Other - Politics & Government - June 2007

Follow this link then answer the following questions about the article.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070611/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_immigration;_ylt=AqQQwbVxN56Hqu3D62fyUy3MWM0F

What claims are being made?
Do the claims conflict with your personal observations?
What background information do you have about the claims?
What is the expertise of the author, if any?
Is the author biased & untrustworthy, or unbiased and trustworthy?

2007-06-11 11:42:26 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

make back seats to raise up to the height level requirments? I wonder what excuse state lawmakers will use if someone had their back seat taken out and lifted. Washington state law is 8 years old or 4' 9" and child must be over 13 to ride in front seat. Most back seats only have 3 seat belts which makes it impossible for my neighbor to pick up his 5 kids from school at the same time. Yet it is ok for a kid to ride in a truck bed. Makes me wonder if lawmakers are concerned about safety or more ways to increase revenue. Some people believe the "underdeveloped stomach muscle" excuse they are using. I don't. I was was in a serious car accident when I was a kid and the seat belt did not do any damage to my stomach musles. Neither did getting kicked in the stomach by a horse or hanging upside down in a ferris wheel with the belt digging into my stomach for 20 minutes until they fixed it. Hogwash to the lawmakers....

2007-06-11 11:37:36 · 4 answers · asked by skycat 5

is not grass cutting's a source methanol also . in this case wouldn't everybody have a little piece of gold in their own front or back yard ? are their not other way's .or is the goverment just blowing in the air and saying the house is on fire .?

2007-06-11 11:15:54 · 7 answers · asked by dirtdevil215 3

No, it was not George Washington.
Under The First Articles of Confederation (effective 1781-1789) there were 8 others elected, each serving to one year terms.
Washington was only the first president under the new Federal Constitution.
The very first president of the U.S. was John Hanson.
This would mean George Bush, Sr. is number 49 and George bush, Jr. is number 51.

2007-06-11 09:50:35 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

OK, it's not a riddle!!!
Why the illegals bother you more than the moron in charge?

2007-06-11 09:12:25 · 9 answers · asked by Rahaaa 3

is it odd to anyone else the constant bashing of the leader of the country we live in that we elected. i was alway taught to respect authority. i voted for him and do not agree with some of his decisions, but he still the leader of the country i live in.

2007-06-11 08:43:59 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous

i only speak english but somewhere where all the media nonsense and that type of thing is nonexistent. and how much money you have and your car aren't the two most important things

2007-06-11 08:19:45 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

He'd win big.

2007-06-11 07:57:57 · 14 answers · asked by Dirk von Pelvis 1

- we have classes: law only partially applies to celebrities, making them unequal to average citizens
- electoral college

-more examples?

2007-06-11 07:31:27 · 17 answers · asked by Ting 4

Do you have to have higher education to become a president of United States?

2007-06-11 07:11:49 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

My high school was half Mex and the rest was white on Patty day the Mex would try and beat up the whites nothing was ever done about it,We learned how to stick together and fight Now that I think about it can we have a Dem/lib day It would be so much fun!

2007-06-11 06:27:28 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

"Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale, and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled or hanged."

President Lincoln said that and I happen to agree. Isn't our Congress guilty of this?

2007-06-11 06:04:29 · 35 answers · asked by ? 6

This is my question about politics. I am just curious as
I have never been completely happy about any of them.

2007-06-11 05:57:32 · 18 answers · asked by animalperson00 1

personally, i say NOTHING!! ZIP!! NADA!! zilch!! but some think the employment numbers are good thanks to him! ha!! the only jobs are part time jobs at minimum wage and bush should not get credit!!

2007-06-11 05:53:16 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

I was flipping through the channels and came across CSPAN where the British House of Commons was in session. Some dude or lady approaches the table and says something, a bunch of people yell, then Tony Blair responds. What is going on here?

2007-06-11 05:51:05 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-06-11 05:09:48 · 6 answers · asked by ShadowCat 6

If pro-lifers are so into personal responibility, why aren't they more responsible? They should be teaching sexual education or fostering.

2007-06-11 04:49:41 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

would Mexicans have the same right to invade US for their pursue of happiness and security?

2007-06-11 04:23:59 · 8 answers · asked by Jose R 6

2007-06-11 04:14:15 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Downtown Houston, Texas, May 1, 2006. Jim Moore was reporting for KHOU-TV, a Houston TV station working an interview with an illegal immigrant. The following is a transcript of that interview.

Jim: Juan, I see that you and thousands of other protesters are
marching in the streets to demonstrate for your cause. Exactly what is
your cause and what do you expect to accomplish by this protest?

Juan: We want our rights. We will show you how powerful we
are. We will bring Houston to its knees!

Jim: What rights?

Juan: Our right to live here...legally. Our right to get all the benefits you get.

Jim: When did you come to the United States?

Juan: Six years ago. I crossed over the border at night with seven other friends.

Jim: Why did you come?

2007-06-11 03:51:36 · 8 answers · asked by ? 3

I think this may be the case, if these countries were "allowed" to develop.
1. they would be able to get a fair price for their commodities / mineral wealth
2. they would be a considerable opponent on the world trading markets

2007-06-11 03:36:35 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

America doesn't want blanket amnesty, the politicians are pushing it and Bush is lying and saying he is getting tough on illegal immigration.

Please read the bi-laws and subsections of the new open immigration bill:

http://www.infowars.com/articles/immigration/immigration_bill_10_reasons_immigration_surge_bill_is_appalling.htm

2007-06-11 03:34:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm tired of all the liberal, anti-bush, anti-war crud on TV and on the radio! does anyone know any good conservative stations that don't put the war and bush in vain?

Thanks

2007-06-11 03:12:48 · 13 answers · asked by westlake91 2

2007-06-11 02:57:16 · 32 answers · asked by captbullshot 5

Why would Castro allow this since he hates us so much?!?

2007-06-11 02:33:59 · 10 answers · asked by bluewavesguy44 2

2007-06-11 00:34:19 · 13 answers · asked by federalistcapers 2

so that once he has his nuclear weapons, he can run ruff-shod over the world..

2007-06-11 00:18:51 · 9 answers · asked by federalistcapers 2

and what about iran?? they are going to have a nuke within the next three years...who will stop them if the democrats are elected?

2007-06-11 00:11:31 · 9 answers · asked by federalistcapers 2

2007-06-10 19:23:06 · 7 answers · asked by 6th Finger 2

a great reward for those near him.

2007-06-10 19:16:45 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous