Government - March 2007

2007-03-25 05:41:26 · 1 answers · asked by anabanana1948 1

Do you want to pledge an oath to fight for and achieve a free country where you are not forced to pollute and?
destroy the future of life? Do you believe that the freedom to not use water to flush the toilet (mixing water, feces, urine, & bleach not being necessary) is paramount to the basic human rights of survival. Do you believe in fattening government coffers by mixing water and sewage is a form of torture against you and your children.? And it is on this same basis of freedom to survive that you object to the 95 percent forced situation of using death causing, air polluting forms of transportation, when proven methods of non-polluting methods to travel have already been in existence on the planet for thousands of years as well as new methods of non-polluting transportation that are now available. Do you like making rich people richer using their throw-away food and object containers? Using reusable containers would decrease dump capacities by a very large percentage and would be the actions of a mature and caring society, other than a wasteful, non-caring, greedy, insane, & hateful 1.

2007-03-25 05:39:57 · 1 answers · asked by warning 2

Please read the following about how the Iranian leadership views America!

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/1/23/173442.shtml?s=lh
http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/2006/April/Bush/index.html
http://www.president.ir/en/

These are just a few looks at how the Iranians look at the West in general and America specifically! When you have evaluated the cultural and religious content of these reports and statements, Please explain to me how the American government can reach any meaningful understanding with the Iranian government?

2007-03-25 05:37:48 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 05:32:11 · 15 answers · asked by tanya s 1

it's a total joke! drugs are more readily available, and more of the population is using now than before!

Locking somebody up because they are addicted is inhumane. rehabilitation is a more humane approach to the problem.

Also, when you put a felony on someone's record because they were abusing pain pills is detrimental to the person, because they will not be able to get a job afterward.

The CIA is involved in importing drugs, also. CIA should stand for Cocaine Importing Agency.

I am a GIS professional, and anybody in my field knows that they could put a total stop to the importing of drugs if they really wanted to, but it seems our economy is dependent upon the drug money.

2007-03-25 04:38:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

ASWAN, Egypt - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Sunday she raised U.S. criticism of Egyptian democracy efforts with President Hosni Mubarak, but added the United States would not try to dictate how Egypt should proceed.

///
Where does the United States get the right to dictate what another free country does with its politicks? We are getting to be Dictators of the world. Who are we going to invade next?

2007-03-25 04:14:10 · 6 answers · asked by THE ARTIST 1

They operate in an interconnected matrix of groups disguised as respectable civil rights and legal organizations. These groups attack all national security measures, subvert immigration laws and procedures, lobby on behalf of terrorist and enemy combatants and engage in propagandistic apologetics for the most brutal dictatorships in the world even as they constantly vilify and demean America and Americans. As they do these things to destroy America and shame Americans, they hypocritically portray themselves as defenders of democracy and humanity.

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/14399.html

2007-03-25 04:10:44 · 7 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”[1] James Paul Warburg (1896-1969) was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Company which financed the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the government of Germany.[2] A world government is a world without borders, national sovereignty, constitutions, privacy, autonomy, individual liberties, religious freedoms, private property, the right to bear arms, the rights of marriage and family and a dramatic population reduction (two thirds). A world government establishes a slave/master environment wherein the state controls everything.

2007-03-25 04:06:41 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

1) To pay your taxes and contribute to the NHS Defence,and Education system, to finance research into deadly illness etc etc

2) Not to pay any tax, have no-where to take your loved ones when they are sick, to educate them privately, to see terrorism grow as a result of not having any funding for the security of our nation.

I only ask, as many Y/A users seem to have a thing against paying for the services our taxes provide, yet seem to complain daily about the services they get. If you want your own team of doctors and nurses the second you enter a hospital for instance, you have to pay for it. How do people propose to have these benefits without everyone contributing?

2007-03-25 04:05:49 · 8 answers · asked by ? 5

2007-03-25 04:05:35 · 3 answers · asked by Desann 1

how much of congress does it take to overrule a vetoed bill

2007-03-25 04:03:23 · 4 answers · asked by xo24 2

2007-03-25 03:57:39 · 4 answers · asked by Sparkle 2

I have to go with Henry Fonda in "Fail Safe"

2007-03-25 03:55:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I recently moved and I need information on how and who to contact and how much it costs. I live in BC and we have postal outlets but no real post offices.

2007-03-25 03:38:34 · 4 answers · asked by Lj 1

(if he's still alive).

2007-03-25 03:37:09 · 13 answers · asked by krypto'nstreaky 2

2007-03-25 02:58:56 · 4 answers · asked by frnkhockey 1

2007-03-25 02:54:59 · 23 answers · asked by Cane 1

remember theres 130000 troops in iraq right now 20000 troops r going 2 b sent 2 iraq. 2 years ago there were 160000. so do the math 20000 new troops + 130000 =150000. thats 10000 less than 2 years ago

2007-03-25 02:25:41 · 6 answers · asked by djizz 2

They are anti- Hindu
They are anti-progress
They are anti-Modern
They are anti-success
They are anti-Professionalism
They are anti-Globalisation
They are anti-Western

They are pro-Muslim
They are pro-Left
They are pro-Secular
They are pro-Communist
They are pro-Humanist
They are pro-Corruption
They are pro-Failure
They are pro-Arab

2007-03-25 01:04:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-25 00:42:00 · 7 answers · asked by joseph r p 1

I'm now undergoing a project regarding the relationship between civil society and the state, while Singapore is one of the countries that i would like to mention. Therefore, I'm looking for some related information. Fact, statistics or figures (e.g. the most common kinds of civil society there and number of those organizations) are welcome. Thanks a lot!!!

2007-03-24 23:47:46 · 3 answers · asked by Benjamin_HK 1

our conservatives bomb children in poor countries, what the hell are the conserving?

2007-03-24 23:44:51 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-24 22:04:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-24 22:04:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Actually you are President Clintons kind of gal! Have cigars?

2007-03-24 21:12:06 · 3 answers · asked by john s 1

2007-03-24 19:56:01 · 1 answers · asked by u.s.a.fight back,buy american 2

2007-03-24 19:38:49 · 2 answers · asked by crislyn d 1

How many out there in England are celebrating this landmark? and why?

2007-03-24 19:32:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-24 19:26:58 · 1 answers · asked by crislyn d 1

Thu Mar 22, 3:13 PM



CALGARY (CBC) - A new poll suggests most Canadians believe climate change is a reality, but people in various regions hold widely different attitudes - with Albertans expressing the most skepticism.



The survey conducted by Angus Reid Strategies released Thursday found that almost four in five Canadians - 77 per cent - are convinced global warming is real.


"This is the biggest study that has been done on Canadians and their opinions and attitudes towards global warming," Angus Reid poll researcher Ellie Sykes told CBC News Thursday.


"People are really getting on the band wagon. They're really looking for government and corporations to take a much larger step than they have so far."


In Alberta, 69 per cent of respondents said they believed in global warming, while in Quebec, the number soared to 83 per cent

2007-03-24 19:15:39 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous