Government - May 2007

It seems like our town has hundreds of bars and night clubs, but nothing for our youth to do. Our town complains about under age drinking and drugs, but doesn't provide an outlet for it. How can i secure an abandoned building and the funds to turn it in to a safe place for the kids? any ideas?

2007-05-25 08:56:39 · 1 answers · asked by dj stevie 2

2007-05-25 08:43:53 · 3 answers · asked by letfreedomring 6

Or would he just give the Mormans most of the west like they have always wanted to form their own country?

2007-05-25 08:36:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

i think it is nixon but i don't know

2007-05-25 08:15:24 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is there a place where you can see how each and every Senator and Representative voted to plunge our hard earned money down the sinkhole known as Iraq?

2007-05-25 08:06:37 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

It seems like almost everyone is in favor of a simpler tax system, and a change really would save Americans a lot of time and effort. Is it the H&R Block lobby? Do the super-rich benefit from the current system? What is the problem here?

2007-05-25 06:37:17 · 9 answers · asked by Clarence 2

Even though its not overty so. Many black people are forgotten by the government.
Katrina is a recent example of this...

what are your thoughts on this?
should more be done to enforce equality?

2007-05-25 05:36:57 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

and bush lied about going to war which has resulted in thousands of deaths,,what in the world is going on here

2007-05-25 04:54:45 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

Democrats conceding to Bush, don't insist on troop withdrawal timetable.
I dont agree with the war on oil but now even the dems wont help the troops

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18841182/

2007-05-25 04:01:34 · 8 answers · asked by War d 3

what do you think?
time for a revolution?

2007-05-25 03:50:20 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I guess you have heard of that car who ran totally with water, it was say to take 22 gallons to go from NY to LA.

What happened with him? Did the government feared a economic meltdown?

2007-05-25 02:28:38 · 11 answers · asked by LawNerd 2

Maybe because Bush is such a good person that he wont be capable of attacking his own country for economical interest?

Maybe because a government has "never" attacked its own country?

Maybe because that just "does not" make sense? And why does not make sense?

There are tow kind of people, those who don't believe, and those who do not want to believe.

2007-05-25 02:15:24 · 19 answers · asked by LawNerd 2

How does a president sign a directive like this one http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html and NOT have it broadcast everywhere in the nation?! Why did this not make headline news? To further support my point here, YOU, the reader, probably weren't even aware that this directive was signed by Bush back on May 9th! I've even heard people deny word of this by saying it's a conspiracy! Well, check the URL, people! It's The White House web page. NOT a conspiracy. This directive will allow the President, in the event of a national emergency, to take TOTAL control of the country. This includes the power to OVERRIDE THE ELECTION and remain in office. It also states that there is no congressional approval required to initiate the directive. Whatever "national emergency" seems fit to the President. This, to me, seems disturbingly similar to the Reichstag fire. To give this kind of authority to ANY one person within our government, for whatever reason, is just insane!

2007-05-25 01:28:03 · 11 answers · asked by Habish Rahiri 2

All USA people should have protested the war in Iraq. Instead they re-elected president Bush. That shows how ignorant those people are. At least in Spain the people spoke and elected a president that was against the war in Iraq. It shows the difference in cultrue.

2007-05-24 22:48:31 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

is tony blair the prime mininster of England , Britain or UK?..if he is PM of Britain ,then who is PM of england?

2007-05-24 22:05:13 · 4 answers · asked by nanban s 2

2007-05-24 20:49:25 · 5 answers · asked by Mohammed N 1

2007-05-24 18:53:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please make characteristics as simple and easy to understand as possible, but put as much information in there as you can.

2007-05-24 17:59:11 · 6 answers · asked by Soccer_Fan_1111 1

2007-05-24 15:32:50 · 6 answers · asked by tamara r 1

2007-05-24 15:29:35 · 1 answers · asked by Sarpar 1

After 3 weeks of research into Environmental modification or EnMod I found many things suprising and thought I would share and see what is you take on this - Environmental modification or EnMod was researched in the beginning of the 1970s and portions of the U.S. government and/or military viewed weather and climate modification research as having transitioned from the "basic research" stage to the "operational" stage. Experiments were occurring - or had occurred - in 22 countries, including Argentina, Australia, Canada, Iran, Israel, Kenya, Italy, France, South Africa, Congo and the U.S.S.R. Airborne seeding programs were undertaken to combat drought in the Philippines, Okinawa, Africa and Texas. Fog clearing had become a standard operation at airports, as had hailstorm abatement, which had been proven successful in several parts of the world. Forest fire control had been carried out in Alaska and watershed seeding was widely practiced, while lake storm snow redistribution was under extensive investigation. By 1973 there were over 700 degreed scientists and engineers in the U.S. whose major occupation was environmental modification (EnMod).

And then it all changed. In 1978 The United States became a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (EnMod Convention or ENMOD for short). The EnMod Convention prohibits the use of techniques that would have widespread, long-lasting or severe effects through deliberate manipulation of natural processes and cause such phenomena as earthquakes, tidal waves and changes in climate and weather patterns.

Independent journalist Keith Harmon Snow wrote a massive report entitled: "Out of the Blue: Black Programs, Space Drones & The Unveiling of U.S. Military Offensives in Weather as a Weapon." In it he tells us: "In 1976, U.S. government officials outlined 50 experimental projects and 20 actual pilot programs costing upwards of $100 million over the next eight years. It was an explosive subject, up [through] the 1970s but, after 1977, EnMod interest seemed to disappear almost overnight. In other words, after decades of intense research and development, after billions of dollars of investment, after major institutions and governmental bodies were created and charged with oversight of EnMod and its many peripheral issues, and after the entire reorganization of the U.S. Government to channel and guide and map out the future of this new and promising military and civilian 'technology' - said to be more important than the atom bomb - everything stopped.
Or did it?
It was as if a huge curtain fell over the subject as all research, all institutional interests, huge salaries and thousands of jobs - vanished. And the mass media stopped reporting anything and everything as if struck by plague. That - sudden and total silence - is perhaps the most telling and suspicious indication of the secrecy and denial that the EnMod arena was shackled with. Today it is almost as if it never happened."

Could it be that the US government said, "Oh gee, we can't do that any more" and just gave up on military EnMod - or did the whole program go "black"?

2007-05-24 15:22:34 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-24 15:17:56 · 6 answers · asked by cjspeach016 1

2007-05-24 15:05:09 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I would just like to know. Because it seems like a lot of people don't care anymore about those innocent people. Our Innocent people on OUR land.

Im still pretty upset about it and still want to kick their ***. but i think sometimes im alone.

2007-05-24 14:28:30 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

I don't get it. No two people are ever going to agree on anything... Why can't they make a party that consists of representatives from all the groups, that way all the opinions are brought to the table, and we can compromise.

2007-05-24 14:22:43 · 8 answers · asked by . 4

2007-05-24 13:51:12 · 10 answers · asked by bright 3

What will be his legacy?

2007-05-24 13:01:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-24 12:57:06 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-24 12:42:49 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Soon the Canadian dollar will be at par with the US dollar

The Euro already exceeds the worth of the US dollar -

So what happened here ?


Economy weak - Too much spending on the war

People dumping because they have lost faith in the American economy ?

Or is this just another one in the long lines of up's and down's ?

2007-05-24 12:39:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous