Pro-life and Personal Responsibilty?

Question

If pro-lifers are so into personal responibility, why aren't they more responsible? They should be teaching sexual education or fostering.

Answer 1

It is really hard to be responsible and have save sex when you were denied the education of how to have safe sex.

Thanks to the prudish religious nut jobs that have all but banned sex ed in school.

"Teaching" abstinence only is not educating people on how not to get a disease or not get pregnant.

Answer 2

I'm pro-choice.
They do teach it, and they donate lots to foster programs. I'm not sure why you aren't seeing this assuming you've done your research, but saying they aren't is strange.

They aren't allowed to in the public schools (though they try) because they won't teach the pro-choice options except grudgingly.

Answer 3

how about this for personal responsability.parents teach their kids and stop expecting everyone else to do it.its real simple.if you have unprotected sex you are exposed to every s.t.d.you are hightening risk of pregnancy.what is so god damn difficult about that?why do teachers have to take the responsability?why do i have to provide condoms in schools?why arent there more pro-choice people out doing their part?talk about lack of personal responsability.why dont they describe to the teenagers exactly what is done to an unborn baby in an abortion?show em pictures,be truthful,quit telling them its not their fault.

Answer 4

I am all for the youngsters being taught sex education. However, i dont feel that throwing condoms at them is the solution.

I also dont foster because I do not want kids, therefore I protect myself from pregnancy.

I am wondering how so many of us are able to NOT get pregnant by using BC methods available.

Answer 5

They are not responsible, they are just selfish. A child cannot make decisions and should be protected. Teenagers and adults can make decisions but choose abortion as it is convienient to their lifestyles and that what I think is irresponsible and wrong.