we have been in debt way before bush.
we must stop the out of control spending, vote for ron paul the person with the strongest voting record of all
2007-09-21 16:47:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Boston George 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Extending govt privilege previous the scope of the prevailing constitutional regulation is an impeachable offense. Willfully mendacity to the american public many times approximately healthcare reform (particularly achieveable the backside difficulty conceivable) is an impeachable offense. identifying directly to no longer enforce modern immigration regulations for political earnings is an impeachable offense. in case you look on the sum entire of all the different scandals that handed off for the time of his administration, it somewhat is distinctly elementary to return up with motives to question, yet that could desire to easily incite further rioting. you notice, we are residing in an "ends justify the flexibility" society the place suitable and incorrect propose little whilst in comparison with political correctness. If President Obama improve into white and his schedule distinctive, there could be relentless tension from the media to question. however the mainstream media totally endorses the Obama schedule, so little if something unfavorable is asserted related to this administration. definitely, if Jonathan Gruber have been working for the Republican celebration and a Republican President lied as blatantly to the american human beings approximately something as deeply very own as healthcare, how long do you think of he could be in place of work?
2017-01-02 12:25:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because every President and Congress (who controls the purse strings) since FDR would have been impeached. Secondly, the USA has not gone bankrupt since the Great Depression - the national debt is very similar to the personal debt you and I are paying and is actual proportionally less.
2007-09-21 17:28:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Caninelegion 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush isn't the only president to do so. There have only been 2 balanced budgets in over 30 years. Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton each had one. In all of these years there have been budget deficits.
2007-09-22 04:49:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by John 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because he has not done any such thing. Matter of fact the Bush tax cuts have increased revenue into the treasury. That plus the fact that our unemployment rate is below 5% gives is a far healthier economy than we had when he entered office.
2007-09-21 16:54:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because he didn't do it alone. It is not like he simply embezzled the money, he had the support of other branches of government and parts of the country. That doesn't make it right, moral, or ethical, but it happened.
2007-09-21 16:42:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wendy 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
Subsequent generations will ask that question a lot more, especially since they will be the ones having to pay for it through higher taxes. This is why the Bush "tax cuts" are phony baloney, since he has really raised taxes on future generations.
2007-09-21 16:43:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by hansblix222 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
You need to ask the tax mongering Democrats who have destroyed America with its ever increasing spending and tax increases.
2007-09-21 17:28:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
We Should Impeach Ourselves for Allowing Him to do it.
2007-09-21 16:38:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by M L 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Because the Democrats did it for decades and don't want that coming back on them.
2007-09-21 16:56:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋