get hurt"

I MEAN these republicans not only are throwing this in our soldiers face but the are telling them basically " HEY YOU SIGNED UP NOW STOP BIT*HING"

As democrats we dont bash our troops and know that they signed up for military service and they could have expected war but we dont throw it in their faces, instead we wish that they would all come home and stop fighting bushs war that was based on imiginary weapons.

I Love America nd love our troops but for republicans to undermine our troops while they are fighting a senceless war based on right wing lies and fabrications is beyound beleif.

2006-07-07 13:52:54 · 14 answers · asked by ast5792 1

Puerto Rico has been a colony for more than 500 years. First under Spain's rule, later over US rule. The head of state is the President of the United States, and no one who lives in the island can vote to elect him. There is a deficit of democracy in this island and the UN is aware, so how can its citizens join the group of nations and enjoy the joys of freedom? I have my own views, let me know yours so we can make it happen.

2006-07-07 13:39:21 · 8 answers · asked by naitiao 1

I would have. Call me a Single Issue Voter, but abortion kills 4,000 people a day, making it WAY more important than any of the other issues on the table. Of course, John Kerry was such a moron, I might have voted 3rd party.

2006-07-07 13:36:47 · 10 answers · asked by bowlingcap 2

I don't think illegal immigrants will get the right to vote for several years, if they get it at all, but I started wondering, if they were to get the right to vote, would lean republican or democrat? Many Mexican immigrants came to America to earn higher wages - very capitalistic and Republican. Many are Catholic and pro-life, and support the church - again, more conservative than liberal. But would they see Republican resistance to amnesty as racist and be inclined to vote Democrat on that one issue?

I am genuinely curious to hear what people think about this. On paper it's easy to peg illegals as liberals, but looking at their motives and religion, they may be closet conservatives.

2006-07-07 13:35:36 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

What do you think of fellow Conservative John Dean's (from Watergate fame) new upcoming book called; "WORSE THAN WATERGATE; THE SECRET PRESIDENCY OF GEORGE W. BUSH", the title obviously speaks for itself, it appears according to John Dean that the current Neoconservative leadership has morphed into something secretive and prone to decpetion, How can you justify this one Cons?

http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/dean.html

2006-07-07 13:31:00 · 7 answers · asked by Elusive 5

I am sick of the blame game, party rhetoric, and fingerpointing from both the left and the right. It's time to end the bickering and the polarization of citizens by party affiliation. We need to kick the DNC and the GOP to the proverbial curb and show them they do not dictate our choises for candidates. America would much rather have centrist representation, IMHO, and the time should be sooner, rather than later.

2006-07-07 13:18:39 · 13 answers · asked by SteveA8 6

Why don't we recognize serious perps as "dangers to themselves and others" and send them off for eval and meds like we do suicides? There are meds and tx available for anger management and psychotic rage. Instead, we blame the victims, trying to get them to be mind readers, and punish them, especially the children, by making them live in shelters and safe houses as fugitives while the perps get out immediately and are free to offend again with no tx, no meds, no psychiatric record, free to buy guns in many cases and much more angry than before. No wonder more victims don't turn the abusers in. Surely, we can pass a law that says it's insane to abuse those who love you, especially your children? The attitude seems to be that its reasonable to lose your temper with your family members and fly into a psychotic rage that does put "others" at risk. But often the victims aren't considered people who count. Why is this? Why in this day and age do we still blame the victims?

2006-07-07 13:16:54 · 4 answers · asked by MLM 1

Republican Oath
I'm a Republican Because...

2006-07-07 13:13:31 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 13:01:41 · 4 answers · asked by teah46 1

2006-07-07 12:57:35 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 12:53:24 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 12:50:39 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 12:47:54 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

what is the benefit of having one-on-one talks with North Korea, instead of multi-party negotiation.

2006-07-07 12:44:40 · 2 answers · asked by cirque de lune 6

1.) Would you vote for a President that has strong ideas but a poor personality OR a President that has a strong personality but poor ideas? (can not possess both strong qualities.)

2.) Which of the two do you think the majority of American citizens would vote for?

2006-07-07 12:42:28 · 11 answers · asked by Bryan 1

i have been on this site all night but .com,just come to uk room,wot a load of illiterate idiots we have here my question is who asks best questions us or uk ?? u decide

2006-07-07 12:34:20 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

Have private political ambitions killed the "philosopher king" ?

2006-07-07 12:30:29 · 21 answers · asked by T C 2

Mitt Romney is thinking of running for president. If he wins, he'll be the first Mormon president. About 17% percent of Americans say they would not vote for a Mormon under any circumstances. That's about the way people felt about a Catholic president before Kennedy got elected. Personally, I'd love to have a true conservative as like Romney as president and I don't care much if he's Mormon. But I'm wondering what ya'll think.
FYI: Most Mormons don't endorse polygamy anymore.

2006-07-07 12:29:48 · 23 answers · asked by bowlingcap 2

2006-07-07 12:25:37 · 11 answers · asked by bowlingcap 2

2006-07-07 12:25:24 · 22 answers · asked by seishinshinobi 1

2006-07-07 12:16:37 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

Most conservatives seem to be disinterested with the idea of finding alternative sources for energy, recycling, eliminating the need for fossil fuels, and adopting an earth-friendly strategy. Why is this??

2006-07-07 12:15:36 · 11 answers · asked by figaro1912 3

view www.loosechange911.com

2006-07-07 12:15:04 · 7 answers · asked by spreetray 2