English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 7 July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

2006-07-07 04:30:06 · 14 answers · asked by The "Spence" 2

Ok,so I'm havin' a little Friday fun with a "save the babies" nutcase.
It's a little crass.But the point is,even if the are a lot of people who want to use abortion as a poltical issue,why dont republicans support more programs for poor children?
They seem to be more pro-birth than pro-life.

2006-07-07 04:27:18 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 04:27:17 · 11 answers · asked by Kevin S 1

0

Why do the Neocons express extreme exasperation toward women who speak their minds, stand up for what they believe in and don’t buy into their archaic, obtuse and domineering agenda?

Kinda reminds me of someone.....the Taliban perhaps?

2006-07-07 04:26:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

I believe that the majority of citizens in the US, unless belonging to minority groups or educated in systems theories and the effects of oppression, believe in the old adage that people who are in need simply should pull themselves up by the bootstraps. Often oversimplification of social problems compounds the problem and leaves those in need without the help they need. Conservatives would call this position whiny liberalism which is exactly the removed and callous position which is making problems in the US and around the world worse. It is not chance that conservatives being in power in the most influential and powerful nation in the world correlates with the worst foreign relations the US has had in decades. Imagine for a minute that those in need cannot simply pull themselves up by the so-called bootstraps. Imagine that hunger, poverty, crime, are directly linked to social systems and dynamics which need to be change by those in power. If true, what would it mean for you?

2006-07-07 04:21:43 · 5 answers · asked by keith 2

doesnt sound like a desicive leader.

2006-07-07 04:16:07 · 19 answers · asked by david c 4

For more information and on-site pictures, go to

http://www.zombietime.com/

Then, click on "naked bike ride", the third link on the page. *They are really nude pics of liberals on bikes*

2006-07-07 04:15:32 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 04:15:03 · 5 answers · asked by tomsbritton 1

such as richard clarke.

2006-07-07 04:12:14 · 4 answers · asked by david c 4

2006-07-07 04:11:12 · 14 answers · asked by midi_junkie 3

Sometimes attempts at peace dont work. Thoughts?

2006-07-07 04:05:47 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Has PC passed it's sell by date? Or has is it still fighting back? I think it's still very much with us unfortunately.

2006-07-07 04:05:15 · 14 answers · asked by cognito44 3

(a) Taking a nice hearty piss?

(b) Taking a nice healthy dump?

(c) Being able to get out of bed BEFORE you do either in the morning?

2006-07-07 04:00:55 · 26 answers · asked by ajibik 1

It gets me how these intellectuals say Bush is dumb, but they can be "duped" so easily.

Let's not forget this, either.

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
-Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of Mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-Senator Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

2006-07-07 03:57:41 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 03:56:35 · 12 answers · asked by don 6

2006-07-07 03:47:11 · 4 answers · asked by teambargain 6

2006-07-07 03:43:38 · 21 answers · asked by teambargain 6

Just curious...

2006-07-07 03:41:56 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 03:41:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-07 03:36:51 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Those communist bastards are at it again. They are not admitting that the rice pickers are making the world a dangerous place.

2006-07-07 03:36:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since all these celebrities are coming in with their big questions about the world I decided to ask one myself. I expect to be sorting through the worse to find the best.

2006-07-07 03:21:43 · 6 answers · asked by The One Truth 4

What do people mean when they say that the media in America Has a liberal Bias? Can you give specific examples? I watch the news and I don't really see it...Can someone please explain

2006-07-07 03:16:21 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I hope that in my lifetime we have a United States of Europe to give the world's bully (the US) a bloody nose?

Increasingly much of Europe is keen on coming together and it may happen.

2006-07-07 02:59:54 · 14 answers · asked by J W 1

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia = good ... Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq = bad.

Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia = good ... Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq = bad.

Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia = good ... Bush imposes regime change in Iraq = bad

Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists = good ... Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator = bad.

Clinton bombs Chinese embassy = good ... Bush bombs terrorist camps = bad.

Clinton commits felonies while in office = good ... Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit = bad.

No mass graves found in Serbia = good ... No WMD found Iraq = bad.

Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton = good ... Economy on upswing under Bush = bad.

Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden = good ... World Trade Centers fall under Bush = bad.

Clinton says Saddam has nukes = good ... Bush says Saddam has nukes = bad.

The list could go on and on ...

2006-07-07 02:44:58 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers