Government - May 2007

There have been numerous revolutions in World History to overthrow a country, when people are not happy with the government. Would something like this work in the US or France or wherever because I think people do not have enough balls and militarys are too strong.

2007-05-02 09:17:50 · 3 answers · asked by baseballfreak9112 1

As we foreign nationals understand, thousands of US key mid level serving US military personnel are leaving the US military!

The Domocrats serving notice in-concert with the opinion of the US people to end / withdraw from Iraq. The Republicans hell bent on its continuation irrespective of how many more thousands (as in Veitnam) US military and its allies soldiers are to fall and pay the price.

President Bush, totally beleiving he is not accountable to congress, the opinion and will of the American Nation or to anyone - imposes his Veto!

One man, dictating to 260 million Americans!!

President Bush, Sir, U R worth no more than the despotic Muslim Clerics who dictate, rule and enforce their eveil code on the the very nature that the western civilized world seeks to depose!

Am I wrong - have I misunderstood what U R committing America and its peoples too!

Be gone - President Bush - U R totally out of step, unaware of the nations view of this conflict.

2007-05-02 08:21:23 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

The US president is not isolated in her/his religious commitment. So, a true religious individual WILL further his/her religious beliefs in office. So, what would be best for america? You cannot avoid this question no matter how much you play down its significants.

2007-05-02 08:19:02 · 11 answers · asked by HumanWhisperer 1

If in the unlikely chance the House and Senate do not pass bills that the President won't veto, what will happen. The president can't take the money and although I think there will be a comprimise what if the Dems refuse to bend?
If there is no money will the troops have to come home anyway? Will they be stuck there with no funding?

I really don't want the typical ignorant answer of "Stupid Democrats" or "Stupid Bush" although I know I will get a few. I'm really curious, hypothetically speaking, what would happen?

2007-05-02 07:26:22 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

We all know that going into Iraq was partly to control the world's oil sources. But nothing has been said regarding the revenues of the Iraqi oil fields. It was said in the beginning that the oil revenues would pay for the war and the rebuilding of Iraq. But this has obviously been another LIE!! Where is all the money going and how is it being divided. I have the suspicion that our multi-national oil companies are all reaping the benefits.!!! They all are Bushies!!

2007-05-02 07:08:32 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

bush

2007-05-02 06:31:13 · 14 answers · asked by shahram 3

Where do you go to report slowness at US> Post office in Houston Tx.This is on purpose and it is causing lots of people anger and frustration ..this man waiting on people in lobby is SUPERVISER"!! He had lines of people waiting 20 to 30 minutes while getting parcel pkgs from inside post office...chills in lobby and piddles with paper on purpose and stands there looking everywhere and tapping note pad with pen and looks a his nails and just stands there doing NOTHING for a few minutes more while angry people in line are waiting what asking the _________?? He is rude as all get go!! This is very unproffesional because the line inside lobby is already tied up 45 min. wait and he is running the EXPRESS window?? Go figure!!! I know there is somewhere I can complain please HELP!!!

2007-05-02 05:25:07 · 5 answers · asked by sunshine 4

We've all seen the news, congress approves a bill with a timetable included, Bush vetoes it. Bush wants an open-ended cash flow, and congress wants an idea of when this will all come to a close. If congress is so determined why don't they just start cutting funding for the war? What will this all result in?
(Serious answers please)

2007-05-02 05:24:29 · 10 answers · asked by Demosthenes 2

Doesn't religion require that behavior on a weekly basis? Pretending to know things that you do not know.

2007-05-02 04:58:13 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am from the UK, and no it's not a spelling error

2007-05-02 03:28:12 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-02 03:16:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Even though he disagrees with establishing a date for withdrawl, isn't he cutting the legs out from under our troops while ignoring the will of the majority? If the U.S. is a true republic, isn't he morally obligated to go along with the majority in congress?

2007-05-02 03:11:46 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

i am doing a report on WIPO but i dont understand the websites or wikapedia's descriptions, can someone please describe and tell me about WIPO

2007-05-02 00:55:05 · 1 answers · asked by swweeeetttt 1

but this can' be normal and is certainly not good service, who
should i contact to check on this?

2007-05-01 21:30:36 · 1 answers · asked by Cheryl G 1

After all, Hugo Chavez decided to seize control of all oil projects in Venezuella which foreign companies have invested $17 billion in, why should we allow Citgo to operate freely in the US? I wonder how Joe Kennedy would feel about us using his buddy's tactics?

2007-05-01 17:22:12 · 6 answers · asked by heavysarcasm 4

2007-05-01 17:06:44 · 3 answers · asked by psychoemet 1

Borrowing money enables the government to spend more in the present without having to make up the differance until years later. Why do you think that for many years poloticians found it easier to borrow money than to cut the deficit?

2007-05-01 15:10:46 · 4 answers · asked by steph's_joy 3

2007-05-01 15:08:09 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-01 14:23:19 · 1 answers · asked by Amanda 3

2007-05-01 14:21:57 · 10 answers · asked by Clown on Crack 2

All the cable networks showed the president's statement live today, and then the Democrats' response. Why do you think FoxNews didn't show the response? Technical problems? :>

2007-05-01 13:06:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Most presidents end up giving lectures and spending time in talk shows,will Jorge speaking tour wind up in his native land for Univision and Telemundo

2007-05-01 12:10:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

What does the word Veto means

I always read the part which says

Bush will veto the bill !!!

thanks

2007-05-01 11:59:38 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

elected such an ignoramus to be the leader of the United States? 99% of us now see that the man is defective between the ears. The other 1% listens to Rush Limbaugh and doesn't know how to think!

2007-05-01 11:51:43 · 10 answers · asked by drunkandisorderly 3

"There's been some real progress on some fronts and in other places the terrorists have continued to challenge democratic governments," Rice said when asked about a State Department report showing Terrorist attacks worldwide shot up MORE THAN 25% last year. Who is buying her B.S.?

2007-05-01 11:50:50 · 3 answers · asked by jeb black 5

or would you rather the country be in the hands of people who want to destroy Israel and the U.S.?

2007-05-01 11:21:02 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

So many people want to see a change in course in the war, because clearly the current course is not working. However, Bush's stubborness and obsession to achieve a successful mission is putting the lives of thousands of American soldiers at risk. I think that this behavior is a good enough reason to consider taking away the president's ability to veto a bill. I think it is pretty obvious that the officials in favor of this latest bill are much more intelligent in this matter and it is time that Bush start taking other people's advice into consideration.

2007-05-01 11:11:14 · 9 answers · asked by Hmmm... 3

2007-05-01 10:01:24 · 6 answers · asked by elcheco 2

Where are we now, as a country, when open dissent it stepped on, and any criticism of our president and the war is seen as a personal attack on our troops?
I would like to direct interested people in Bill Moyer's fascinating and disturbing PBS documentary called 'Buying the War' (http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html).

2007-05-01 09:30:28 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

OK,let me see if I got this right if Hillary gets elected President , That would make the last 8 yrs with Bush ,8 Yrs with Clinton and then 4 with Bush Sr. and then 4 or 8 with another Clinton....Is it me or is there a pattern developing in the White House and something not seeming right ? Lets make sure she doesn't get elected cause apparently 2 Families are running if not ruining this Country..........

2007-05-01 06:57:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous