As far as I know, no one who has concerns about abortion favors the death by dismemberment or chemical burning of newborns, infants or children when they are "inconvenient" to their parents.
So isn't this whole argument a fallacy?
2007-02-20 18:41:17 · 9 answers · asked by American citizen and taxpayer 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
What do you expect from the far left. These are the people that want to kill innocent babies, but yet want to abolish the death penalty. That is hypocracy if you ask me. They lie at every turn. The vast majority of anti abortion groups are also the most charitable organizations towards unwed mothers. The so called pro choice people can't claim to much in the lines of charity. The rail against Christians, but Christians are the generous people that offer donations to the poor and also help with adoption. The ACLU, NOW, and all the other Communist organizations don't like this though and don't like to talk about the truth. It hurts their cause. They hold back the truth on the true dangers of abortion and the hidious and barbaric practice of abortion. Only a monster could perform such a barbaric act. Before you prochoice idiots go slamming with the thumbs down and comments, go watch an abortion, if you can stomach it. I seriously doubt that many can. It would make you sick and cry. These are actual little babies being dismembered and mutilated. If a person did this to a child out side of the womb people would cry for the murderer to be at the very least imprisoned for ever, if not the death penalty.
For those of you who claim it should be done for medical reasons, name the medical reasons. I have listened to doctors say that it is for the most part an outright lie.
This is akin to child sacrifice practiced by pagans of ancient civilizations such as Carthaginians, Aztecs, Incas, etc..
By the way, no one makes you have a baby. I did not make you have sex. You did that on your own. THat argument is old and stupid. As far as cutting funding, that is also a big lie. No funding was cut. An insane and unreasonable increase was cut back. But there was still an increase. You libs can't even lie good.
It is also a fact that the Christian conservatives donate to the poor many than any other group. THe far left as a whole are at the bottom when it comes to generosity, except when it comes to taking my money to give to someone else.
You on the far left are hypocrites. You want the govt. to stay out of the abortion issue, but yet want govt. funding which comes from taxpayers. You double speaking liars.
You are worse than the politicians.
You on the far left use the word fetus instead of child because you don't like connecting the human factor to the baby inside the woman. Whether you call it a fetus, or a developing organism, it is still a human and a child. It doesn't have to be outside the womb to be called a child. That is an idiotic statement. It does have emotions and that is a medical fact. It has been documented by science in the 1st trimester.
2007-02-20 18:58:26 · answer #1 · answered by celticwarrior7758 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately, if one cannot make an argument for their own beliefs, they tend to retaliate with rhetoric against a different issue that has something to do with the first issue. In this way they do not answer the question of there own fallacies, but make the listener/reader think about their enemy (the conservatives in this selection). Both parties however do this to manipulate the public. If you call them on this they will tell you about lack of funding for welfare, education, and health care (which all effect children who have been born). Unfortunately, they have a valid point. I have seen the faultiness of both parties. But until the majority of all Americans decide to do something about it, we will have to endure a capitalistic,democratic, consumer driven, anti Christian, anti environmentalist, baby killing, poor bashing, closed border, immigrant fearing, chaos loving,narrow mindedness of the sinners of both party lines. Don't worry man, Jesus will be here soon! Peace and blessings!
2007-02-20 19:03:14 · answer #2 · answered by molly hadley 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Taterbug: you are the exception. once I ask conservatives in the pro-life rants in the event that they're keen to stand exterior an abortion health facility and furnish to undertake those "toddlers" so as that they might have a life, all i'm getting are a load of thumbs down! So I commend you. you're no longer purely conversing you're taking action besides. regrettably maximum professional-lifers are hypocrits. Their morality and bravery purely amplify so a great way as to declare somebody has to have a infant, yet they do no longer choose for to might desire to look after it, even via taxes, whilst it comes out of the womb. What replaced into as quickly as a ethical subject simply by fact the mothers problem, no longer theirs! As for the unique question, maximum conservatives basically choose for for finished strangers to have or stay via their morals. they are not attempting to "shop" all people. this is an excuse to regulate others as they whine bearing directly to the government.controlling them! AJ are you relatively that dumb? To think of "all" dems use abortion as delivery administration. Are you that stupid which you think of simply by fact of this some human beings are professional-determination? some individuals have wide-unfold others who might have died without an abortion. illnesses and ailment understand no political association!
2016-10-02 11:53:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
#1) There are millions of children living in poverty in THIS country.
#2) If a woman needs some help to care for her child because the father is out of the picture or undependable, she can get it, but it is:
A) Not enough to live on
B) Grudgingly given
C) A reason for Cons to call her names
D) Cut off if she does not leave the child, often with mini-
wage people who care little for the child, to go to
work. (Thereby depriving the child of what it needs
most!)
#3) They are sent off to war before they are old enough to know how evil the world can be.
#4) When people murder a child, the usual charge is "manslaughter" not "murder", and the jail time is short.
#5) Our educational system is down the toilet!!
How do Cons feel when someone else's children are inconvenient to them???
No, it is NOT a fallacy!
2007-02-20 19:28:41 · answer #4 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
First of all a child is NOT a child untill it's born. Before that it is a fetus relying on the mother for survival. Secondly, the republican administrations have consistently cut funds to aid low income families. Medicaid included. There are currently 16.000.000 children in the US living in poverty,( A SHAME) when the president is merrily spending 400 billion on an unnecessary, immoral war.
Nough'said.
2007-02-20 21:07:18 · answer #5 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No, not a fallacy, however dont all the repuglicans say that the people who end up on welfare arent worth the air that they breathe, right? well, in a nutshell any ways...
2007-02-20 18:57:44 · answer #6 · answered by Jessy 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Conservatives are pro-life, anti-abortionists... and yet are the ones who cut social programs for young children.
You have to have them... but don't expect our help with them.
2007-02-20 18:46:06 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Nice one .i like that
2007-02-20 18:43:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
:: sigh :: is that all you have?
2007-02-20 18:46:47 · answer #9 · answered by LM 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋