2007-07-19 11:38:56 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes! Sure, ha ha ho ho
2007-07-20 02:43:30 · answer #1 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because if there was two they would not have a monopoly.
2007-07-19 18:43:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
BECAUSE THEY ARE THERE TO MAKE THE RULES FOR THE MONOPOLY GAME AND KEEP IT RUNNING RIGHT
2007-07-19 18:43:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the same reason that there's more than one Department of Redundancies Department.
2007-07-19 18:44:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, we wouldn't want our government to really investigate business ethics, would we? That might cause fairness for the consumer(the worker), and we couldn't have that.
2007-07-19 18:44:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it takes only one organisation to tell others that they have to have at least two or more. I think that's right. Anway, that's one answer but there may be two or more
2007-07-19 18:44:28 · answer #6 · answered by trouble_906 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They don't like to many shareholders
2007-07-19 18:43:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋