Would you have changed your vote if John Kerry had been pro-life and George Bush had been pro-choice?

Question

I would have. Call me a Single Issue Voter, but abortion kills 4,000 people a day, making it WAY more important than any of the other issues on the table. Of course, John Kerry was such a moron, I might have voted 3rd party.

Answer 1

I would have thought long and hard, but still voted for Bush - his views on most other issues would out-weigh abortion, but it would not be an easy choice to swallow. I might have looked at where the libertarian or constitution party candidates stood on the issue.

With that said, I can't think of a single pro-life democrat except Bob Casey, the PA senate candidate running against Senator Santorum. And that's why the Democrats have been out of power for so many years... there are lots of church go-ers who used to vote democrat who have become confused lately.

Answer 2

professional-life? so as that could recommend that absolutley all human life is sacred even the undeveloped ones. So how a procedures back do we take this? Is a women human beings effectively killing a a threat little one each time she menstruates? Are we dooming the subsequent savior by employing no longer screwing each time the prospect provides itself? How approximately masturbation? Is that sinful by way of fact possibly the pearl jam left on the kleenex consists of the 2d coming? With how affordably totally developed human life is taken care of it sort of feels stupid to me to abort ones that that don;t actually have a pulse yet. i'm professional-decision one hundred%. think of roughly if say the inhabitants of india might desire to be decrease into 2/3 in one technology. Poverty there may be extensively decreased. we'd desire to constantly a lot of human beings in the international to stay comforably. there's a reason the extra education you have the fewer young ones you have. the two have much less young ones or prepare for a international wherein we live in sqaulor and poverty

Answer 3

Nope. I didn't like Kerry's "tea-time" rhetoric about how to handle terrorists. And just last week I saw him on a program being interviewed and he simply would not answer a question about whether he would consider using the military. He was in a pickle, knew the only way to get around that one was to ignore it and skirt around and change the subject.

Answer 4

No, it wouldn't have changed my vote. It wouldn't have changed the fact that Kerry doesn't know how to handle the War on Terror.

Kkahn: Hey, quick question for ya. Did you call for Clinton to send Chelsea to the Balkans? No? Somehow I didn't think so.

Answer 5

My vote would have stayed the same,,JOHN KERRY,,I'm pro choice,,,let the people decide what to do with their body,,not the government or that stupid son of ***** in the white house now,,killing our young men and women in the Iraq/Afgahistan war for what stupid reason are they dieing for!!let George send his daughters over there to fight!!

Answer 6

No - shouldn't really be that big of an issue regarding presidential elections. No president can make law, or interpret law; the abortion issue is one that is influenced by congress and the supreme court. True, the president nominates jurists to the bench; but they have to be approved by the senate.

Answer 7

I hate Abortion but I think I hated Kerry even more, but I support your way of thinking and to tell the truth, I'd have to really pray about it.

Answer 8

Absolutely NOT. Kerry was Scarey!!!

Answer 9

Good point, hard call.

Answer 10

if only pigs could fly