English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 6 July 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

Guess how many times Osama Bin Laden was mentioned? Give up? ONE time. Yep, that's it. By John McCain.

HMMMMMMMMMM......

BTW, at the Democratic convention, it was mentioned 7 times, all by Kerry.

2006-07-06 05:56:50 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why is it that liberals are wrong on every issue, yet insist that they are only being "open minded." Isn't it better to have morals/convictions/beliefs than to be all "every thing's ok, I'm open to new ideas, believe what's true to you." How come they preach individuality, and yet want to turn the US into a communist state? how come they can't rationalize anything? Why do they avoid a direct answer to any question? Why do they think free speech is so great? Look where it's gotten them. Why do they think that the definition of conservative is "George W Bush"? Why will most of the liberals "answering" this question only rant about how I'm a closed minded bigot, and not really answer anything? Why don't we just shoot them all?

2006-07-06 05:51:17 · 19 answers · asked by Churchill 1

2006-07-06 05:47:53 · 38 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

2006-07-06 05:45:33 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

what is a county's political gain when they possess nuks?

2006-07-06 05:44:34 · 11 answers · asked by nelcoll2000 1

The 9/11 commission verified that Iraq had no proven connection to terrorism....And there are thousands of dictators out there ..Why arent we in North Korea???

2006-07-06 05:42:36 · 12 answers · asked by ? 2

We had "no doubt that Saddaam Hussein had started his nuclear program," even though he was not posing an immediate threat to us and that intelligence was later proven to be faulty. We were told that there was proof of him having nuclear weopons and was planning to use them. Thus, we invaded and overthrew him and his regime.
North Korea has shown us the weopons, pointed them at us, and fired some in our direction. We have undeniable proof that Kim Jong Il has every intention of using them to some capacity. But now, we are going to handle this diplomatically. Why is it when we have seen the weapons in use and know North Korea's intent, we don't do anything, but when we are not provoked, we attack?
I am genuinely confused by this. I'm not saying we should go and start bombing them, but this tactic is just "bass ackward" as they say. Does anyone have an opinion on this matter?
I know I'm going to be criticized, so bring it on.

2006-07-06 05:39:01 · 16 answers · asked by bluejacket8j 4

or the next attack of america to any country naming War on Terror.

2006-07-06 05:35:06 · 3 answers · asked by shaheen 1

A fraud for being percieved by many NEOCONS as intelligent, articulate, and insightful, this is the biggest joke since oxycontin addict Rush Limbaugh got busted a week and a half ago, LOL!

http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/copycatty_coulter_pilfers_prose__pro_nationalnews_philip_recchia.htm

2006-07-06 05:29:45 · 21 answers · asked by Dr.Feelgood 5

While Kim Jong II plays god, his people starve. 25% have military jobs and the others starve and rot in prisons? Should we invade and host a regime change? Should we foster rebellion and smuggle arms? Or matbe we are too busy saving Iraq from muslimism to care.

2006-07-06 05:22:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

The vast majority of the questions I see coming from libs are loaded, leading, and usually sexual in nature. Such stimulating questions like " If Bush was a disease what would he be?" or "Is Bush a closet Homosexual" or "Does Condi Rice have sex" These questions address no real topics and I think show a lack of intelligence.

2006-07-06 05:22:22 · 17 answers · asked by Ethan M 5

Or do you believe a true democracy can only be achieved through a popular vote? It seems strange to me that the politician with less votes from the people can become elected as president.

2006-07-06 05:20:10 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-06 05:13:17 · 9 answers · asked by Ashley 1

Stupid, Christian Hypocrites, White Trash, Conservative Pigs, Sexcist, Racist, Rednecks, Cowboys, Under Cover Homo Sexuals, Arab killers, Imperialist, Rapist, Killers, Corporate Pigs, and most of all Communistic blood sucking bastards

2006-07-06 05:09:23 · 20 answers · asked by Mary D 1

We know who the true disfunctional idiots are= LIBERALS
You weren't born stupid liberals, you're just lazy.

2006-07-06 05:05:20 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Im not asking for a fight between liberals and democrats here. The question is simply asking whether you believe President Bush and his team are legitimate honest people with Americas best interest at heart?

2006-07-06 04:57:57 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

And I ask this because with our current situation of having the majority of our forces in the Middle East, and knowing that Bush won't withdraw them, then wouldn't congress have to draft in order to fight N Korea?

2006-07-06 04:54:51 · 21 answers · asked by peacebro167 2

and pro-creation cannot occur and has no legal merit purely on the basis of anal sex and taco bumping? That WE the people get to define what a marriage is and that the court should not legilate its mores from the bench?

2006-07-06 04:47:55 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do libs really hate the USA that much?

2006-07-06 04:43:48 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

no child left behind, war in iraq

2006-07-06 04:37:59 · 14 answers · asked by david c 4

I've also heard them called "Sheeple"...sheep-people.
Where does the term come from and why is it used?

2006-07-06 04:34:29 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

such as social security, disability act, family medical leave act, banking act, school lunch programs, hud, fair housing act, civil rights act, pro-union policies, miranda law, etc. the list goes on and on.......

2006-07-06 04:28:09 · 12 answers · asked by david c 4

fedest.com, questions and answers