Start poppin em and I'll drag em to hell.
2006-07-06 05:55:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by da1U<32haT3 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why is it that liberals are wrong on every issue, yet insist that they are only being "open minded." –Hypocrisy, if you were open minded person yourself, you could see both sides of an issue and would not say liberals are “wrong”.
Isn't it better to have morals/convictions/beliefs than to be all "every thing's ok, I'm open to new ideas, believe what's true to you.” –Live and let live. Telling everyone they must live by the teachings of jesus is not any different than a Muslim jihad.
How come they preach individuality, and yet want to turn the US into a communist state? -Read the 14th amendment, do you consider this communism? Republicans “sidestep” the issue and say communist as a scare tactic.
how come they can't rationalize anything? (Sentences start with a CAPITOL letter.)
Why do they avoid a direct answer to any question? –If you don’t listen to the answer, you wont hear it.
Why do they think free speech is so great? Look where it's gotten them. –Are you saying as a REPUBLICAN you do not support Freedom of Speech?
Why do they think that the definition of conservative is "George W Bush"? –The Republican party supports GWB, he is the party leader. GWB is not a conservative, due to his un-conservative nature each tax paying American now owes China $20,000 due to money borrowed by GWB administration.
Why will most of the liberals "answering" this question only rant about how I'm a closed minded bigot, and not really answer anything? –You have to ask a real question and want a real answer, not ask a stupid question to start a conflict.
Why don't we just shoot them all? –A Fascists remark, true to Republican nature!
2006-07-06 11:17:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shoot them all huh? Geese that doesn't sound close minded at all does it. Who's to say the liberals are wrong on ANY issue? There is no liberal out there looking to change the United States towards communism. Who are you kidding that liberals avoid answers to direct questions? Don't you watch CNN and how the President, Donald Rumsfeld, Condaleeza Rice, or any other member of the administration constantly avoid any question that has to do with Iraq, Afghanistan, the current economic turmoil this country, or the "War on Terror" abroad.Because they were wrong and wont admit to their mistakes in fear of making themselves look like the coniving liars that they are. Where did you grow up? HMMM... Let me guess in a rural, protestant, White house hold in a town with 250 people none of them a minority I'm sure. How can you support a party unwilling to accept the fact that our society is evolving? It's great to have morals and convictions, but when you attempt to persuade the whole to believe only what you believe then you are a close minded biggot. We live in a society that has a multitude of sub cultures and religions that all have something to offer and your inabilty to see that these people may have something valid to contribute to societies growth truly shows that the country is in severe trouble because there are people like you still living in it. If anything you need to rationalize your thoughts before sharing them with the world, you sir are the one who needs to be shot!
2006-07-06 06:11:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by nickygets 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think what you need to realize is that none of this really matters. No matter what morals or ethic code you run (read:ruin) your life with, you will always perceive the world in distortion. Liberals appear "wrong" to you because you are trying to look at everyone on the other side of a large wall.
I'm not trying to judge you. Everyone has these same issues. In fact, if I was trying to judge you, that would make me a hypocrite. Not to say that I'm not a hypocrite--I'm sure I do and say tons of things that contradict each other. I think everyone just needs to get past this wall we've built around each other, and the only way to do this is to stop caring. Stop applying labels to each other like "conservative" or "liberal" or "communist", etc. Each one of these names is just a small hole carved out in the wall. When you are looking through them, you can only see a small portion of reality.
Just forget your opinions and it makes everything so much easier. Seriously. Just take in everything from all sides and then decide which things will work in YOUR life without running (read: ruining, again) someone else's. Who cares if that guy over there is gay--does that REALLY, actually affect you? Do other opinions and free speech burn so deeply in your heart that you want to rip it out and lay on the floor in your own blood? Do all these issues you have create such tension that you would justify a war, one filled with many blood-riddled floors of foreign countries? Because if so, I really don't care.
2006-07-06 06:26:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by saeghwin 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, you've got it just the opposite.
On questions of social issues, liberals are always right.
Conservatives are for the status quo - by definition. Liberals are for progress.
Thus, it was liberals that fought for Civil Rights. They got it right. Conservatives got it wrong (and at that time a lot of them were Democrats at the time, so this isn't about party, it's about philosophy).
Thus, it was liberals that fought for women's suffrage. They got it right, Conservatives got it wrong.
Thus, it was liberals that fought against child labor. They got it right, Conservatives got it wrong.
Thus, it was liberals that are fighting homophobia. All polls suggest that as younger generations take power, they will get it right, and Conservatives will, once again, be judged wrong.
By the way, I love how you complain about being called a bigot, and in the next sentence suggest rounding up and shooting a group of people different from yourself. That really demonstrates how open-minded you are.
2006-07-06 06:04:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by WBrian_28 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, they're not wrong on every issue, but your points about "open-mindedness" and about how they'll respond seem to be on target. They believe in free speech for EVERYONE...who agrees with them. If you don't, you need to just shut the f**k up. If you disagree, offering a different opinion, you're "closed-minded". It's funny how they don't even see their own hypocrisy.
Jim W: Way to make the questioner's point. Bravo for you! :)
2006-07-06 06:02:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Chris S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
you're holding that technology, it really is in conserving with observable actuality and the truly suited seek for for shown fact, as adverse to faith, which persons have self belief because they were born into the acceptance of a bronze age e book's fact, is indoctrination? A e book which there is not any extra reason to have self belief than the Quran? No. and do not pretend everyone's promotion homosexuality. Marriage equality, even if, surely is promoted, because the in straightforward words secular arguments adverse to adverse to gay marriage, ie. the potential of gays to enhance toddlers, were disproven. Now on voter fraud, no. Neither liberals, nor everyone else helps that. surely you'll locate situations of voter fraud on both section, yet this surely characterises neither majority. Now as in conserving with revolt, what? What revolt? No, no one's rebelling, although i'd argue that the Tea Partiers espouse revolt, and take it as their significant topic, so your argument is ridiculous. Now for the "evil equipment of socialism" it really is a gross misrepresentation of political idea. surely organic socialism does not artwork, yet what about organic capitalism (note that the US is blended - neither organic socialism nor organic capitalism) a equipment it really is largely dependant on social darwinism (a equipment, through ways, that Darwin found undesirable and disgraceful) a equipment in which ability without delay will develop into centred, and the poorer are abused and powerless. seem at city workers contained in the previous due 1800's, at the same time as organic capitalism reigned. And through ways, medicare, veteran's advantages, police departments, hearth departments, our defense force, public education, application artwork, those are all socialized platforms, so evaluate what you're generalizing. And through ways, you understand Jesus supported communalization of belongings and welfare, replaced right into a homeless vagrant, and preached that you should pay your taxes (provide to Caesar what's Caesar's,) precise? And as a liberal atheist, i'm very a lot adverse to abortion, as replaced into Christopher Hitchens.
2016-11-05 23:45:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tell ya what there, scooter, actually ask a single question and we'll see if we can't help you out with an answer, k?
Oh, and here's a hint: Asking a loaded question, one that already assumes an answer as part of it's own structure is disengenuous, dishonest and is really more of a statement than a question.
2006-07-06 06:03:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you answered your own questionin your next to last sentence
Let me ask you, is having morals opposing abortion then sending 18 yr olds out to die?
Who said we want the US to turn into a communist state???
Ask a direct question and we will answer.
Why is free speech so great? Are you joking?
Are you provoking hatred and violence?
2006-07-06 06:00:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We should be happy when they start throwing the terms like hate and war monger at us. To me that proves to me they having nothing constructive left to say in a debate. However, my all time favorite thing I have been told by the extreme fringe of the democrats is we are just to stupid to understand.
2006-07-06 06:09:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals all are nuts lets face it. They have no morals and only gays and lesbians, and hippies to back them up. Un fortunately we can't shoot them because then we'd be going against our morals. But I totally understand.
2006-07-06 05:55:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by ldschick 1
·
0⤊
0⤋