Other - Politics & Government - September 2007

Considering Marvin Bush ran security for the trade center.

Considering Blackwater is providing arms so that an eney can actually fight (perpetuate the war).

Considering Alberto Gonzales personally pressured a sick Ashcroft for the Pariot act.

Considering Diabold rigged election machines 2 elections in a row.

Considering there never was any reason to go to Iraq.

Considering Tillman was a total coverup.

Considering Jessica Lynch was a total lie to rally republican support.

Any president to be republican or democrat would rightfuly investigate Bush. Just for integrity of the constituuion and the country.

To date Bush plays his little "executive privilage" game. So after Bush is no longer the president he can't use his "executive privilage" scam.

So what really will Bush do to prevent being investigated? At all costs, what will bush do to stop any sensible president to be from investigating all the lies, crimes, disregard for the constitution, etc?

2007-09-22 05:02:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

but also federally funded? One court case set the standard for the ENTIRE country, no matter what the people felt. 9 individuals made this decision for the whole country...I think the people should have a say through electing their representatives (you know, the way the constitution says?)...I honestly don't care what the end result of that would be, just that it is done properly...
Second, do they not realize that our income taxes would go toward abortion if it were federally funded? So even those who are morally against abortion would then be paying for them...Why is that okay with you? Because you got what you wanted? Because they are "wrong" to feel that way?

I just want to know what the rationale is.
Thanks!

2007-09-22 04:52:49 · 10 answers · asked by monkiby 2

Why US has to make the decision where to send Noriega the ex-dictator from Panama. Isn't the Panamenian goverment who should be making this decision?

2007-09-22 04:51:26 · 5 answers · asked by Richard 3

"milking" America?


someone suggested this to me, and i kinda see his view, but it's foggy. can anyone clear it up. ALL opinions would be apprieciated.

2007-09-22 04:46:30 · 5 answers · asked by daddio 7

please no yes or no answers

2007-09-22 04:36:44 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

please no yes or no answers

2007-09-22 04:34:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

?

2007-09-22 04:33:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

How many of you know that Ahmadinejad is not 1st or even 2nd but actually THIRD in power in Iran? Ayatollah Khameini is 1st - he has pointedly never endorsed Ahmadinejad's contention of the Holocaust. 2nd is Hashemi Rafsanjani, an Iranian moderate elected Sept. 4 to lead the Assembly of Elders.
http://www.iran-press-service.com/ips/articles-2007/september-2007/rafsanjani_victory_6907.shtml

How many of you know that the #1 TV show in Iran today is "Zero Degree Turn", about Jews in pre-WWII Europe? In the show, an Iranian diplomat in Paris is in love with a French Jewish woman and saves her, and 100's of other French Jews, by faking papers to get them out of France.
http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB118912609718220156.html

How many of you know that there is a pro-American democracy movement in Iran, and that they have commemorated (in mourning) the 9/11 attacks?
http://www.daneshjoo.org/article/publish/article_1873.shtml

Don't you think diplomacy with Iran would be GOOD?

2007-09-22 03:50:12 · 13 answers · asked by ? 6

Terrorists may bag a few of us, now and then, and if they ever get their hands on a nuke, we'll be in a real crisis.

But Leftists Congresspersons (i.e., Feinstein, Lautenberg, Schumer), the former two of which try to sneak in freedom-limiting legislation when bills or budget legislation is passed, are bigger threats.

Why? Because they infringe upon the freedoms of all of us. Forever. Or until their garbage laws are overturned or ruled unconstitutional.

While we have enemies abroad, I cannot help but feel we have enemies to freedom back home.

When are we going to realize this and vote these clowns out of office (followed with a congressional censure)?

2007-09-22 03:12:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is an old adage that people only get the Government they deserve. But in a democracy sometimes you have to put up with what everyone else wants even though it is not what you want. Does that mean that you are out of step with most other people? Or is democracy just a big con? Is it out of our hands and just a big scam?

2007-09-22 01:43:13 · 20 answers · asked by cutsie_dread 5

2007-09-22 01:19:03 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Could it be because my beliefs on social liberalism are much more stronger than my beliefs on fiscal conservatism?

2007-09-22 00:18:24 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-21 23:26:22 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-21 23:06:21 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-21 22:57:07 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

OK, I'm an Athiest, and this is not a bash on religion. This is something that bothers me about our country- and this post has NOTHING to do with minors. In our Constitution it states:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. "

This, to me says that everyone has a right to believe the way they want, and practice those beliefs without interference. Why then, is polygamy illegal, and if a religious sect believes in it, why are they forbode in practicing it- when it is their belief? This does assume that all are of legal age, as again this question has NOTHING to do with minors. It seams everything is OK for a freedom of religion, as long as it is a certain religion. So where really, is the freedom?

BTW- I'm a monogamist, but I still see wrong here.

2007-09-21 21:35:10 · 4 answers · asked by Dan 2

to track every move cause isn't it funny how certain sites already know your information be fore you give it and how come they put soooo many info about this and that and I mean everything for people to read between lines and why do they still have test and things like that in school cause the same thing they testing you for let's just in the real world you don't really have to look up nothing because everthing is just a click away so why do they still give test in school and how could so much information be in computers-internet wasn't computers on net really was used for the war way back when or for nasa it use to be for government now any and everybody can use them what's your outlook and I overstand if you don't wan't to answer this question it can be over people had sometimes.

2007-09-21 19:32:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

What do you think will happen in New York on Sunday 9-23-07 or Monday 9-24-07 that might change the world?

2007-09-21 18:55:45 · 15 answers · asked by Gabriel Archangel 3

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.bombsite.com/archive/earle/images/miller.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.bombsite.com/archive/earle/audio/miller.htm&h=251&w=250&sz=29&hl=en&start=12&sig2=an7DrgGnG6fjAuRWeCRDTg&um=1&tbnid=v3hlGg7gIn31_M:&tbnh=111&tbnw=111&ei=A6v0RtKFEJDMgAPerbTmDA&prev=/images%3Fq%3Droger%2Bmiller%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3DGGLG,GGLG:2005-19,GGLG:en%26sa%3DN

In the eyes....got that same look ....like he is holding back a joke.
Saw AHMADINIJAD on TV interview....
after a couple of minutes I thought to myself.....
damn he reminds me of ROGER MILLER....
he could have broke out into song....
(sings)
dang me...dang me
they oughta take a rope and hang me
high from the highest TREEEEEE

2007-09-21 18:49:13 · 7 answers · asked by zes2_zdk 3

in the year 2003

2007-09-21 18:46:29 · 4 answers · asked by slim_tj 2

since the republicans keep saying over and over and over again that Blackwater is a gorup of "professionals" that we need them in Iraq. That the fact that the U.S. armed forces are not good enough for the job- **THAT IN ITSELF IS DISGRACEFUL FOR REPUBLICANS TO SAY**

anyway if wha the republicans say is true, then fine keep blackwater in, and bring the soldiers home. NOW!


If the republicans want to continue to waste tax dollars in Iraq, then at least save the lives of our troops. Don't just sit around and let Blackwater give weapons to some "enemy" that didn't have them before, just to create a viable force.

So any way, lets go a step furhter. The republicans hate the troops. They say Blackwater NEEDS to be in Iraq.

Take the troops out and save their lives. Then let the republicans pay for their Bush war.

I bet if the republicans paid a private company for their Bush war, they'd scream and kick like little babies.

2007-09-21 17:43:03 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

With all that money involved in buying GWB the presidential chair, I'm curious to know what kind of people that funded his election campaign

2007-09-21 17:41:57 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

aside from wasting $3 billion dollars a week in Iraq. Why do we have mercanaries like blackwater doing the job we pay the U.S. military to do?

is blackwater simply an OPFOR designed to keep Iraq out of control? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OPFOR

or is blackwater just a good way to pay someone to do the job that the military is supposed to do? just to waste more American Tax dollars?

which is it?

2007-09-21 17:13:18 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-21 17:00:43 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since Blackwater runs OPFOR tactics to createchaos in Iraq. And now we caught them red handed. Will you continue to stand by Bush and give $3 billion a week to Halliburton, Blackwater, Lockheed,etc. etc. etc. ?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/09/21/blackwater.probe.ap/index.html

"WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal prosecutors are investigating whether employees of the private security firm Blackwater USA illegally smuggled weapons into Iraq that may have been sold on the black market and ended up in the hands of a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, officials said Friday."

2007-09-21 16:49:37 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-21 16:41:07 · 13 answers · asked by cmbc587 3

2007-09-21 16:40:40 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

BushFraud has spent more than all other presidents COMBINED!!! Why can't he be impeached for that?

2007-09-21 16:34:44 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

a korea-like presence of 55,000 troops would cost aboutt 25 billion a year in a "combat" scenerio similar to the current mission!!!

presisident bush likened america's future in iraq to the peacekeeping role u.s. troops play in south korea, where they have been stationed for some five decades!!!

congress has already appropriated $414 billion for the iraq mission, with another $200 billion to be required additionally
for the budget year beginning oct.1.

the bush administration has been trying to hide the cost of this war every step of the way!!!

"now the president is considering a significant ongoing presence iraq, long after he leaves office"!!!

2007-09-21 14:49:48 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

overpopulation,scarcity in food resources? if this is true i think sars disease might be one result of this.

2007-09-21 14:08:06 · 15 answers · asked by aqruipnos888 4