I know someone who has been charged with a crime she has no idea about. Because of a propable cause from a warrant, The police found evidence and ended up arresting everyone who was in the home. I need answers. Please Help. Are they only suppose to arrest the person that they think was involved or do they arrest everybody including the innocent?
2007-08-10 14:01:41 · 15 answers · asked by helen 1 in Law & Ethics
How are we going to restore our image as not only a group of compassionate individuals, but a party that can truly lead the worlds greatest superpower?
2007-08-10 14:00:30 · 9 answers · asked by Randolph 3 in Other - Politics & Government
does it insult you that you really are not rich enough to reap the benifis of a TRUE republican?
yet run around acting all cool with a big "R" on your turtleneck sweater. Supporting the cause because it makes you "feel like you are in the club".
I'd be pissed if i considered myself a republican. Knowing how much money you really have to be part of the club.
it's o.k. if you feel used though. That's the way RIGHTY meant it to be.
2007-08-10 14:00:08 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government
If you think that passive smoking in public places will kill you then try living where I did. Let me start by saying that I am a 44 year old smoker who has smoked since the age of 10. I served on British diesel submarines between 1980 and 1989. There were no smoking bans in place apart from the control room at periscope depth and at least 80% of the crew were smokers. So for months on end not only would I be smoking my 40 smokes a day I would partake in passive smoking from 57 other people. Then from 1990 to 1994 I served on Australian submarines but they would not let you smoke in the messes. When you are locked in a 300 foot tube with smokers well you work it out. As for my health last year I had a full medical including lung capacity test well here is the surprise I have the lungs of a 30 year old. I have never had a day off work due to illness I play golf at least 3 times a week and never get short on breath. So according to most answers from none smokers why am I still alive?
2007-08-10 13:59:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics
how has Bush gotten this far without getting canned.
Clinton showed this penis to a clerk, but Bush showed his penis to the world. go figure
2007-08-10 13:59:37 · 5 answers · asked by Eric the Great *USA* 4 in Politics
2007-08-10 13:59:04 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics
Bush's war advisor seems to think so: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QUECGG1&show_article=1
what do you think
2007-08-10 13:58:34 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military
Keeping people suffering and living a little longer makes the drug industry and others massive profits, as someone pointed out in a previous answer. Is that a good reason for depriving euthanasia to Americans, while some other countries show their compassion for those who are suffering?
2007-08-10 13:54:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics
okay ia throwing a party with 2 other people the budget is 600 that means 200 a piece i one person i in charge on something and her portion of the party ends up being free i fell that her 200 should go to some other things we need for the party
2007-08-10 13:53:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics
2007-08-10 13:52:38 · 15 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics
perform plays?
2007-08-10 13:52:21 · 2 answers · asked by Terri L 2 in Military
Your rating:
1. Very important (Historically).
2. Fairly important.
3. Not very important.
4. Not important at all.
And why?
And will you be voting?
2007-08-10 13:50:55 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics
I know in general they don't want government anywhere that isn't expressly acknowledged in the constitution and such but what about things like gay marriage, abortion, foreign policy, ect...?
2007-08-10 13:49:06 · 8 answers · asked by TJ815 4 in Politics
2007-08-10 13:43:24 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Government
after the Recent Supreme Court disision concerning the Ebby Case I want to get a group or attorneys Many attorneys Alot of attorneys to Challange the Supreme court of the state of Michigan. I want my day in court but not only that I want where the criminal activity is not rewarded in this manner. In my case they altered the Records and I just figured it out and can prove it and now the ebby case came up and possibly ruined it for me. 7 years I have been fighting for the Killing of my son at a local Hospital Seven long years Now I must make a differace. I need the attorneys to band together take this case and Make it work I will tell you I can prove the Doctor was 14 miles away when they said he was doing an exam. I have the Bloody shirt where they let him bleed out. but it is so much more than that now It is this system created for the insurance companys Now being used by the doctors to get away with it. and the laws all protect them I want my day in court. Lets take on the State.
2007-08-10 13:40:25 · 2 answers · asked by bobbyljohnson@gmail.com 1 in Law & Ethics
I am writing this from Japan.
I know you Americans are all taught in schools that a-bombing had served as the means to end the war and saved the lives of the people who might have died if the war continued.
But there were other alternatives like dropping the atomic bombs on uninhabited islands instead of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
2007-08-10 13:37:36 · 29 answers · asked by sayounara00000 1 in Military
the people must be represented...but in the 1700's the fastest a message could travel was by horse. So back then it was only reasonable for the people of a district to elect 1 individual who could frequent washington and represent their concerns and values assuming that he/she shares them. But now days we have the internet and we have .gov's. it is assumed that almost everyone has access to computers and the internet in the United States. So then, why can't we the people represent ourselves??? here my plan: have some sort of website like "www.vote.gov" where each citizen has an account and can vote on issues that congress would otherwise be voting on...this way they could double check their account to make sure that what they voted for actually registered correctly...this would make electronic voting fraud-free. If there was an error in the vote, a citizen could simply make a claim and correct the problem. This system also ensures that measures are passed because they are truly popular
2007-08-10 13:37:12 · 4 answers · asked by T-monster 3 in Other - Politics & Government
I am doing an essay on the statue of limitations on warrants in Canada and I am having a little trouble finding the information I am looking for, so any help would be apprieciated.
2007-08-10 13:36:45 · 1 answers · asked by LadyRage 1 in Law & Ethics
2007-08-10 13:32:40 · 39 answers · asked by Julia 3 in Immigration
I do not understand how anyone could support Bush especially after his last 7 years of political failures. Under the Bush administration America has fallen to it's lowest depths and the constitution has been raped almost to it's death. The facts are so bluntly abundant I don't see how anyone could support this tyranny under this dictatorship.
On this continued path we will soon have no liberties and freedoms left, all gone in the name of terrorism. Whats so sad is that most Americans will proudly give up their Liberties and Freedoms for the deceiving promise of security. Now do you really think that our government can truely provide complete security? No way, No how. There will never be security as long as their is hate and no matter what we do their will always be some kind of hate that exists.
Bush has raped the constitution, spied on HIS citizens illegally, abused HIS powers of executive order and continually LIED to the American people.
It's time to IMPEACH BUSH!
No to the NWO
2007-08-10 13:25:54 · 12 answers · asked by Chaoticfreedoms 3 in Politics
If America were really threatened, and really under attack we we would have no problem finding troops. There would be line-ups around the block at recruiting offices. The military would have to triple its recruiting staff to accomodate citizens wanting to join! Americans would be desparate to contribute to any effort to protect this country.
But Iraq never attacked America. They never had WMDs, nor did they pose any threat to us. This unjust and unnecessary war has turned people off the armed forces.
The threats against us now can be solved through political and diplomatic actions.
A draft would only anger Americans and cause more instability. And it would be stupid, because if we really needed more men in the Army we would have no problem getting them.
What do you think?
2007-08-10 13:25:06 · 19 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1 in Politics
It seems strange that in a country where how you speak and what school you attended means a likelihood of financial success, can call itself a democracy! I mean even now 75% of the cabinet went to Oxford or Cambridge. So it seems that if your ancester got lucky or backstabbed or stole a millenium ago, your only chance is the lottery or become a crime boss!!!
Bugger me we're all getting shafted.
ppose they'll want my kids to fight to keep them in clover too!
2007-08-10 13:24:59 · 30 answers · asked by caligula_divinity 1 in Other - Politics & Government
2007-08-10 13:24:35 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Elections
is it me or just the heirs to the throne righty. but how is their business....their business. and the citizens business also their business?
Give a Nazi a wiretap and never speak another word. i alway say.
2007-08-10 13:22:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government
i put a small pebble in the cap of my girlfriends tire to let the air out, the tire is not damaged it just dosent have air .would that still be criminal property damage?
2007-08-10 13:11:46 · 20 answers · asked by sav 1 in Law Enforcement & Police
In response to recent market drops, the Federal Reserve increased the money supply.
The Fed said in a statement, "'The Federal Reserve is providing liquidity to facilitate the orderly functioning of financial markets."
Source:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070810/bs_nm/centralbanks_dc_4
2007-08-10 13:10:15 · 16 answers · asked by Steve 6 in Politics
Considering we need a change in this country and I am talking a political over-haul. One that the people finally have the say what happens for once.
2007-08-10 13:10:10 · 16 answers · asked by Vivianna 4 in Civic Participation
For example, one con said giving gays the right to marry is not about equal rights but "special rights." He said gays never had that right to begin with since this nation was founded.
Well I can think of a few rights people did not have when this nation was founded too:
- the right not to be owned
- the right to marry of a different race
- the right for women to own property, vote, and hold office
- the same rights for minorities, etc,etc
You know who else are big "traditionalists"?
TERRORISTS! They're as backward as they come.
2007-08-10 13:08:14 · 10 answers · asked by trovalta_stinks_2 3 in Politics
No more immigration to America until we gets our country in order. Build the walls to stop illegals from
crossing. No more schooling, health care, or jobs for illegals. What's your view.
2007-08-10 13:06:22 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Immigration
Now that Bush is succeeding in Iraq the UN comes back in to try and take partial credit.
Libs deny the surge is working, and it is working or the UN would not be coming back into the picture. Libs will give all the success to UN, and say Bush was not successful. To bad the Democrats will only be known as quitters. Dems did everything they could to prevent winning the war on terror.
2007-08-10 13:03:16 · 12 answers · asked by mission_viejo_california 2 in Politics
Questions asked on 10 August 2007:
Showing 211 to 240 of 743 questions
Questions asked on other days: