Other - Politics & Government - July 2007

2007-07-19 16:54:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

They have oil money, let them hire soldiers of fortune to defend the state while they train more soldiers and let our soldiers come home and hey wouldn't that be a good idea for Europe also after all we have been there for more than 60 years and we simply can't afford it.

2007-07-19 16:51:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-19 16:19:07 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

i mean people hear the words national healthcare and they are all up in arms screaming out no! socialism! Yet i wonder if they really understand socialism which is simply, a
Political-economic doctrine that, unlike Capitalism which is based on competition, seeks a cooperative society in which the means of production and distribution are owned by the government or the people.
Furthermore adopting national healthcare will not make us socialist, whether u feel that is a terrible thing or not, it will just give people a chance to be taken care of. there can still be private care for those who can afford it. national healthcare would cover the gap for those lower middle class and upper lower class individuals who can't afford healthcare and are not eligable for state aid. what is so wrong with that, and why do people believe it will lead to socialism? Furthermore what is really that bad about socialism anyway. BE SPECIFIC, SORRY THIS WAS SO LONG.

2007-07-19 15:22:10 · 15 answers · asked by TR 4

now have sanctuary/bases in Pakistan?

Is it more important? to invade a radical Muslim country that has no WMDs or one that has shown the whole world that they do have WMDs?

2007-07-19 15:16:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Not only did the Democrats shoot these Republicans in the back, they then tried to cover it up.

Would these Democrats deserve a pardon by the President?

2007-07-19 14:23:12 · 12 answers · asked by Josh 4

i ran out of characters to finish the question, but you get the point. it started with prescott bush. arrested for treason, for financially supporting hitler and the natzi's. his son george has been in th cia ever since atleast 1963, involved in countless black and false flag operations against other countries and the american people. george 1 went on to "off" kennedy for not following the program as well as open a major pipeline for drugs to travel into our country that has since never been closed. breeding crime with drugs they bring in, they justify ever growing police and prison presents. they create the problem, and come to your rescue with thier solution. people are so stupid. this is exactly how hitler came into power. he was elected too. this is a crime family that has used the same tactics on us. bush sir. took clinton under his wing grooming him for the white house , first in mena arkansas ware clinton turned his head to major drug smuggling operations of cocaine

2007-07-19 13:34:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

So, it took less time to eradicate Hitler/Nazi Germany, Mussolini and Hirohito from Europe, the Pacific, South-East Asia, Middle East, Mediterranean, and Africa, than the War in Iraq.

I would like to hear some thoughts.

2007-07-19 12:50:54 · 11 answers · asked by Jackass 2

$30,000 is just barly enough to keep a roof over your head and food in your belly.

2007-07-19 12:50:28 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

And why do they warn us against exactly what is happening today. Were they just kooks and left wing nuts?

2007-07-19 12:43:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Watch the video on Americas concentration.

2007-07-19 12:31:57 · 3 answers · asked by gm8888 2

Lets say in the near future, what eventually will distinguish a civilian from a terrorist is a chip. The purpose is to catch terrorists and protect the populace from them. Those without the chips are automatically considered terrorists. Lets say the decision to chip all Americans for their own protection is due to a declared state of national emergency caused by a catastrophic terrorist attack.

This really isn't that far fetched.

If the time comes to put a chip in your body, and all those that resist and refuse to have a chip in their body are marked down as terrorists, would you submit?

2007-07-19 12:27:29 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Recently I realize we start things, but we never finish anything.

2007-07-19 12:25:58 · 7 answers · asked by David H 1

2007-07-19 12:24:06 · 20 answers · asked by LongJohns 7

I hope you can agree!

2007-07-19 12:22:44 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-19 12:14:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-19 12:10:53 · 10 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6

This greatly disturbs me, because it seems most people don't have a clue what the word means. let me enlighten you so you can stop throwing it around like an insult.

Those of you that do throw the world around like this are just closed minded and are more apt. to distroy this country than help it!

Definition:

Lib - er - al (adjective) : 1. Broad Minded -- tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others

2. Progressive politicaly or socially -- politics favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual

3. Generous -- generous with money, time, or some other asset.

Lib - er - al (noun) a liberal person -- somebody who favors tolerance or reform

2007-07-19 12:02:46 · 14 answers · asked by Bibliomaniac 2

Assume expenses are the same, but you are well taken care of.

2007-07-19 12:02:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Israel has well over 300 nuclear weapons, and has threatened to use these weapons, even if the whole world is destroyed in a third world war.

2007-07-19 11:53:05 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-19 11:42:25 · 6 answers · asked by TEXAS 2

2007-07-19 11:38:56 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok, so I'm only 15 and I won't be voting in the 2008 presidential election, but I will be able to vote in a couple years.
I just don't understand why people vote in the presidential elections when their votes don't even count. I mean, we (as the public) don't decide who is president..the electoral college does! Do they sway their votes sometimes to match the popular vote? or do they just vote for who they want no matter who won the popular vote?
I'm just wondering if i should even bother when I'm old enough to vote for president. I'm going to vote for more local candidates because those votes actually do matter..but for president..idk. I just feel like its pointless when some other people are deciding who's gonna be president anyway.

2007-07-19 11:33:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

The nation of Israel is official anti-Christian and anti-New Testament.

2007-07-19 11:14:26 · 9 answers · asked by jeremiahjjjjohnson 2

Her name wasn't public until Vanity Fair published it after all.

2007-07-19 11:05:22 · 5 answers · asked by civil_av8r 7

Why is our country so partisan? Liberals against Conservatives, Republicans vs. Democrats, what does it matter? Nothing will get
accomplished the rate our country is going. Both parties attack each other while neither cares about the people. I think that neither party is better. What do you'll think?

2007-07-19 10:45:20 · 10 answers · asked by J S 4

2007-07-19 10:44:06 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

According to the EU"Treaty/Constitution.........
"The currency of the Union shall be the Euro."
The Constitution would make this so, even though at present 13 of the 25 Member States still retain their national currencies.We will have NO choice, it makes the Euro constitutionally mandatory !!

2007-07-19 10:43:32 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-07-19 10:34:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Sorry, just 2 random questions. Can you please answer both truthfully

2007-07-19 10:22:06 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous