Hillary Pres, Obama VP. You'll see the buttons early next year.
2007-09-20 01:33:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Wiz 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Unless we had a time machine there is no way of knowing anything.
But what I do know is that neither, unfortunately, will ever have a shot.
Why because whenever these candidates are introduced it is always. And now the WOMAN who may be president or And now THE FIRST BLACK president.
It is never just Barack Obama/Hilary Clinton , presidential hopeful for the democratic party.
It is very sad but we are still an extremely prejudiced society.
There are just so many people who say live by the Bible but yet not one can answer just one simple question. What was the part of the Bible and the only part of the Bible written by GOD?
Answer, the 10 commandments and it says point blank, love thy neighbor as thyself. It did not say only if they are white, heterosexual, or Catholic.
Now if you like to know my answer as to why this world is really a mess just ask.
2007-09-20 01:33:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No because Barack has already said that he will not be a VP. Hillary would not be a good VP for Barack because 1 her ego is to large to play 2ND fiddle, and beside that it will be a bad ticket Hillary have too much bad baggage and they both need a military person to offset the none military background they both have We must understand that we are at war and will still be we the election is over. If Barack are Hillary is elected they must have a person who has served in the military to offset this weakness. The person that come to mind is Wesley Clark.
2007-09-20 01:42:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by kenny B 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Clinton- President, Obama- VP....that would pretty much guarantee a Democrat in office for at least 8 years.
2007-09-20 03:32:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Lisa M 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
regerugged- Both Clinton and Obama are right wing compared to almost every other country in the world. Have you ever looked at a politcal compass?
2007-09-20 01:32:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Will never happen. Clinton will win and will probably choose John Edwards
2007-09-20 03:29:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by debrawashburn 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama with Clinton-no; better choice would be Edwards.
2007-09-20 01:48:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No,
Barack has gotten under Clinton's skin, she will never let him run with her. She will get the nomination and choice someone else to be VP. Either Richardson, or retired General Clark.
2007-09-20 01:36:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chris 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
I just hope that somebody worthwhile decides to run, we really don't need either of them.
2007-09-20 02:13:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I hope not!!
I've seen many people make claims about how their candidate will do this and that? but have you actually verified this and do you have the facts?I just want to make sure that before voting everyone is clear on where the candidates stand… I find that some not all avid supporters of the mainstream candidates believe their candidate is for something just because they are a democrat or republican, or just because they made a speech mentioning it… You really have to check the candidate’s track records.. and SEE for yourself what they have and have not voted for…
Barack Obama..has made it fairly obvious he is opposed to the war in Iraq, but what about entering a war with Pakistan and Iran now, immigration, the economy, why did he reauthorize the Patriot Act?
Here is some extra information People tend to not talk about when it comes to the top tier candidates:
Barack Obama
-Military action in Pakistan if we have actionable intel. (Aug 2007)
-Fact Check: Yes, Obama said invade Pakistan to get al Qaeda. (Aug 2007)
-Extend welfare and Medicaid to immigrants. (Jul 1998)
-Voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government. (Jun 2007)
-Voted YES on establishing a Guest Worker program. (May 2006)
-Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security. (May 2006)
-Register women for draft, but not for combat. (Jul 2007)
-Voted YES on preserving habeus corpus for Guantanamo detainees.
-Voted YES on reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act. (Mar 2006)-Opposes gay marriage; supports civil union & gay equality. (Oct 2006)
-Supports affirmative action in colleges and government. (Jul 1998)
-Explore nuclear power as part of alternative energy mix. (Jul 2007)
Hillary Clinton
Keep Cuban embargo; pay UN bills. (Oct 2000)
Voted YES on enlarging NATO to include Eastern Europe. (May 2002)
Opposed to draft, but register women for draft. (Jul 2007)
Voted YES on preserving habeus corpus for Guantanamo detainees. (Sep 2006)
Voted YES on reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act. (Mar 2006)
Voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government. (Jun 2007)
Voted YES on establishing a Guest Worker program. (May 2006)
Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security. (May 2006)
Focuses on increasing relationship between US and Israel. (Oct 2000)
Critic of Iraq war, but won't recant 2002 vote in its favor. (Nov 2006)
Voted YES on $86 billion for military operations in Iraq & Afghanistan. (Oct 2003)
Source(s):
Source: ontheissues.com
With these stances on the issues, are these the people you really want running the country.. Our job as voters is to be informed so we can select the right person who will benefit the majority of this country... not just the elite.. Unfortunately Hillary and Barack are not those candidates..
2007-09-20 01:38:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋