Evidently she read all 5,284 answers - 5 months ago in one sitting in
order to somehow choose a "best answer" Even with the best computer
equipment & browser service, this would take a considerable amount of
time to view over 5,000 answers NOT stopping to read any of them. I
applaud her accomplishment of this feat, (assuming she acctually even
attempted it)
Why then, would she be leaving a much greater task (37,938+ answers)
to pile up?
Having this past experience, wouldn't one try to work on reading all
these answers selecting possible qualifying good answers and discarding
definite poor responses, ahead of the ending time?
Also, how did she extend the answering period for her question for such
a long time?
and...
How did she do it without "logging in" to Yahoo Q&A?
Hillarys' current stats:
Begin participating on Yahoo! Answers One time: 100
Ask a question -5 (-10 : 2 questions asked)
Choose a best answer for your question 3 (+3)
Log in to Yahoo! Answers Once daily: 1 (+3 Logged on at least three times:
asked 2 questions and picked a best answer)
100 - 10 = 90
90 + 3 = 93
93 + 3 = 96
2007-02-20
16:48:23
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Write Your Name Here
4