2006-07-07 12:50:39 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have (I voted for Nader in 2000) and would again. Unfortunately, the system is too skewed against 3rd parties for them to make much of a dent, though.
2006-07-07 12:59:23 · answer #1 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ralph Nader? You've got to be kidding.
The man bought a truck load of shoes back in 1950 or something, just so he'd never have to pay for them later on. He's never been married, has no kids, he's basically a hermit. And Ralph Nader has been a huge influence in larger government regulations.
2006-07-07 12:54:17 · answer #2 · answered by kathy059 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never Ralph Nader. But if the candidate had American values and cares about the American people then i would vote for that person. I don't want a president who only sees people as votes and only care about certain groups of people. Politicians today are pathetic and only have themselves in mind and their own interests.
2006-07-07 12:55:38 · answer #3 · answered by Ryan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ralph Nader is not honest. Hes a politician just like the rest of them.
2006-07-07 12:53:29 · answer #4 · answered by godoompah 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I would, if I knew that they had a chance to win, and they weren't Nader. I liked him at the beginning of 2004, but after doing some more research on his views, I didn't like him so much. He has okay ideas, but I don't think he's right for president.
2006-07-07 12:59:03 · answer #5 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
voting for an independent is irresponsible. You know good and well that they are not going to win and it's just whack jobs voting for other whack jobs. They get just enough votes to screw things up. They do it to piss people off, no other reason. It's certainly not because they have any clue about what this loose cannon is talking about. I personally cannot stand Republicans but i have respect for a die hard Republican. I believe in party loyalty. Independents need to pick a party already and quit swinging the elections and ruining everything.
2006-07-07 13:03:03 · answer #6 · answered by eydieville 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have hit on exactly what this country needs !! A good honest independent candidate. Lets get the ball rolling !!
NOT Nader though !!
2006-07-07 12:57:32 · answer #7 · answered by meimmoody 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but the words "presidential candidate" and "honest" can't be used in the same sentence since its an oxymoron. There is no such thing as an honest politician! And Bush is the biggest shyster of all. The only thing is he's hiding behind God and the bible and people believe he's such a nice person. Wake up, America!!!
2006-07-07 13:43:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would
But you need to understand that there is both physical and genetic differences between Democrats and Republicans.
People are born with the proclivity to vote for a particular party. Similar to the born gay theory most people are born redpublican. Like having brown hair and brown eyes republicans are in the majority.
Check the difference in the length of your index finger and your ring finger. The shorter your ring finger the more likely you are to be redpublican.
This is all decided by what your mother ate on the 16th. week of her pregnancy. High protein republican low protein democrat.
2006-07-07 13:03:08 · answer #9 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if I thought he might win. He might try an internet straw vote or something.
But not Ralph Nader.
2006-07-08 05:35:40 · answer #10 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋