It /might/ admit it has them, first. But, given how long it's been supposed to have had them, I'd guess it's not so inclined, or it'd've done so already...
2007-07-19 11:57:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
the only reason they have not already destroyed a lot of the middle east is because they want it for them selves in the future, and also they don't want the world against them, as it would be if they used A full blown nuke attack, and they did use some nukes in the 1968 war against Egypt and Syria, as our out fit gave them cover as they retrieved their unexploded war heads etc, and cleaned up as much as they could,
2007-07-19 19:10:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They might use nukes if that's what it takes to destroy Iran's nuclear plants. Of course that's only if they can't convince the US to do the bombing for them.
Yes, I've heard of Israel's threat. It's called the Sampson option. If Israel is hit by a nuclear bomb, they will use their submarines and planes to destroy the rest of the middle east. Pretty scary. Seymour Hersh wrote a book about it a few years ago.
2007-07-19 18:57:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Israel should end its occupation of other people land and Israel will live in peace after that. Its up to the Israeli lobby
2007-07-19 19:19:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They have not used them even when they were in the middle of a war started by the other side. (1973 Yom Kippur war)
What would make you think they would use them in a primitive strike.
2007-07-19 21:22:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No they won't use nukes, but they have plenty of other possibilities for Iran.
.
2007-07-20 01:29:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Hatikvah 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
all signs point to "YES",.....
2007-07-19 18:57:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋