This is somewhat related to the question of who should be the nominee. But not entirely.
Frankly, I am concerned that all of the Republicans' two or three major players have substantial drawbacks.
I like what I see of Thompson, philosophically, but he has yet to prove himself completely to me.
Then again, one could well say that ALL of the Democratic contenders are "minor players" when it comes to experience, and there are splits on issues in that party too.
I am concerned, though, that the Democrats are very organized, and the American electorate has a history of "taking turns" with the parties.
So, tell me what you think - who has the best chance of leading the party and keeping the White House?
I must say at the start I am not a Ron Paul fan. And I can't stop Democrats from answering, although that's not really my focus.
I don't want to be too pessimistic, but if you have good news please share it. I can't believe the country would vote for Clinton, but . . .
2007-09-20
03:37:23
·
15 answers
·
asked by
American citizen and taxpayer
7