Will World Government come about through conquest or consent?

Question

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”[1] James Paul Warburg (1896-1969) was the son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Company which financed the Russian Revolution through James’ brother Max, banker to the government of Germany.[2] A world government is a world without borders, national sovereignty, constitutions, privacy, autonomy, individual liberties, religious freedoms, private property, the right to bear arms, the rights of marriage and family and a dramatic population reduction (two thirds). A world government establishes a slave/master environment wherein the state controls everything.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Spingola/deanna41.htm

it seems that the neo-conservatives, who have hijacked the conservative movement are just as likely to make that happen, as "liberals."

Answer 1

It will most likely come from consent, especially in the US from the liberals who don't really care about national sovereignty and the rights of the people to govern themselves.

Answer 2

worldwide goverance as you define it? Neither by way of conquest or consent, yet by way of the failure of folk to create and take care of the worldwide they desire for their little ones, yet instead passively accepting paranoia as their governance. the destiny is made (if i'm going to paraphrase an old merchandising slogan) "the old trend way: they EARN it."

Answer 3

In this case, conquest and consent are the same thing. Take conquest, for example. After the conquest, if there are any survivors, then they consented to the new government, instead of fighting it.