a good pres that cheated on his wife of course. i'm a hell of a lot more interested in the security of the country then the security of The presidents marriage
2006-07-06 05:01:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by coconut 3
·
4⤊
3⤋
I voted for President Clinton both times and I still feel that the Republicans paid her off to do that to him cause if she really cared about Bill she would have kept her mouth shut and not said a word about the dress. That's my opinion as an American Democrat! And I'd rather have the first on your list anyday cause there is an awlful lot of men that cheat and get away with it and a lot more in the White House that was never found out about and some that were ! Clinton has a high I.Q. and is working with G.Bush senior now to do more for our country than son Bush . Clinton was even at the Trade Towers before Bush was after 9-11.
2006-07-06 05:04:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ₦âħí»€G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
9 attacks on American soverignity good?????? Say Clinton was good to the soldiers who lost lives in Somalia and the USS Cole, with Clinton's response to cut and run. Or how about our multiple embassies targetd and exploded, without any response from Clinton?
Since 9/11 we have no been attacked on our soil. So far, I would give that advantage to Bush.
Domestically speaking, unemployement is lower under ush than Clinton. Average mean income, take-home pay, and home ownership is up under Bush over Clinton, as also is the quantity of people that invest in the marketplace. Even the production factor of GDP is up under Bush versus Clinton. Yet again, facts outweigh rhetoric.
What we had under Clinton was a care-free attitude. The economy was OK, but the stock market roared. Too many people confuse the stock market with the economy. Under Bush, we have a weaker stock market, but a stronger economy.
I love sophmoric analysis that ignores basic economics.
Clinton did do a few good things though, being Serbia and his involvement in N. Ireland. He FUBBed N Korea, and is responsible for them having nukes and rockets. He also screwed Israel on the 'peache' BS he tried.
It comes down to one simple thing. You can sell spinach or ice cream. Noone shops at the spinach truck, but it is what you need. Everyone buys from the ice cream truck. Clinton sells ice cream, Bush spinach.
Just because one takes an honest look at the presidency of Clinton, does not make them a Clinton basher. Bush has his mistakes as well, like he spends too much tax dollars and does not veto.
2006-07-06 05:10:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by lundstroms2004 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem with your question is that Bill Clinton was a bad president who cheated on his wife and treated the Oval office like his own personal whore house. I'm not saying that everything President Llinton did was bad or that everything President Bush does is good but over all I think President Bush is a much better President. BTW I never bashed President Clinton personally I did criticize his policies.
2006-07-06 05:04:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Clinton was a mediocre president who cheated on his wife. People who think he was a good president are not conversant with the reality of the Clinton years.
Bush is a good (not great) president who has very high moral standards.
2006-07-06 05:02:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask the veterans of Somalia how they feel about Clinton. Lead though principles and with conviction, not through news polls. But I don't think Clinton was a total disaster. Did some good, some not so good. Better than far left dems.
2006-07-06 05:08:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by alieneddiexxx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love it when the CLINTON BJ(or Oval Sex in the Oral Office)
is compared to fabricating tale of WMD's in order to justify Invasion of Iraq.
So what if he fumbled and mumbled and tried to weasel his way out of it.
Big deal.
Who the hell wants to confess to getting a BJ to the nation, on TV, at PRIMETIME?
The Puritan in AMERICA is still strong.
We expect public confessions and contrition for a midnight BJ which was nobodies business.
But exaggerated fabrications to justify invasion of IRAQ is starting to be viewed as...
"oh that again! When you gonna get off that subject?"
They really think the BJ was worse.
Anyway....who the hell knows what kind of arrangement Bill and Hillery had.
FDR has affair with Secretary.
He smoked cigarette from long cigarette holder and mixed Martinis.
Eleanor may have had affairs.
LBJ called staffers into bathroom to discuss presidential business. While he was sitting on his presidential toilet. Pinching a loaf.
We don't even tolerate eccentricities anymore.
Even in the darkest days of the sixties and seventies.
Viet Nam, assassinations, riots. Recession, inflation, oil embargo.
Those days were a HOOT compared to the brave new millennium.
2006-07-06 05:24:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please give us your performance grade on these Clinton achievements:
Selling of missile secrets to China
Selling of the Lincoln bedroom for campaign contributions
Travel department scandal
Raping of two women
Signing of treaty with N. Korea that provided the finances necessary for them to get the nuke
Not taking care of OBL
Allowing Islamic terror to gain momentum
Cut and run in Mogadishu
Doing NOTHING after WTC1
Doing NOTHING after Cole Bombing
Doing NOTHING after Saudi tower bombings
Lobing a cruise missile to a camels *** as a diversion to the Lewinski scandal
Signing NAFTA
Signing Don't Ask Don't Tell policy
Stoking the Internet bubble
Doing nothing to combat corporate corruption and cooking the books to stoke said bubble
Weakened our military capabilities
Weakened our intelligence capabilities
Absurdly raided the house where a little cuban boy was being protected by his family and sent him back to Cuba
Burned to death scores of people in Waco
Oh, I guess he and Gore did do one good job: invented the internet and gave us the definition of what is is.
2006-07-06 05:05:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's no way of knowing if Bush cheated or not...
Just love Clinton. He was just being a man. 99% of men would have done what he did, if they met Monica. 5% would have confessed. 0.001% would have a wife who still maintained peace in public! Long live Bill and Hillary!
2006-07-06 05:03:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Wrobinhood 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well maybe if we had had a good president that cheated on his wife versus a bad one that didnt, but didnt notice we had agood one that cheated. We sure were taxed to death, and our national security was weakened to the point we were attacked on 9/11. I think Bush has done a suburb job with what he was left with!
2006-07-06 05:04:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by no/evil/surmiser 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
David - I cannot thank you enough for displaying the warped train of thought you liberals have.
People look at the highly intelligent liberals thought process - He has the gumption to actually correlate good president & adultery. This sums up the mental diesease that liberals have - good president = adulterer & appeaser
bad president = loyal husband & protector
need I say more?
2006-07-06 07:02:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by therandman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋