In California, why don't they just cut the trees down in a RIVER-LIKE path to stop the fire? Lets face it, there is ONLY ONE way to stop the California fire, CUT IT. If there are no trees or brush in the way, there's not going to be any fire now is there?
The funny thing is that I heard that they don't wan't to kill the endangered watchama-call-it Frog when they cut down the trees,m so they make it against the law to cut the trees? But Ironically because they don't the forest burns down and the endangered frogs die anyways? Right? And the Californians Houses burn down because they weren't allowed to cut thier grass and shrubs and stuff because they could possibly kill some sort of endangered rat and if they did cut their lawns, then they would be put in jail for one year and get fined $100,000/ Right?!.
Do Democrats want the forests to burn down? After all, they make laws not to cut the trees which is the only way to stop the fire, PREMANENTLY.
2007-10-29
18:26:27
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Law & Ethics